https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f981395c220c9afd73be138294946e085e64af78
commit r11-289-gf981395c220c9afd73be138294946e085e64af78
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90748
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Using std::codecvt_utf8 fixes it:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fs_path.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/fs_path.h
@@ -836,8 +836,7 @@ namespace __detail
}
}
#else // ! windows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92654
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
commit r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92583
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
commit r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a048cbf33f54f4591eabf5f12
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Carlos O'Donell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carlos at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94835
Stephen Casner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Reduced:
template
struct Foo {
template
explicit(static_cast(true)) operator Foo();
};
template
template
Foo::operator Foo() {
return {};
}
int
main ()
{
Foo a;
Foo b = a;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95070
Bug ID: 95070
Summary: vec_cntlz_lsbb implementation uses BE semantics on LE
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4f157ed7749fd13c3562dd09696f7d675b86434f
commit r11-302-g4f157ed7749fd13c3562dd09696f7d675b86434f
Author: Ian Lance Taylor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95069
Bug ID: 95069
Summary: Capture by reference cannot use list-initalization
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi,
I was unable to find a performance problem, so I take back my
presumption of the original problem. I have checked two versions
of the preprocessed source, with
+#pragma GCC unroll 1
while
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
commit r11-288-g1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93499
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
commit r11-288-g1422c2e4462c9b7c44aa035ac56af77565556181
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95071
Bug ID: 95071
Summary: ICE on select type block with assumed-rank selector
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 91518, which changed state.
Bug 91518 Summary: [9 Regression] segfault when run CPU2006 465.tonto since
r263875
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91518
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 83403, which changed state.
Bug 83403 Summary: Missed register promotion opportunities in loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95066
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94766
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Bug ID: 95072
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive with flexible array
bounds (regression from GCC 9)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Ian Lance Taylor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbfa806e65c552e81b363756fd8e2925651f7333
commit r10-8134-gfbfa806e65c552e81b363756fd8e2925651f7333
Author: Ian Lance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Argh, this only works if the wide encoding happens to be UCS-4 (or for 16-bit
wchar_t, UCS-2) because std::codecvt_utf8 only supports converting between that
and UTF-8. Which is why I used std::codecvt in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried the update on the spec 2000/2006 tests that were ICEing before and they
compile now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95071
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #17 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
For this case, as you said, I also think it is better to avoid unrolling for
the loop.
'#pragma GCC unroll 1' could help to prevent the loop to be unrolled, even
someone compiles it with aggressive unroll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95073
Bug ID: 95073
Summary: Add "did you mean" when fn declaration could be found
via ADL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
Bug ID: 95074
Summary: Function found via ADL when it should not
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95074
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
This is where we're confused by the function introduced by M::f:
/* We do not perform argument-dependent lookup if
normal lookup finds a non-function, in accordance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 48503
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48503=edit
Patch candidate
Thank you for the bug report.
I'm sending a better patch, can you please test it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95042
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95031
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95048
Bug ID: 95048
Summary: wstring-constructor of std::filesystem::path throws
for non-ASCII characters
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
Bug ID: 95046
Summary: Vectorize V2SFmode operations
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95047
Bug ID: 95047
Summary: Wrong debug information for ternary operator at O0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
My creduced version is similar:
static a;
short b;
*c;
d() {
for (;; a--)
for (; b; b++) {
*c = 5;
if (a)
return;
}
}
Flag -O2 on x86_64 required. The code seems to compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3)
> It is fixed for gcc 10, probably by
> g:00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194.
Yes, it's fixed with this commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
$ cat pr95025.c
static int a;
short b;
int *c;
void d() {
for (;; a -= 1)
for (; b; b += 1) {
*c ^= 5;
if (a)
return;
}
}
$ gcc -O2 -c pr95025.c -Werror
during GIMPLE pass: lim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95031
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
It finished for me with ~16GB memory eaten in:
user3m59.520s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95033
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10a9bf806cf180915c20f9971d33da8ff2d663c1
commit r11-260-g10a9bf806cf180915c20f9971d33da8ff2d663c1
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95043
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95044
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95047
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC puts the line information as the line/collumn as the ':' part of the
ternary
opertator.
:
[t666.c:7:7] if (left_3(D) >= 0)
goto ; [INV]
else
goto ; [INV]
:
[t666.c:6:17] if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, this one is an interesting one (might be also latent before the rewrite).
I'll deal with it separately. The issue is around the inner loop having
multiple exits, one being also the exit from the outer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
Bug 33056 depends on bug 50410, which changed state.
Bug 50410 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in record_reference, pointer
variable in data statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95023
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||gcn
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
All right, I'll prepare a patch for that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> I see this bug also. Another C test case is available on request.
Please attach it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> Created attachment 48504 [details]
> C source code
I'm gonna reduce that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95040
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:850322dff702aa538919daf165d3dff5c8f723ca
commit r11-261-g850322dff702aa538919daf165d3dff5c8f723ca
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95025
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 48504
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48504=edit
C source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95047
--- Comment #2 from Luca Massarelli ---
Ok, so it seems that there is an inconsistency with -Og:
$ gcc -Og -g -o opt a.c
$ lldb opt
* thread #1, name = 'opt', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
frame #0: 0x004004bb opt`main at a.c:13:9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95040
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:340c711bc0835346000d7863155fbf82af42828e
commit r10-8129-g340c711bc0835346000d7863155fbf82af42828e
Author: Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95040
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #10 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
For power, the patch enables -funroll-loops (with small loops unroller in RTL)
and which also enabled the 'cunroll'(complete unroller) on tree.
For this loop(the inner loop), 'cunroll' figures out that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
I should note aarch64 and arm both use unsigned char as the default too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Michael Kuhn from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Thank you for the bug report.
> > I'm sending a better patch, can you please test it?
>
> I applied your patch on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052
Bug ID: 95052
Summary: Excess padding of partially initialized strings/char
arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #11 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
In general, 'cunroll' could help performance visibly on some workload, like
SPEC.
In this case, it may be in question if the performance is improved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95002
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
The "array," is added by c_expr_sizeof_expr:
if (c_vla_type_p (TREE_TYPE (folded_expr)))
{
/* sizeof is evaluated when given a vla (C99 6.5.3.4p2). */
ret.value = build2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Most Fortran arrays are one- or two-dimensional.
Assuming a 10*10 two-dimensional array that is being packed, the
condition will be tested 121 times and the loop body will be entered
12 times. Only once
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95049
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2653784e500eccf5d5c2518914b1d9663fe63648
commit r10-8131-g2653784e500eccf5d5c2518914b1d9663fe63648
Author: Mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
Bug ID: 95051
Summary: error: invalid RHS for gimple memory store:
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95044
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Peeling off the first iteration might be the answer. Thread jumping could do
that but normally is not used for that, especially through other condtionals.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Flags required:
-w -O2 -std=gnu90 -fsanitize=kernel-address --param=asan-stack=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #13 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
In this case, the loop body execution is at most a given number, but not an
exact number. It would be only some iterations are executed at runtime. As
above said this may false for 'while (count[n] ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95046
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c355156aa20eaec7401d7c66f6a6cfbe597abc2
commit r11-263-g7c355156aa20eaec7401d7c66f6a6cfbe597abc2
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95051
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code:
struct a {
struct {
struct {
int b
} c
}
};
struct d {
struct {
int e
} f
} g(h) {
struct a *i;
struct d *j =
i->c.b = j->f.e;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94928
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95018
--- Comment #12 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
> executed at most 13 times. Then the complete unroller could handle this loop.
Correction: 13+1 times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbeaa7ab81a37acadc9af6e7990332604252de20
commit r11-262-gdbeaa7ab81a37acadc9af6e7990332604252de20
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95050
Bug ID: 95050
Summary: coroutine: no "mandatory copy elision" for prvalue
await_resume expression.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95035
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95035
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95049
Bug ID: 95049
Summary: GCC never terminates with trivial input program
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95044
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I think there is another very similar bug report.
# buf_1 = PHI <_buf(2), buf_15(6)>
[...]
if (_buf != buf_1)
in each branch, we thus know what buf_1 is, so we could replace it with buf_15
in
# _3 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95047
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is because when GCC does for -Og:
[t666.c:6:12] _1 = left_6(D) >= 0;
[t666.c:6:34] _2 = right_7(D) >= 0;
[t666.c:6:17] _3 = _1 & _2;
[t666.c:7:7] if (_3 != 0)
This "optimization" happens at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kuhn ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Thank you for the bug report.
> I'm sending a better patch, can you please test it?
I applied your patch on top of the GCC 10.1.0 tarball. Sadly, it still fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94981
--- Comment #8 from Tony Reix ---
On fedora31/x86_64, when compiling with -funsigned-char, some parts of Boost
math do not compile. With some changes like: static_cast(-5) , it is easy to
make these tests to work both with -fsigned-char or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95053
Bug ID: 95053
Summary: [11.0 regression] ICE in f951: gfc_divide()
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a17beaecadf10d1c9c44d2b31eedc11dfdea35a
commit r9-8584-g5a17beaecadf10d1c9c44d2b31eedc11dfdea35a
Author: Mark Eggleston
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
