[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5baf71b0a5bd79923c095cf81218b8194008f60 commit r11-2489-ga5baf71b0a5bd79923c095cf81218b8194008f60 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sun

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #19) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5baf71b0a5bd79923c095cf81218b8194008f60 > > commit

[Bug fortran/96418] Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- And coarray_alloc_comp_3.f08 too. Best regards, José Rui

[Bug debug/96383] [8/9/10 Regression] Full ABI information missing from GCC compiled C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96383 Bug 96383 depends on bug 96404, which changed state. Bug 96404 Summary: [11 Regression] Bootstrap failure https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [11 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/96412] format suggestion issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96412 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/96419] New: Constant propoagation works on global variable, but not in a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96419 Bug ID: 96419 Summary: Constant propoagation works on global variable, but not in a function Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6e46b3f3da5c03bc529b3690dd0995927feb9142 commit r11-2491-g6e46b3f3da5c03bc529b3690dd0995927feb9142 Author: Sergei Trofimovich

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 --- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn --- The patch fixes bootstrap for AIX.

[Bug c/96420] New: -Wsign-extensions warnings are generated from system header macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96420 Bug ID: 96420 Summary: -Wsign-extensions warnings are generated from system header macros Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96102] ICE in check_host_association, at fortran/resolve.c:5994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96102 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 --- Comment #16 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551174.html for review. > I'll check if it fixes bootstrap for me. The patch fixed gcc bootstrap for me.

[Bug debug/96417] New: c++ `using` causes massive debug-info bloat (debug-info is kept for types/symbols)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96417 Bug ID: 96417 Summary: c++ `using` causes massive debug-info bloat (debug-info is kept for types/symbols) Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC generates separate |[8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC

[Bug fortran/96418] New: Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 Bug ID: 96418 Summary: Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/82375] PDT components in PDT declarations fail to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82375 José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrfsousa at gmail dot com

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 --- Comment #14 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #9) > valgrind says there is use of uninitialized variable: I picked _gcov.c and minimized it's unstable compilation under cvise. Then minimized it under

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e41da82345fb01c4c2641c979a94a975d15312ab commit r11-2487-ge41da82345fb01c4c2641c979a94a975d15312ab Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sun

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [10 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 --- Comment #15 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #14) > (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #9) > > valgrind says there is use of uninitialized variable: > > I picked _gcov.c and minimized it's

[Bug bootstrap/96422] New: [11 regression] Comparison failure in some 32-bit libgomp PIC objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96422 Bug ID: 96422 Summary: [11 regression] Comparison failure in some 32-bit libgomp PIC objects Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at charter dot net --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #16) > The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : > Paul, I see you got the format just right. I stumbled on that part and then decided to get

[Bug c/96420] -Wsign-extensions warnings are generated from system header macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96420 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/96421] missing __builtin_ia32_pand256 in X86 AVX2 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #18

[Bug bootstrap/96422] [11 regression] Comparison failure in some 32-bit libgomp PIC objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96422 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug bootstrap/96422] [11 regression] Comparison failure in some 32-bit libgomp PIC objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96422 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 48984 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48984=edit stage2 and stage3 oacc-parallel.o

[Bug tree-optimization/96424] New: ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 23); or ICE: Segmentation fault (in expand_omp_for_init_vars/contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96424 Bug ID: 96424 Summary: ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: wrong outgoing edge flags at end of bb 23); or ICE: Segmentation fault (in

[Bug c/96421] New: missing __builtin_ia32_pand256 in X86 AVX2 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96421 Bug ID: 96421 Summary: missing __builtin_ia32_pand256 in X86 AVX2 intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/96423] New: It is not checked whether module procedures have separate interface bodies.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96423 Bug ID: 96423 Summary: It is not checked whether module procedures have separate interface bodies. Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: