https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
Bug ID: 95032
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294
since r11-187-g98329e3f5b85acc50d
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95032
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95033
Bug ID: 95033
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in set_parm_rtl, at
cfgexpand.c:1310 since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95033
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95031
Bug ID: 95031
Summary: GCC 10 Analyzer and fatal error: Terminated signal
terminated program cc1plus
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95012
--- Comment #3 from xantares09 at hotmail dot com ---
mingw does not define getpagesize as far as I can tell with:
$ grep -nr getpagesize /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/include/
but gcc seems to detect it (9.x and 10.x):
checking for getpagesize...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80711
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I would expect no false positives for a warning like this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94569
--- Comment #5 from Inbal Levi ---
Stumbled across another rule which might be relevant here is:
[basic.align/1]
[...] An object type imposes an alignment requirement on every object of that
type; stricter alignment can be requested using the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80711
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
A first approximation that is implemented in the wrong part of the compiler,
using the wrong logic, giving the wrong answers, is not a step in the right
direction because it would need to be completely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
Bug ID: 95036
Summary: ICE with variadic type/nttp template templates
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #7 from bin cheng ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> So I think the issue is not dependence testing but loop distribution
> accepting a
> zero dependence distance as OK. Of course dependence analysis is quite
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038
--- Comment #1 from Bill Long ---
Note that for the greatly simplified test case
> cat test3.f90
real(4) function x (a)
real(kind(x)) a(:)
print *, kind(x)
end function x
gfortran compiles with no error. So maybe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95034
Bug ID: 95034
Summary: Pattern for xor not converted to xor
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
) and 20200510
(4ae915cdbf0d8aec5bf4db9a6b37306e84f99766), gnat.dg/sso/p10.adb started to FAIL
on Solaris/SPARC (both 32 and 64-bit):
+FAIL: gnat.dg/sso/p10.adb -O0 output pattern test
+FAIL: gnat.dg/sso/p10.adb -O1 -fno-inline output pattern test
+FAIL: gnat.dg/sso/p10.adb -O2 output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95035
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95037
Bug ID: 95037
Summary: gfortran fails to compile a simple subroutine, issues
an opaque message
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80711
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> Might as well just start the right version and skip that first approximation.
It sounds to me like you are somewhat keen to implement.
Feel free to go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95013
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|iains at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038
Bug ID: 95038
Summary: Not treating function result name as a variable.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95003
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f09d898296c02d023ec51489fd233075ac553fd4
commit r10-8127-gf09d898296c02d023ec51489fd233075ac553fd4
Author: Iain Sandoe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95037
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93499
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95039
Bug ID: 95039
Summary: GCC 10 Analyzer and ‘‘result_decl’ not supported by
dump_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81319
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95042
Bug ID: 95042
Summary: ICE in can_merge_p, at analyzer/region-model.cc:2053
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95043
Bug ID: 95043
Summary: GCC 10 Analyzer and false positive on 'memcpy(dest,
src, count);'
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91867
me at myrrec dot space changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at myrrec dot space
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93499
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92ed82367e7ccf5e031e9cb7c653c14a2d64ca89
commit r11-255-g92ed82367e7ccf5e031e9cb7c653c14a2d64ca89
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95038
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94955
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||john at mcfarlane dot name
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95022
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95041
Bug ID: 95041
Summary: gdb does not prints variables inside an equivalence
statement in a module
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95044
Bug ID: 95044
Summary: -Wreturn-local-addr false alarm in GCC 10.1.0
(regression)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95040
Bug ID: 95040
Summary: typo in common.opt: manging
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
Bug 33056 depends on bug 50410, which changed state.
Bug 50410 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in record_reference, pointer
variable in data statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88745
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #12)
> Fixed.
Thanks, I backported the changeset to the (old) copy of libbacktrace I keep in
my fork of gdb and it only took a few tweaks to get it to compile.
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
Recent regression. Bisection points to g:283cb9ea6293e813e4
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 11.0.0 20200510 (experimental) [master revision
4ae915cdbf0:8eedda9eef3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95007
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 48502
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48502=edit
Assembly file on x86 with -O2 -funroll-loops
So, it seems the decisions made for unrolling are bad for this case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57933
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8da02efe62611a9f173c699a76010de5b916d33
commit r9-8583-gb8da02efe62611a9f173c699a76010de5b916d33
Author: Xionghu Luo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #37 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Fixed in 10.1.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44791
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81319
--- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca ---
This issue has been fixed in gcc 10.1.1-1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66364
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94969
--- Comment #8 from bin cheng ---
Root cause is in build_classic_dist_vector -> constant_access_functions which
adds unit distance vector only in case of constant access function. It should
cover invariant cases. Testing a patch. Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95036
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50551
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Still present at 10.1.1-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77273
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
271r.ce2 dump has
;; bb 0 artificial_defs: { d2(0){ }d5(1){ }d8(2){ }d9(6){ }d17(7){ }d34(16){
}d44(19){ }d47(20){ }d50(21){ }d53(22){ }d66(28){ }d69(29){ }d72(30){ }}
;; bb 0 artificial_uses: { }
;; lr in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79636
--- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca ---
This issue has been fixed long ago.
It should be closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0447929f11e6a3e1b076841712b90a8b6bc7d33a
commit r11-259-g0447929f11e6a3e1b076841712b90a8b6bc7d33a
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94086
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61900
Vittorio Zecca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
61 matches
Mail list logo
