[Bug c/91820] missing error diagnosis of '&' in initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91820 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c/92479] missing warnings for unreachable codes with break (i.e. revive the subset of -Wunreachable-code that fits under clang's -Wunreachable-code-break)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87403 Summary|missing

[Bug c/93031] Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer alignment, option to make GCC not assume it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/91839] missing error diagnosis for undeclared identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91839 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/92210] no warning for invariable used in loop condition (i.e. add clang's -Wfor-loop-analysis)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92210 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/92209] Imprecise column number for -Wstrict-prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92209 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/92954] -Wshadow does not report when a struct member shadows a global

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92954 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93033] New: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 Bug ID: 93033 Summary: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/93009] [9/10 Regression] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation since r265288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/93033] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced C++ code seems to be template class b { public: b(a *); ~b(); }; class c { struct C { b d; float e; }; c(); }; b f(b); c::c() { C a[]{f("")}; }

[Bug libstdc++/93034] New: variant not constexpr in c++17 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93034 Bug ID: 93034 Summary: variant not constexpr in c++17 mode Product: gcc Version: 7.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug sanitizer/89832] confusing error message when there is a problem with ASAN_OPTIONS "ERROR: expected '='"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89832 --- Comment #11 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi, (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > Fixed on trunk. I am trying to back port the fix for 89832 into our company's gcc8.2.1 release. by looking at the patch, it's huge, and it's

[Bug target/93009] [9/10 Regression] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation since r265288

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 47537 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47537=edit gcc10-pr93009.patch Untested fix. The bug is obvious, these *_bcst_1 patterns used =v,v 0,v v,0 m,m constraints but

[Bug c++/93033] [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/93033] [10 Regression] error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93033 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/92841] Optimize -fstack-protector-strong code generation a bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92841 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 08:23:42 2019 New Revision: 279633 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279633=gcc=rev Log: PR target/92841 * config/i386/i386.md (*stack_protect_set_3): For

[Bug target/93002] while(i--) optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93002 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 08:22:46 2019 New Revision: 279632 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279632=gcc=rev Log: PR target/93002 * config/i386/i386.md (dec reg; cmp $-1, reg; jne

[Bug analyzer/58237] gcc fails to detect obvious resource leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- Has this new code been tried out on gcc trunk or the linux kernel or a distribution like fedora or debian ? That might be the next phase of testing.

[Bug c++/92495] spaceship operator requires public member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92495 --- Comment #6 from Wilhelm M --- That meens, all NNTP of class type have to have all-public data members?

[Bug analyzer/58237] gcc fails to detect obvious resource leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- I tried out recent cppcheck on recent gcc trunk and found these resource leaks: trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:94:4: error: Resource leak: fp_in [resourceLeak]

[Bug tree-optimization/93023] New: give preference to address iv without offset in ivopts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93023 Bug ID: 93023 Summary: give preference to address iv without offset in ivopts Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/92495] spaceship operator requires public member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92495 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes.

[Bug fortran/92996] ICE in gfc_conv_array_constructor_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92996 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #22 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019 New Revision: 279639 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639=gcc=rev Log: Introduce -finline-arg-packing. 2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Dec 20 11:51:05 2019 New Revision: 279639 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279639=gcc=rev Log: Introduce -finline-arg-packing. 2019-12-20 Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/93025] New: [OpenACC] ICE with copy(y(1)%cc(:)%i) type of strided access – permitted since commit of OpenACC 2.6 deep copy patch series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93025 Bug ID: 93025 Summary: [OpenACC] ICE with copy(y(1)%cc(:)%i) type of strided access – permitted since commit of OpenACC 2.6 deep copy patch series Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/92975] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op, in tree-nested.c:1065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92975 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/93026] New: gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f – FAILs since r279531

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93026 Bug ID: 93026 Summary: gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f – FAILs since r279531 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/92738] [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 92738, which changed state. Bug 92738 Summary: [10 regression] Large code size growth for -O2 binaries between 2019-05-19...2019-05-29 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92738 What|Removed

[Bug c++/93018] Zero initialization not occurring for empty struct in member union when converting constructor is used with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93018 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug libstdc++/93024] New: Python Pretty Printers get disabled on executable reload by GDB

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93024 Bug ID: 93024 Summary: Python Pretty Printers get disabled on executable reload by GDB Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/93020] Final patches to build gcc-10 on GNU/Hurd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93020 --- Comment #2 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 47531 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47531=edit Fixes libgo syscall test

[Bug libstdc++/93024] Python Pretty Printers get disabled on executable reload by GDB

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93024 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems like a GDB bug not a libstdc++ one.

[Bug fortran/93025] [OpenACC] ICE with copy(y(1)%cc(:)%i) type of strided access – permitted since commit of OpenACC 2.6 deep copy patch series

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93025 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- See also: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01439.html with some longer comments and another remark.

[Bug middle-end/91512] [10 Regression] Fortran compile time regression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91512 --- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig --- Could you check if this still occurs if you use -finline-arg-packing?

[Bug c++/93027] New: ICE: in match_reload, at lra-constraints.c:1060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93027 Bug ID: 93027 Summary: ICE: in match_reload, at lra-constraints.c:1060 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/92791] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2311 since r278645

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92791 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/93020] Final patches to build gcc-10 on GNU/Hurd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93020 --- Comment #1 from Svante Signell --- Created attachment 47530 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47530=edit Fixes libgo os test.

[Bug fortran/92586] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13479 with nested allocatable derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586 --- Comment #7 from epagone --- Many thanks for looking into this, G. Steinmetz. Looking at your reduced cases, I understand that this is not related to character type. Should I remove the dependency to the meta bug "Fortran character"?

[Bug ipa/93015] [10 Regression] Segmentation fault (ipcp_store_vr_results(void))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93015 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/92996] ICE in gfc_conv_array_constructor_expr, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92996 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Dec 20 11:35:20 2019 New Revision: 279638 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279638=gcc=rev Log: Fortran] PR 92996 – fix rank resolution EXPR_ARRAY PR fortran/92996

[Bug fortran/92781] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op, at tree-nested.c:1065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92781 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/92591] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591 --- Comment #10 from Roman Zhuykov --- Author: zhroma Date: Fri Dec 20 15:05:12 2019 New Revision: 279642 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279642=gcc=rev Log: modulo-sched: backport PR92591 fix from mainline 2019-12-20 Roman Zhuykov

[Bug c++/2019] Wrong line number warning listing the previous declaration of a befriended function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2019 --- Comment #11 from Roman Zhuykov --- Author: zhroma Date: Fri Dec 20 15:50:44 2019 New Revision: 279646 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279646=gcc=rev Log: Backport: rename tests to reference the correct PR 2019-12-20 Roman Zhuykov

[Bug rtl-optimization/92591] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591 Roman Zhuykov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/58237] gcc fails to detect obvious resource leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4) > Patch committed to dmalcolm/analyzer branch: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01425.html > Ought to be live on godbolt.org within the next 24

[Bug libgomp/93029] New: [OpenACC] no_create fails with component use of aggregated types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93029 Bug ID: 93029 Summary: [OpenACC] no_create fails with component use of aggregated types Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc

[Bug libstdc++/92927] Bootstrap failed with CXXFLAGS="-O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- As these functions were already inline the right fix is just to restore that for C++11. If that wasn't the case, an alternative fix would be to explicitly instantiate them in the library by adding this to

[Bug c++/2019] Wrong line number warning listing the previous declaration of a befriended function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2019 --- Comment #12 from Roman Zhuykov --- Author: zhroma Date: Fri Dec 20 15:52:02 2019 New Revision: 279647 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279647=gcc=rev Log: Backport: rename tests to reference the correct PR 2019-12-20 Roman Zhuykov

[Bug libgomp/93030] New: [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93030 Bug ID: 93030 Summary: [OpenACC] libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/deep-copy-10.c FAILS on AMDGCN – invalid 'async' usage? Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/93018] Zero initialization not occurring for empty struct in member union when converting constructor is used with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93018 --- Comment #3 from John Drouhard --- I don't think this is a matter of object lifetime. Passing -fnolifetime-dse or -flifetime-dse=1 does not change the generated assembly here at all. As a user of the functions baz1 and baz2, I would expect

[Bug rtl-optimization/90040] [meta-bug] modulo-scheduler and partitioning issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90040 --- Comment #2 from Roman Zhuykov --- Same ICE also appears when compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71550.c with -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions -fmodulo-sched -freorder-blocks-and-partition on

[Bug c++/93028] New: internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.c:2073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028 Bug ID: 93028 Summary: internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.c:2073 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/92927] Bootstrap failed with CXXFLAGS="-O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- When the functions are not inline they are not instantiated by std::string at -O0: $ nm bad-stage1-src/c++11/string-inst.o | grep on_swap W

[Bug c++/2019] Wrong line number warning listing the previous declaration of a befriended function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2019 --- Comment #10 from Roman Zhuykov --- Author: zhroma Date: Fri Dec 20 15:40:46 2019 New Revision: 279645 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279645=gcc=rev Log: Rename tests to reference the correct PR 2019-12-20 Roman Zhuykov *

[Bug rtl-optimization/92591] ICE in optimize_sc, at modulo-sched.c:1063

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92591 --- Comment #11 from Roman Zhuykov --- Author: zhroma Date: Fri Dec 20 15:07:58 2019 New Revision: 279643 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279643=gcc=rev Log: modulo-sched: backport PR92591 fix from mainline 2019-12-20 Roman Zhuykov

[Bug ipa/93015] [10 Regression] Segmentation fault (ipcp_store_vr_results(void))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93015 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- I proposed a patch on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01451.html

[Bug c++/93028] internal compiler error: in write_type, at cp/mangle.c:2073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93028 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/93031] New: Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer alignment, option to make GCC not assume it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93031 Bug ID: 93031 Summary: Wish: When the underlying ISA does not force pointer alignment, option to make GCC not assume it Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug regression/93009] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 Matthias Hochsteger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug regression/93009] AVX512 FMA - wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93009 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Hochsteger --- Created attachment 47534 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47534=edit new code, cout results

[Bug c++/61414] enum class bitfield size-checking needs a separate warning flag controlling it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:00:02 2019 New Revision: 279654 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279654=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug libstdc++/92927] Bootstrap failed with CXXFLAGS="-O0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92927 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Dec 20 17:10:18 2019 New Revision: 279656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279656=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++: Add inline to maybe-constexpr functions (PR 92927) Originally these

[Bug fortran/91944] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:25:39 2019 New Revision: 279660 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279660=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/92524] [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:24:30 2019 New Revision: 279659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279659=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/92695] P1064R0 - virtual constexpr fails if object taken from array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92695 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:26:28 2019 New Revision: 279661 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279661=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-28 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug fortran/92781] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op, at tree-nested.c:1065

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92781 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:36:08 2019 New Revision: 279667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279667=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-05 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug analyzer/58237] gcc fails to detect obvious resource leaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58237 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6) > I tried out recent cppcheck on recent gcc trunk and found these resource > leaks: > > trunk/libvtv/scripts/sum-vtv-counts.c:94:4: error: Resource leak: fp_in

[Bug fortran/92756] [9 Regression] ICE in lower_omp, at omp-low.c:12988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:35:18 2019 New Revision: 279666 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279666=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/92756 * omp-low.c (check_omp_nesting_restrictions): If

[Bug target/92904] varargs for __int128 is placed at an unaligned location and uses movdqa for the load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92904 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:43:23 2019 New Revision: 279673 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279673=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-12 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/92930] [8/9 Regression] GCC incorrectly optimizes away __builtin_apply() calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:16 2019 New Revision: 279674 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279674=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/90492] simple array-copy not use available simd-registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90492 g.peterh...@t-online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.0 --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c/90677] [9 Regression] gcc-9.1.0 fails to build __gcc_diag__ souce: error: 'cgraph_node' is not defined as a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:56:30 2019 New Revision: 279650 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279650=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-22 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug debug/92664] Wrong .debug_line section information when compiling stdin input with -g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92664 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:23:34 2019 New Revision: 279658 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279658=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-27 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug ipa/92357] ICE in IPA pass fnsummary in openmp offload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92357 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:44:50 2019 New Revision: 279675 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279675=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-14 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug fortran/92977] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3526

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92977 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:45:56 2019 New Revision: 279676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279676=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-19 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug fortran/91944] [8 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:6156

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91944 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/92524] [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/90677] [9 Regression] gcc-9.1.0 fails to build __gcc_diag__ souce: error: 'cgraph_node' is not defined as a type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90677 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 92524, which changed state. Bug 92524 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in short program with constexpr and std::array https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92524 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/90842] [8 Regression] ICE in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/92438] [8/9/10 Regression] Function declaration parsed incorrectly with `-std=c++1z`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92438 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/92648] Handling of unknown attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92648 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:01:08 2019 New Revision: 279655 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279655=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/60228] ICE using lambda in #pragma omp declare reduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60228 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:30:38 2019 New Revision: 279662 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279662=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-29 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug c++/92732] Bit-field of scoped enumeration type cannot be initialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92732 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:34:14 2019 New Revision: 279665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279665=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-03 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug analyzer/93032] New: analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93032 Bug ID: 93032 Summary: analyzer fails to detect FILE * leak in zlib/contrib/minizip/mztools.c Product: gcc Version: analyzer branch Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/92899] [8/9 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:42:22 2019 New Revision: 279672 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279672=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug target/92723] [8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 17:41:17 2019 New Revision: 279671 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279671=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-12-11 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9.3+ too.

[Bug target/92723] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_shift_1, at expmed.c:2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug inline-asm/92615] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in

[Bug fortran/92775] [8 Regression] Incorrect expression in DW_AT_byte_stride on an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] Incorrect |[8 Regression] Incorrect

[Bug fortran/92756] [9 Regression] ICE in lower_omp, at omp-low.c:12988

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92756 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/92899] [8 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_atomic, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3769

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92899 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] [OpenMP] |[8 Regression] [OpenMP] ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/92930] [8 Regression] GCC incorrectly optimizes away __builtin_apply() calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92930 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] GCC|[8 Regression] GCC

[Bug c++/90842] [8/9 Regression] ICE in poplevel, at cp/decl.c:585

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90842 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:55:06 2019 New Revision: 279649 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279649=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/92644] [9 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1530

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92644 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:07 2019 New Revision: 279652 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279652=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug inline-asm/92615] [8/9 Regression] ICE in extract_insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92615 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:57:21 2019 New Revision: 279651 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279651=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-23 Jakub Jelinek PR

[Bug sanitizer/92154] new glibc breaks arm bootstrap due to libsanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92154 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Dec 20 16:58:35 2019 New Revision: 279653 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279653=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2019-11-26 Jakub Jelinek PR

  1   2   >