[Bug fortran/91390] treatment of extra parameter in a subroutine call

2019-08-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91390 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/91483] Poor diagnostic on trying to take constexpr reference to non-static object

2019-08-18 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91483 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/37242] missed FRE opportunity because of signedness of addition

2019-08-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242 Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dimhen at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/37242] missed FRE opportunity because of signedness of addition

2019-08-18 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242 --- Comment #24 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- r257061 optimize too gcc version 8.0.1 20180125 (experimental) [trunk revision 257061] (GCC)

[Bug target/91481] New: POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

2019-08-18 Thread lloyd at randombit dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 Bug ID: 91481 Summary: POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/91480] Nonconforming definitions of standard library feature-test macros

2019-08-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91480 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/91482] New: __builtin_assume_aligned should not break write combining

2019-08-18 Thread msharov at users dot sourceforge.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91482 Bug ID: 91482 Summary: __builtin_assume_aligned should not break write combining Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91483] New: Poor diagnostic on trying to take constexpr reference to non-static object

2019-08-18 Thread barry.revzin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91483 Bug ID: 91483 Summary: Poor diagnostic on trying to take constexpr reference to non-static object Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/91484] New: Error message: std::is_constructible with incomplete types.

2019-08-18 Thread asschool at yandex dot ru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91484 Bug ID: 91484 Summary: Error message: std::is_constructible with incomplete types. Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91390] treatment of extra parameter in a subroutine call

2019-08-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91390 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 46724 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46724=edit Something that sort of works... and also extends the error message with a reference to where the mismatching

[Bug libstdc++/91480] Nonconforming definitions of standard library feature-test macros

2019-08-18 Thread frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91480 --- Comment #2 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com --- I agree the problem of 'L' is not likely found as a real issue in practice. Perhaps this could be forwarded as an issue of the standard which requires overspecified definitions. I don't find

[Bug lto/64636] Bootstrapping gcc-4.9.2 fails if lto is enabled

2019-08-18 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636 --- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- I can confirm that disabling LTO on sparc64 makes gcc build fine.

[Bug target/83531] Build broken on macOS 10.13.2

2019-08-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83531 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.5 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-08-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91472] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-08-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91472 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/91486] future::wait_for and shared_timed_mutex::wait_for do not work properly with float duration

2019-08-18 Thread john.salmon at deshaw dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486 --- Comment #1 from John Salmon --- Created attachment 46727 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46727=edit demonstration code

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-08-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Aug 18 19:11:29 2019 New Revision: 274625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274625=gcc=rev Log: Darwin, libsanitizer - remove reference to __cxa_rethrow_primary_exception. For

[Bug libstdc++/91486] New: future::wait_for and shared_timed_mutex::wait_for do not work properly with float duration

2019-08-18 Thread john.salmon at deshaw dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486 Bug ID: 91486 Summary: future::wait_for and shared_timed_mutex::wait_for do not work properly with float duration Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/91486] future::wait_for and shared_timed_mutex::wait_for do not work properly with float duration

2019-08-18 Thread john.salmon at deshaw dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486 --- Comment #2 from John Salmon --- The same incorrect logic that was fixed in bug 68519 is present in the implementations of future::wait_for and shared_timed_mutex::wait_for. The fix should be the same: explicitly duration_cast the __rtime

[Bug target/91472] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-08-18 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91472 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug target/83531] Build broken on macOS 10.13.2

2019-08-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83531 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Aug 18 18:54:13 2019 New Revision: 274624 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274624=gcc=rev Log: [Darwin, fixincludes] Fix PR83531 There is no reasonable chance that the SDKs in

[Bug fortran/91390] treatment of extra parameter in a subroutine call

2019-08-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91390 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 46726 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46726=edit Much better patch It a) does not try to do two things at once, and b) has passed regression-testing at least once.

[Bug target/91472] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-08-18 Thread glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91472 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- It can reproduced by simply cloning the gmp repo, building it and running the testsuite: $ hg clone https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp $ cd gmp $ ./.bootstrap && ./configure --enable-cxx --enable-fat

[Bug target/91472] gmp testsuite segfaults with gcc-8 and gcc-9, works fine with gcc-7

2019-08-18 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91472 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/91485] New: [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.)

2019-08-18 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91485 Bug ID: 91485 Summary: [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.) Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/91485] [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.)

2019-08-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91485 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug fortran/91485] [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.)

2019-08-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91485 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot

[Bug target/91441] ICE in asan_shadow_offset at asan.c:342 on riscv64 target

2019-08-18 Thread kito at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91441 --- Comment #2 from kito at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kito Date: Mon Aug 19 03:21:44 2019 New Revision: 274631 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274631=gcc=rev Log: PR target/91441 - Turn off -fsanitize=kernel-address if

[Bug fortran/91485] [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.)

2019-08-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91485 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Aug 19 03:21:46 2019 New Revision: 274632 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274632=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-18 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91485 module.c

[Bug target/91481] POWER9 "DARN" RNG intrinsic produces repeated output

2019-08-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91481 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/80834] PowerPC gcc -mcpu=power9 seems to turn off vectorization that -mcpu=power8 enables

2019-08-18 Thread helijia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80834 Li Jia He changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/91488] New: [9/10 Regression] char_traits::length causes "inlining failed in call to always_inline" error with -fgnu-tm -O2 -std=c++17

2019-08-18 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
pro (https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/RO-2Ec): #include int main() { auto z = std::char_traits::length(""); } $ g++ -fgnu-tm -O2 -std=c++17 In file included from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-20190818/include/c++/10.0.0/string:40, from :1: /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trun

[Bug fortran/91485] [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.)

2019-08-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91485 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Mon Aug 19 03:00:54 2019 New Revision: 274630 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274630=gcc=rev Log: 2019-08-18 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/91485 module.c

[Bug target/91441] ICE in asan_shadow_offset at asan.c:342 on riscv64 target

2019-08-18 Thread kito at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91441 kito at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/91485] [10 Regression] Erroneous conflict between variable x and operator(.x.)

2019-08-18 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91485 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/91487] New: [concepts] alias constraint not respected

2019-08-18 Thread frederik.engels24 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91487 Bug ID: 91487 Summary: [concepts] alias constraint not respected Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/80834] PowerPC gcc -mcpu=power9 seems to turn off vectorization that -mcpu=power8 enables

2019-08-18 Thread helijia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80834 Li Jia He changed: What|Removed |Added CC||helijia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4