[Bug target/96347] note: non-delegitimized UNSPEC UNSPEC_TP (19) found in variable location

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96347 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48946|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/53957] Polyhedron 11 benchmark: MP_PROP_DESIGN twice as long as other compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53957 --- Comment #25 from Anthony --- (In reply to Anthony from comment #24) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #23) > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, prop_design at protonmail dot com wrote: > > > > >

[Bug c/96383] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #2 from Ben Woodard --- Created attachment 48955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48955=edit gcc binary

[Bug c/96383] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #1 from Ben Woodard --- Created attachment 48954 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48954=edit clang binary

[Bug c++/91212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] const ignored for ctor arguments within return since r8-2493-g4ce8c5dea53d8073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91212 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:81bc0ec3e926d7a2c90502847ddaacf3d56d5b75 commit r11-2411-g81bc0ec3e926d7a2c90502847ddaacf3d56d5b75 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug c++/91427] Implement P1825R0, Merged wording for P0527R1 and P1155R3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91427 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1722e2013f05f1f1f99379dbaa0c0df356da731f commit r11-2412-g1722e2013f05f1f1f99379dbaa0c0df356da731f Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug lto/96385] New: GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Bug ID: 96385 Summary: GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/96384] New: [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 Bug ID: 96384 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/96384] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-29 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/96384] [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overflow= storing into multidimensional array with index in range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96384 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- It looks like a false positive caused by the weirdo signed vs unsigned conversions between wide_int and offset_int. It happens in this piece of code in compute_objsize: offset_int orng[2]; tree

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- Hi Paul, Not sure how the UK is handling the pandemic. Here, in Washington we have 4 phases. Phase 1 has the most restrictions and phase 4 is the pandemic is over. Most of Washington made it into phase 2

[Bug libstdc++/96382] New: const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96382 Bug ID: 96382 Summary: const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/96382] [11 Regression] const_reverse_iterator() ctor is rejected in c++98

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96382 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/89772] memchr for a character not in constant nul-padded string not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89772 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/96383] New: Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 Bug ID: 96383 Summary: Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/92729] [avr] Convert the backend to MODE_CC so it can be kept in future releases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92729 pipcet at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pipcet at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/96106] [10/11 Regression] A friend abbreviated template function denies access to private members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96106 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f31dd9beb95f4beda1d2bd5c0526c42d0ce455c4 commit r11-2418-gf31dd9beb95f4beda1d2bd5c0526c42d0ce455c4 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug c++/95486] ICE for alias CTAD with non-dependent argument and constrained constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71141b1bd537cc516e485c834c2d36abba3f4544 commit r11-2419-g71141b1bd537cc516e485c834c2d36abba3f4544 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug debug/96383] Full ABI information missing missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 --- Comment #3 from Ben Woodard --- This also affects C++ but in that case some info can be derived due to mangling.

[Bug ipa/96352] inflated text section with ipa inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96352 --- Comment #2 from jojo --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > It was a bugfix. If you want to have small binaries use -Os. You can also > tune the inliner with various knobs, the most important maybe > --param inline-unit-growth

[Bug c++/96331] Class template argument deduction (CTAD) with Concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96331 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from TC

[Bug other/92396] -ftime-trace support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92396 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug lto/96343] LTO ICE on PPC64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96343 Axel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from

[Bug tree-optimization/95679] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/95679] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/96206] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96206 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48949 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48949=edit gcc11-pr96354.patch Untested fix.

[Bug ipa/96337] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2: twice as slow for -O2 -march=x86-64 vs. GCC 9.3/8.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96337 --- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov --- Michael has admitted that might be a specific CPU relate regression: > Been running some more tests today: > - Tried on a i9-10980XE Cascade Lake and Cascade Lake Xeon systems and did > not

[Bug tree-optimization/95679] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- r11-1146-g1396fa5b91cfa0b3

[Bug tree-optimization/96075] [8/9 Regression] bogus alignment for negative step grouped access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > Likely started with r8-568-gf9f69dd651b2f103. Very unlikely (IVOPTS runs after vectorization)

[Bug tree-optimization/95679] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- And the ICE was mitigated by g:8fb4d1d58362b77da78c09740c6b5562124a369e but the 'changed' flag still is missing.

[Bug preprocessor/95889] [10 regression] __has_include broken with -traditional-cpp (and therefore with Fortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95889 Tiziano Müller changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|__has_include evaluated |[10 regression]

[Bug c++/96282] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96282 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection,| |needs-reduction

[Bug c/96365] New: GCC report impossible constraint on possible inline assembly output constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96365 Bug ID: 96365 Summary: GCC report impossible constraint on possible inline assembly output constraints Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/96365] GCC report impossible constraint on possible inline assembly output constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96365 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/96075] [8/9 Regression] bogus alignment for negative step grouped access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- Likely started with r8-568-gf9f69dd651b2f103. after: .L7: movapd y+8176(%rax), %xmm0 movq%rax, %rdx subq$16, %rax negq%rdx cmpq$-8192, %rax

[Bug tree-optimization/95679] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e8792a347c87dbb82b4cf75ec3452bc5cd1d3db commit r11-2400-g8e8792a347c87dbb82b4cf75ec3452bc5cd1d3db Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/95679] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6231

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- We have indeed: # DEBUG D#2 => MEM[(double *)&] and on the caller side: D.2566[_9] = foo<3, 3> (D.2559, D.2572); [return slot optimization] So, that is why to & [_9] is propagated. Now, if I add to foo

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6af8284719d151087a1c1e4da210cc5a9fa4a478 commit r11-2403-g6af8284719d151087a1c1e4da210cc5a9fa4a478 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug target/96366] New: [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96366 Bug ID: 96366 Summary: [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- > We have indeed: > # DEBUG D#2 =>

[Bug tree-optimization/96349] [10 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 3 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.) [in fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96349 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[10/11

[Bug tree-optimization/96349] [10/11 Regression] ICE: SSA corruption (Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 3 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.) [in fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96349 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b2f3867c09c8977268b8ffbd646ac242188b335 commit r11-2402-g2b2f3867c09c8977268b8ffbd646ac242188b335 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- > But we need to do the regimplification

[Bug debug/88878] .debug_pubnames/types empty with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88878 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---

[Bug c++/95599] [coroutines] destructor for temporary operand to co_yield expression called before end of full-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95599 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 commit r10-8545-gf43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/95895] internal compiler error: in captures_temporary, at cp/coroutines.cc:2717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95895 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 commit r10-8545-gf43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/95823] [coroutines] compiler internal error in captures_temporary,

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95823 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 commit r10-8545-gf43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c++/95591] [coroutines] ICE when co_yielding string literal from generator coroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95591 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 commit r10-8545-gf43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug c/96365] GCC report impossible constraint on possible inline assembly output constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96365 --- Comment #2 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Any reason why you can't just write "=a"(x), "=b"(y), "=c"(z) if you mean > that as the only possibility? Emm, I was studying the

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > Created attachment 48949 [details] > gcc11-pr96354.patch > > Untested fix. So I wonder where exactly we get this non-invariant address from and what makes

[Bug c++/95824] [coroutines] compiler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95824 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 commit r10-8545-gf43a1b1d1718969423337190ddbbbc9037c67783 Author: Iain Sandoe

[Bug fortran/45424] [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424 Bug 45424 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2e99836a2751b6d970ca6e50c1a368f5d2a2375 commit r11-2398-gc2e99836a2751b6d970ca6e50c1a368f5d2a2375 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- OK, looks like inlining C<3>::C into foo<3, 3> produces this debug stmt. foo<3, 3> (struct D D.2506, struct C D.2507) { : C<3>::C (&); return ; and inlined from C<3>::C (struct C * const this) {

[Bug c++/96363] bogus error with constrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- But we need to do the regimplification for several other reasons, so what would be the advantage of doing it that way?

[Bug c/96367] New: bogus format truncation error on armhf when building perf with gcc 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96367 Bug ID: 96367 Summary: bogus format truncation error on armhf when building perf with gcc 10 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/88878] .debug_pubnames/types empty with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88878 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #7) > Hello, @rguenth could you suggest what problem does -fdebug-types-section > -flto still have? > When I remove the use_debug_types's "&& !in_lto_p" part it

[Bug target/35488] A incorrect result in a simple division, only in 32-bit gcc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35488 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c/96368] New: False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Bug ID: 96368 Summary: False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/95096] Feature request: add -fsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8d3f2b6d1d81535ac3b71fd8dd1def12f8d03b3 commit r11-2407-gc8d3f2b6d1d81535ac3b71fd8dd1def12f8d03b3 Author: Fangrui Song Date:

[Bug debug/95096] Feature request: add -fsplit-dwarf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95096 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/96369] New: Wrong evaluation order of || operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96369 Bug ID: 96369 Summary: Wrong evaluation order of || operator Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c4d2b867666464fad2dc5732940beaae48d8628 commit r10-8549-g3c4d2b867666464fad2dc5732940beaae48d8628 Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- But doing that would mean pretty much the same amount of code at the expense of making the IL larger even when not needed (and perhaps risking some optimization opportunities). Yet another possibility would

[Bug preprocessor/95889] [10 regression] __has_include broken with -traditional-cpp (and therefore with Fortran)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95889 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 > > --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- > But doing that would mean pretty much the

[Bug c++/59254] confusing diagnostic for undefined template shadowed by declaration in inline namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59254 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-03-23 00:00:00 |2020-7-29 --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/96366] [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96366 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot

[Bug debug/93951] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE with '-flto -g -femit-struct-debug-baseonly'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93951 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/45424] [F08] Add IS_CONTIGUOUS intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424 Bug 45424 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug fortran/56818] [meta-bug] fortran-dev bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818 Bug 56818 depends on bug 53298, which changed state. Bug 53298 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/93295] ICE in alias_ctad_tweaks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295 ofee oficsu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oficsu at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/96361] return type not deduced for a function template specialization given as argument of a template function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96361 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||okannen at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/88878] .debug_pubnames/types empty with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88878 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > The .debug_types section isn't supposed to be output when in_lto_p > (that's for the LTRANS units where we generally do not output any > types into DWARF).

[Bug c++/92944] [concepts] redefinition error when using constrained structure template inside namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92944 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-29 Blocks|

[Bug c++/96363] bogus error with constrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-07-29 See Also|

[Bug fortran/96319] Don't warn for LOGICAL kind conversion with -Wconversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96319 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug c/96370] New: ice with -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96370 Bug ID: 96370 Summary: ice with -ffast-math Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c/96368] False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Salamandar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #2 from Salamandar

[Bug target/96377] New: [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 Bug ID: 96377 Summary: [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug middle-end/96300] missing -Wuninitialized reading a struct member by a conditionally assigned pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96300 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/96367] bogus -Wformat-truncation in ILP32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96367 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/96368] False negative with maybe-uninitialized with goto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96368 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:54:59PM +, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas --- > (In reply to kargl from comment #10) > > (In reply to jvdelisle from comment #9) > > > I

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the problem is that c_common_type does: 742 if (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t1) != NULL_TREE) 743 t1 = build_type_attribute_variant (t1, NULL_TREE); 744 745 if (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (t2) !=

[Bug bootstrap/96378] New: ICE: Solaris/SPARCv9 bootstrap stage2 segfault compiling stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96378 Bug ID: 96378 Summary: ICE: Solaris/SPARCv9 bootstrap stage2 segfault compiling stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/96379] New: [ 10/11 Regression ] GCC accepts totally invalid template declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96379 Bug ID: 96379 Summary: [ 10/11 Regression ] GCC accepts totally invalid template declaration Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- This dates back to https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00288.html Dunno, do we want to never strip attributes from VECTOR_TYPEs and only strip them that way from non-VECTOR_TYPEs? Or only

[Bug c++/96310] Ignoring Wnonnull via pragma gcc diagnostics still produces a unwanted note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96310 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- I've been thinking about that too but not really coming up with anything given the current design. One idea is to change warning() to return a unique "token" and have inform() take it as an argument and do

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- For those that need a quick workaround for the kernel, I think (uint8x16_t) (k ^ vld1q_u8(const0)), (uint8x16_t) (k ^ vld1q_u8(const1)), instead of k ^ vld1q_u8(const0), k ^ vld1q_u8(const1), will do

  1   2   >