[Bug tree-optimization/95424] Failure to optimize division with numerator of 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/95472] various diagnostics for C/C++ hyperlinks to gfortran doc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95472 --- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao --- Well, seems fixed by Jakub at efaffc69 (in master) and a764bbb7 (in gcc-10) so far.

[Bug libstdc++/90102] Incorrect ambiguous overload with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 --- Comment #37 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 > > --- Comment #36 from Jiu Fu Guo --- > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment

[Bug analyzer/95152] ICE in get_or_create_mem_ref, at analyzer/region-model.cc:6938 since r10-5950-g757bf1dff5e8cee3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95152 yagi uwu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yagi.uwu at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/95425] Failure to optimize bit twiddling on statics that does nothing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95425 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/95423] Failure to optimize separated multiplications by x and square of x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95423 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-02

[Bug fortran/93814] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in build_entry_thunks, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93814 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/95433] Failure to completely optimize simple compare after operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95433 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, are we supposed to solve/simplify arbitrary linear equations? 3 * x * x * x + 5 == 8 is equal to x == 1. 3 * x * x + 5 == 8 is equal to abs(x) == 1. But sure, simple cases. I wonder if something

[Bug target/95436] [11 Regression] ICE in store_expr, at expr.c:5845 since r11-711-g43a4fc095e30188392cc42299c4081297e321104

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/95474] New: class member array cannot be mapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95474 Bug ID: 95474 Summary: class member array cannot be mapped Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/95450] [10/11 regression] Wrong long double folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95450 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |10.1.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/95451] [8/9/10/11 regression] ICE for lambda capturing this and calling operator() since r8-2720-gf44a8dd56f5bfbd0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Summary|[8/9/10

[Bug c++/95475] Imprecise column number of runtime error in unreachable program point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95475 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The question is where should it be, at the open of the () or the start of the identifier __builtin_unreachable ? In C++, it is the open. In C, it is the start.

[Bug tree-optimization/94274] fold phi whose incoming args are defined from binary operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94274 --- Comment #5 from z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com --- Created attachment 48659 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48659=edit Fold phi whose incoming args are defined from binary operations I tried to make a patch to do this

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/95460] ICE in execute, at adjust-alignment.c:74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95460 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/95469] [11 regression] several vperm test case failures after r11-736 on power 9 (only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95469 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Target|

[Bug c++/95475] Imprecise column number of runtime error in unreachable program point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95475 --- Comment #2 from Haoxin Tu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The question is where should it be, at the open of the () or the start of > the identifier __builtin_unreachable ? In C++, it is the open. In C, it is > the start.

[Bug tree-optimization/95448] Missing optimization: pointer untag, re-tag should be no-op

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95448 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #23 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 48660 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48660=edit work-in-progress patch There's patch that does not stream all zero counters for a function. The patch only supports

[Bug c++/95475] New: Imprecise column number of runtime error in unreachable program point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95475 Bug ID: 95475 Summary: Imprecise column number of runtime error in unreachable program point Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/95416] Several gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- I've since run Solaris bootstraps with gld: all the failures are gone. Conversely, in a Linux/i686 bootstrap with gld and --disable-lto-plugin, they do occur just as on Solaris with the native ld.

[Bug driver/95456] [11 Regression] gcc/gcc.c:6035:16: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95456 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I wonder where we'd simplify things like (insn 67 66 68 3 (parallel [ (set (strict_low_part (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ]) 0)) (ior:QI (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 94 [ a ]) 0)

[Bug middle-end/95472] various diagnostics for C/C++ hyperlinks to gfortran doc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95472 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/95450] [10/11 regression] Wrong long double folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95450 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- No, it doesn't.

[Bug target/95420] arm-wrs-vxworks7: xgcc: error: unrecognised -mcpu target: armv7-a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95420 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86b14bb1a93d8ef01678d132013a2006a4f00deb commit r11-786-g86b14bb1a93d8ef01678d132013a2006a4f00deb Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug target/95420] arm-wrs-vxworks7: xgcc: error: unrecognised -mcpu target: armv7-a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95420 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89b625be0aab128b2316a937881147cd4a2e354a commit r10-8221-g89b625be0aab128b2316a937881147cd4a2e354a Author: Iain Buclaw

[Bug fortran/95476] New: Reading file of length zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95476 Bug ID: 95476 Summary: Reading file of length zero Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/95471] vrndvq_f32 not supported on armv8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95471 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/95464] [10/11 Regression] Miscompilation of mesa on x86_64-linux since r10-6426

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/95475] Imprecise column number of runtime error in unreachable program point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95475 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug driver/95456] [11 Regression] gcc/gcc.c:6035:16: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95456 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95474] class member array cannot be mapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95474 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/95467] ICE in parse_omp_structured_block: OpenMP Offload (target_parallel__simd)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95467 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/49854] Clean up SPE/e500 option handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- Demangling the function names in the assembly output gcov_counter_add(long long*, long long, int) ... bl .__atomic_fetch_add_8 gcov_counter_set_if_null(long long*, gcov_kvp*, int) ... bl

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #6) > Created attachment 48658 [details] > i386-Implement-ROUND_TYPE_ALIGN-to-make-sure-alignme.patch > > Some optimization might made decision depend on the alignment, and

[Bug c++/95349] Using std::launder(p) produces unexpected behavior where (p) produces expected behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Downing from comment #15) > This is all kind of besides the point anyway though, because gcc is handling > everything ok except for std::launder. std::launder is only supposed to be >

[Bug jit/95426] libgccjit.so: error: RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95426 --- Comment #6 from bouanto at zoho dot com --- Any idea how I should change the generated code to make it work? Or will a patch not require changing the generated code? Thanks.

[Bug c++/92633] [concepts] constrained lambda with placehoder syntax getting wrong substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92633 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- *** Bug 93154 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/93154] can't constrain captured functions to be invocable w/ lambda arg - func/lambda template args mixed up?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93154 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug fortran/95467] ICE in parse_omp_structured_block: OpenMP Offload (target_parallel__simd)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95467 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Applencorut --- Yes, it's indeed working. It's because I made a typo in the reproducer. I Didn't copy the version who produce the ICE (should have been !$OMP END TARGET PARALLEL and not !$OMP END PARALLEL). Sorry about

[Bug c++/95474] class member array cannot be mapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95474 --- Comment #2 from Ye Luo --- @jakub could you mention which page and line in 4.5 spec this code violates? https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf

[Bug c++/95474] class member array cannot be mapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95474 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- 4.0 had a clear "A variable that is part of another variable (such as a field of a structure) but is not an array element or an array section cannot appear in a map clause." restriction, this has been lifted

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 48661 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48661=edit Patch candidate @David: Can you please test the patch?

[Bug c++/95474] class member array cannot be mapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95474 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Hopefully this year. What you can do in the meantime is auto *mydata = data; and use mydata instead of data.

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- AIX build is happier with the patch

[Bug jit/95426] libgccjit.so: error: RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95426 --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm --- Looks like the way libgccjit sets up attributes (such as "noreturn") on builtins has somehow become a no-op. Am investigating.

[Bug middle-end/95473] GCC misses -Wnull-dereference warning in a simple code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95473 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 --- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn --- $ nm -BCpg libgcov-merge-tool.o | grep _8 - U .__atomic_fetch_add_8 - U .__sync_val_compare_and_swap_8

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 --- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn --- The references only occur when compiling without optimization during stage1.

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/95474] class member array cannot be mapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95474 --- Comment #4 from Ye Luo --- Thanks. Hopefully this part of 5.0 feature will be implemented in the near future.

[Bug c++/95349] Using std::launder(p) produces unexpected behavior where (p) produces expected behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349 --- Comment #23 from Andrew Downing --- But gcc already can implement std::start_lifetime_as with no overhead. https://godbolt.org/z/YdoEcH My intent wasn't to draw attention to std::start_lifetime_as in this bug report, I only mentioned it as

[Bug target/95469] [11 regression] several vperm test case failures after r11-736 on power 9 (only)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95469 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/95478] New: CPP stack pointer SP is 0x5d but assembly shows __SP_L_ at 0x3d (target AVR MEGA2560)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95478 Bug ID: 95478 Summary: CPP stack pointer SP is 0x5d but assembly shows __SP_L_ at 0x3d (target AVR MEGA2560) Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/95479] New: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95479 Bug ID: 95479 Summary: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:271 Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] New: GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 Bug ID: 95480 Summary: GCOV change breaks AIX build Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: gcov-profile

[Bug gcov-profile/95480] GCOV change breaks AIX build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95480 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- I have a patch candidate and I know the root cause of the patch.

[Bug middle-end/95461] GCC misses -Warray-bounds warning message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95461 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 95473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/95479] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:271

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95479 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug fortran/95467] ICE in parse_omp_structured_block: OpenMP Offload (target_parallel__simd)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95467 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/95395] gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-11.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95395 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/92633] [concepts] constrained lambda with placehoder syntax getting wrong substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92633 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||db0451 at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/89661] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_61.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661 Manfred Schwarb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manfred99 at gmx dot ch --- Comment

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 > > --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to Kito Cheng from comment #6) > >

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9) > > > > The i386 psABI specifies 4 byte alignment for long long. But we want to > > > use 8 byte alignment if there is no

[Bug middle-end/95395] gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-11.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95395 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bd4508f86889995f6864bf50773bd6859951007 commit r11-825-g0bd4508f86889995f6864bf50773bd6859951007 Author: Eric Botcazou Date:

[Bug c++/95477] New: [coroutines] coroutine result object not properly freed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95477 Bug ID: 95477 Summary: [coroutines] coroutine result object not properly freed Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95349] Using std::launder(p) produces unexpected behavior where (p) produces expected behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Smith from comment #20) > (In reply to Andrew Downing from comment #19) > > Not that it would make a difference in this particular situation, but is the > > intent of P0593R6 to only

[Bug jit/95426] libgccjit.so: error: RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95426 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- This seems like a bug with how libgccjit interacts with __builtin_unreachable, sorry. As a workaround, try removing the __builtin_unreachable calls for now.

[Bug c++/95020] requires expression always evaluates to true in the definition of template lambda defined within template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95020 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0971201a1e5e1e5df7de666ea1c4b2605a51cc76 commit r10-8222-g0971201a1e5e1e5df7de666ea1c4b2605a51cc76 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 > > --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > (In

[Bug c++/92633] [concepts] constrained lambda with placehoder syntax getting wrong substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92633 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40912c25b57b4e21aae20a4896624387aa13f7ed commit r10-8223-g40912c25b57b4e21aae20a4896624387aa13f7ed Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/92838] ICE (internal compiler error) calling lambda object with requires clause (in in dependent_type_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92838 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40912c25b57b4e21aae20a4896624387aa13f7ed commit r10-8223-g40912c25b57b4e21aae20a4896624387aa13f7ed Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/92633] [concepts] constrained lambda with placehoder syntax getting wrong substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92633 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 92633, which changed state. Bug 92633 Summary: [concepts] constrained lambda with placehoder syntax getting wrong substitution https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92633 What|Removed

[Bug c++/92838] ICE (internal compiler error) calling lambda object with requires clause (in in dependent_type_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92838 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 92633, which changed state. Bug 92633 Summary: [concepts] constrained lambda with placehoder syntax getting wrong substitution https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92633 What|Removed

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #9) > > The i386 psABI specifies 4 byte alignment for long long. But we want to > > use 8 byte alignment if there is no ABI implication and no stack realignment > >

[Bug c++/93152] derived_from on lambda arg causes ICE / uses wrong base, for some orders of template args on containing function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93152 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/95020] requires expression always evaluates to true in the definition of template lambda defined within template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95020 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 95020, which changed state. Bug 95020 Summary: requires expression always evaluates to true in the definition of template lambda defined within template function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95020

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 95020, which changed state. Bug 95020 Summary: requires expression always evaluates to true in the definition of template lambda defined within template function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95020

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 > > --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug debug/95482] New: Feature request: add -gsplit-dwarf=single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95482 Bug ID: 95482 Summary: Feature request: add -gsplit-dwarf=single Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/95349] Using std::launder(p) produces unexpected behavior where (p) produces expected behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349 --- Comment #25 from Andrew Downing --- Do you know how to change that example so that gcc's knowledge is incomplete and it not longer does the correct thing?

[Bug libstdc++/90102] Incorrect ambiguous overload with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90102 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/95459] aarch64: ICE in aarch64_short_vector_p, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:16803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95459 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/95471] vrndvq_f32 not supported on armv8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95471 --- Comment #2 from Evan Nemerson --- In that case shouldn't the header be adjusted to not define the vrndvq_f32 function unless it is enabled? It is already guarded by a check for __ARM_ARCH >= 8 (see

[Bug c++/95050] coroutine: no "mandatory copy elision" for prvalue await_resume expression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95050 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:324276ff9b1aa5128e5cb9f5d43182d1ebab0752 commit r11-835-g324276ff9b1aa5128e5cb9f5d43182d1ebab0752 Author: Iain Sandoe Date: Tue

[Bug c++/95484] New: Friend declaration of member function template has no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95484 Bug ID: 95484 Summary: Friend declaration of member function template has no effect Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/92103] constraints not checked on nested class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92103 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95349] Using std::launder(p) produces unexpected behavior where (p) produces expected behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95349 --- Comment #26 from Andrew Downing --- I mean without modifying the definition of start_lifetime_as

[Bug target/95459] aarch64: ICE in aarch64_short_vector_p, at config/aarch64/aarch64.c:16803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95459 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2672dd630c81513e08829adc63294ffeedf5693 commit r11-833-gb2672dd630c81513e08829adc63294ffeedf5693 Author: Fei Yang Date: Tue

[Bug c++/95193] [11 Regression] ICE in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:14624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95193 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b68cb38ddca37a14a6f2f43de3a6d396ee1bc79 commit r11-838-g4b68cb38ddca37a14a6f2f43de3a6d396ee1bc79 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug target/95347] rs6000 mcpu=future generating stfs instead of pstfs for pc-relative references

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95347 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aaron Sawdey : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85bce484d37fdda9c7eadb9bdcdb1ded891462bb commit r11-830-g85bce484d37fdda9c7eadb9bdcdb1ded891462bb Author: Aaron Sawdey Date: Fri

  1   2   >