https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cd4eeefcc641dd70d026e08e9d218101b826c52
commit r10-6676-g9cd4eeefcc641dd70d026e08e9d218101b826c52
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93761
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
The modules branch identifies itself as:
gcc version 10.0.1 20200211 (experimental) [devel/c++-modules
fe76dae46c6:20200212-0942] (GCC)
I added the branch name to the [...] piece last week.
Its ICE and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93788
Bug ID: 93788
Summary: Segfault caused by infinite loop in cc1plus
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Not necessarily Fortran. It ICEs also on
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec36.C.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
The following compiles with free-form source code but shows for fixed-form
source code:
Error: Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface 'acc_create_async' for
‘acc_create_async_32_h’ at (1) and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93753
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Bug ID: 93786
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] gimplifier ICE with statement
expression since r8-5526
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93773
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Created attachment 47862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47862=edit
Testcase
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Looks like awkgram.y and awk.h - do you still have those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c03b53da9129ae2d5ac9629c4b874d0981a7d418
commit r10-6675-gc03b53da9129ae2d5ac9629c4b874d0981a7d418
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93789
Bug ID: 93789
Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_to_uhwi, at
tree.c:7361
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93582
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47863
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47863=edit
gcc10-pr93582-2-wip.patch
WIP on the merging from multiple stores. BIG_ENDIAN still not implemented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90378
--- Comment #3 from Maxim Kuvyrkov ---
The miscompilation went away for a while, but has reappeared just now after
commit 2a07345c4f8dabc286fc470e76c53473e5bc3eb7
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
Date: Fri Jan 31 14:26:26 2020 -0500
Fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
Bug ID: 93787
Summary: Rejects non-ambigous specific in generic –
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93776
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93791
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93791
Bug ID: 93791
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in
can_represent_integral_type_p, at real.c:5426
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93585
--- Comment #6 from Norman Goldstein ---
Thank you for that. I hadn't realized there was a -flto flag. It, indeed,
does warn for the mismatched types. The flag also causes the notice
note: code may be misoptimized unless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93789
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
--- Comment #7 from DIL ---
Please download the Updated ICE reproducer as I explain in the comments above
(the reproducer archive uploaded 2020-01-30). It builds with gcc/8.x just fine,
but causes ICE in gfortranc/9.x. As I mentioned, this ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Dávid Bolvanský from comment #2)
> Without LTO
>
> during IPA pass: analyzer
> common/entropy_common.c: In function ‘HUF_readStats’:
> common/entropy_common.c:196:37: internal compiler error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
Another typo: an extra space at the end
>"speculative call sequence ");
Another variable/diagnostic mismatch:
> error ("number of speculative targets %i mismatched with "
>
ars that ostream_iterator::difference_type is still void when -std=c++2a
is enabled.
* Branch: GCC trunk
* Version: g++ (GCC) 10.0.1 20200217 (experimental)
* Git Hash: cd23cdb1743b41baed0b937c4b359b9422490ca7
* GCC configured with: ../gcc/configure --disable-nls --disable-multilib
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93794
Bug ID: 93794
Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_component_ref, at
fortran/trans-expr.c:2497
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93709
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You are right, it was git g:6d099a76a0f6a040a3e678f2bce7fc69cc3257d8, r10-4161
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93795
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Seems unlikely to be a problem with the libstdc++ definition of std::invocable
rather than a compiler bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
Bug ID: 93792
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in gfc_code2string, at
fortran/misc.c:281
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93786
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93795
Bug ID: 93795
Summary: Out-of-line definition of class member template with
'requires std::invocable' constraint fails to
compile
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
Bug ID: 93796
Summary: typo: functoin
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93790
Bug ID: 93790
Summary: Cannot initialize reference from
std::reference_wrapper using direct- or
list-initialization syntax in GCC 10 c++2a mode
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93631
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93599
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I ran the test with the patch on several systems that had previously seen a lot
of failures. Even after running it several hundred thousand times there were
no failures seen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
Bug ID: 93797
Summary: typo: speculative_uid
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks. Both cases involve a casting from a NULL pointer type to a
REFERENCE_TYPE (the f90 case to a REAL_TYPE, the .C case to an INTEGER_TYPE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #2 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Without LTO
during IPA pass: analyzer
common/entropy_common.c: In function ‘HUF_readStats’:
common/entropy_common.c:196:37: internal compiler error: in
make_region_for_type, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
Dávid Bolvanský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93798
Bug ID: 93798
Summary: ICE in make_region_for_type
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93723
--- Comment #4 from Dávid Bolvanský ---
Thanks, created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93798
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93753
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> This patch is against svn r280157. The patch fixes the ICE.
> Someone will need to convert the example code into a test
> for the testsuite.
>
> It seems PDT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93775
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93751
Alexey Neyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #47845|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93797
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93775
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8cde6f9c223f1b6d4f4e4e07088f08a629b7c2a
commit r10-6686-gd8cde6f9c223f1b6d4f4e4e07088f08a629b7c2a
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93774
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93751
--- Comment #11 from Alexey Neyman ---
I decided to name the option `-gexternal-variables` - it seems more in-line
with the existing options (which omit "dwarf" from the option name even if the
option is only relevant to DWARF debugging info).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93778
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> But regardless of what language might have even looser rules than C/C++ in
> this area, it would seem like a rather unfortunate design limitation for GCC
> not to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
That's why I asked "What language relies on this?"
But regardless of what language might have even looser rules than C/C++ in this
area, it would seem like a rather unfortunate design limitation for GCC not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93777
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93798
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93457
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93792
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from David
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93796
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8def1d525c52f0f7fccd90f3c4624a8fe6c42882
commit r10-6688-g8def1d525c52f0f7fccd90f3c4624a8fe6c42882
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93765
--- Comment #2 from anton at mips dot complang.tuwien.ac.at ---
Created attachment 47859
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47859=edit
config.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93765
--- Comment #3 from anton at mips dot complang.tuwien.ac.at ---
Created attachment 47860
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47860=edit
config.status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93780
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 47858
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47858=edit
gcc10-pr93780.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
At this point can you instead try to create a small testcase showing the IPA
SRA issue? The malloc attribute isn't really invalid, it's just pointless.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
void *bar(const char*);
static void *__attribute__((malloc,noinline)) foo(const char *p)
{
return bar (p);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
foo (argv[0]);
return 0;
}
doesn't ICE on x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
The testcase reproduces the issue on x86_64 with
diff --git a/gcc/calls.c b/gcc/calls.c
index b5ccfaced37..d27c9fb67a7 100644
--- a/gcc/calls.c
+++ b/gcc/calls.c
@@ -3684,7 +3684,7 @@ expand_call (tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> void *bar(const char*);
> static void *__attribute__((malloc,noinline)) foo(const char *p)
> {
> return bar (p);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
>
> --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93782
Bug ID: 93782
Summary: ICE (segfault) while using TM in conjunction with
UBSAN
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
>
> I do:
>
> __attribute__((noinline, malloc))
> foo.isra (const char * p)
> {
>[local count: 1073741824]:
> bar (p_1(D)); [tail call]
> return;
>
> }
>
> main (int argc, char * * argv)
> {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93756
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1db97918101b2c22dfffa2242f13c7ea1b830558
commit r10-6669-g1db97918101b2c22dfffa2242f13c7ea1b830558
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93760
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e2dae50d2dced9896048e036e2c8bebfc65472c
commit r10-6671-g5e2dae50d2dced9896048e036e2c8bebfc65472c
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93755
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93756
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93755
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c83a55d8b4e66c9cd73b5177c2f06de274866d2c
commit r10-6670-gc83a55d8b4e66c9cd73b5177c2f06de274866d2c
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93760
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93771
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93771
>
> --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> The line where things crash is
> rtx temp = gen_reg_rtx (GET_MODE (valreg));
> but presumably valreg is just 0 here?
Yes:
(gdb) p valreg
$1 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
>
> --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Testing the patch. Points to a memleak in rs6000-driver.c:
>
> cache = detect_caches_linux ();
> /* PPC Linux does not provide any cache
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93759
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93781
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93730
--- Comment #3 from Akhilesh Kumar ---
Please find test application to reproduce this issue
bash-3.2# g++ -fdump-tree-all /tmp/akhilesh.cpp
during RTL pass: expand
/tmp/akhilesh.cpp: In function 'int main()':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(gdb) p debug_tree(exp)
>
side-effects nothrow
fn
unsigned DI
size
unit-size
align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1
structural-equality>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
It seems to me that ECF_MALLOC attribute is invalid on a function that has void
return type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93583
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93779
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93767
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Guenther :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abe13e1847fb91d43f02b5579c4230214d4369f4
commit r10-6668-gabe13e1847fb91d43f02b5579c4230214d4369f4
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*|
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93742
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93742
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Do you mean match_uaddsub_overflow in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |10.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93774
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
