[Bug c++/64194] [C++14] for function template with auto return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64194 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/96416] address_of() is broken by static_assert in pointer_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ugh, yes, I think we do.

[Bug d/96435] New: d: Returning boolean in a union violates @safe code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435 Bug ID: 96435 Summary: d: Returning boolean in a union violates @safe code Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/96428] [nvptx] nvptx_gen_shuffle does not handle V2DI mode – Fails with an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96428 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Created attachment 48988 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48988=edit Test case (as diff – two files) I tried the testcase with and without you patch – and with it runs fine :-) Thanks

[Bug c++/96437] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:44246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96437 Bug ID: 96437 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at

[Bug c++/96440] New: ICE in tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in get_attribute_name, at attribs.c:841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96440 Bug ID: 96440 Summary: ICE in tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in get_attribute_name, at attribs.c:841 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/96434] New: [11 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-clone-2.c fails after r11-2482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96434 Bug ID: 96434 Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-clone-2.c fails after r11-2482 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/96366] [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96366 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/96433] Failed to optimize (A / N) * N <= A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96433 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/96375] [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Corallo --- "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > Just that I have no config where lob[16].c are supported because when running > arm-none-eabi tests I override -mcpu. When I don't override -mcpu, I don't > enable

[Bug fortran/96436] New: -std=f2003 -pedantic rejects valid f0.d edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96436 Bug ID: 96436 Summary: -std=f2003 -pedantic rejects valid f0.d edit descriptor Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/96430] internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96430 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/96436] -std=f2003 -pedantic rejects valid f0.d edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96436 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug target/96415] GCC produces incorrect code for loops with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and icelake-server

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96415 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/96411] erroneous "trait used in its own initializer" error when using concepts in a requirement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96411 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96410] A lambda with a template parameter list inside the template function using C++20 requires clauses is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96410 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/95696] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for vliw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95696 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug tree-optimization/96430] internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96430 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/96416] address_of() is broken by static_assert in pointer_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416 --- Comment #2 from Zach Laine --- Fair enough. [pointer.conversion] says that to_pointer(const Ptr& p) is "pointer_­traits​::​to_­address(p) if that expression is well-formed (see [pointer.traits.optmem]), otherwise

[Bug c++/96438] New: [10/11 Regression] ICE in do_pushtag, at cp/name-lookup.c:6861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96438 Bug ID: 96438 Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in do_pushtag, at cp/name-lookup.c:6861 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-recovery,

[Bug c++/96441] New: ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96441 Bug ID: 96441 Summary: ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96375] [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #3) > "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > It does fix the FAIL, thanks. > > Thanks for testing it! > > > I suspect you also want to add

[Bug tree-optimization/96433] Failed to optimize (A / N) * N <= A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96433 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/96430] internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96430 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c4763fa5b55f6e883ed7077b67c6175c2da63d1 commit r11-2512-g6c4763fa5b55f6e883ed7077b67c6175c2da63d1 Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug c++/96442] New: ICE in tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have record_type in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:8954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96442 Bug ID: 96442 Summary: ICE in tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have record_type in int_fits_type_p,

[Bug c++/96439] New: [concepts] nested requirement allows calling a method of a local parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96439 Bug ID: 96439 Summary: [concepts] nested requirement allows calling a method of a local parameter Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48987 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48987=edit gcc11-pr96354.patch So like this?

[Bug tree-optimization/95353] [10 Regression] spurious -Wstringop-overflow writing to a trailing array plus offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruce.fleming at gmail dot com ---

[Bug middle-end/96406] erroneous -Wstringop-overflow storing into a multidimensional char array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96406 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/95052] [9/10/11 Regression] Excess padding of partially initialized strings/char arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95052 Paulo Neves changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ptsneves at gmail dot com --- Comment #14

[Bug c++/96409] A lambda with a template parameter list inside the template function using C++20 nested requirements clauses occurs internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96409 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96375] [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- (In reply to akrl from comment #1) > Created attachment 48968 [details] > pr96375 lob tests patch > > Hi Christophe, > > The following patch does the job for me. Would you double check is > effective

[Bug d/96254] d: ICE using non-local variable: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96254 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b1c2a4bd9fb555dccde5d67d6da64547064e0e6 commit r11-2497-g2b1c2a4bd9fb555dccde5d67d6da64547064e0e6 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Tue

[Bug rtl-optimization/61494] -fsignaling-nans not taken into account for x - 0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61494 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:919c9d4bd3db7da09061af3b6f2a9193bf7bae45 commit r11-2502-g919c9d4bd3db7da09061af3b6f2a9193bf7bae45 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC |[8/9/10 Regression] GCC

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5

[Bug testsuite/96432] New test case gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 in r11-2487 fails to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96432 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/96428] New: [nvptx] nvptx_gen_shuffle does not handle V2DI mode – Fails with an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96428 Bug ID: 96428 Summary: [nvptx] nvptx_gen_shuffle does not handle V2DI mode – Fails with an ICE Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c/96427] Missing align attribute for anchor section from local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96427 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug d/96429] New: d: Pointer subtraction uses TRUNC_DIV_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96429 Bug ID: 96429 Summary: d: Pointer subtraction uses TRUNC_DIV_EXPR Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d

[Bug ipa/96431] New: [11 regression] ipa-clone-2.c fails since r13cdbb6a97c3d853cd380e5a03be8e0d35966c1e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96431 Bug ID: 96431 Summary: [11 regression] ipa-clone-2.c fails since r13cdbb6a97c3d853cd380e5a03be8e0d35966c1e Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/96427] New: Missing align attribute for anchor section from local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96427 Bug ID: 96427 Summary: Missing align attribute for anchor section from local variables Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/96410] A lambda with a template parameter list inside the template function using C++20 requires clauses is not usable in a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96410 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/96430] New: internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96430 Bug ID: 96430 Summary: internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:354 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/96416] address_of() is broken by static_assert in pointer_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think this is the "correct" behaviour. The specification of pointer_traits::element_type says that if Ptr::element_type isn't valid, and Ptr isn't a template that can be "rebound", then "otherwise, the

[Bug ipa/96431] [11 regression] ipa-clone-2.c fails since r13cdbb6a97c3d853cd380e5a03be8e0d35966c1e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96431 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Version|10.0

[Bug target/96428] [nvptx] nvptx_gen_shuffle does not handle V2DI mode – Fails with an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96428 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Tentative patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c index d8a8fb2d55b..cf53a921e5b 100644 --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c @@ -1796,6 +1796,44 @@

[Bug rtl-optimization/95696] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for vliw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95696 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1773f58f3a03e6c764373635fa079fa7526cfcf commit r11-2507-gd1773f58f3a03e6c764373635fa079fa7526cfcf Author: Yunde Zhong Date:

[Bug debug/96354] [10/11 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr, at gimple-fold.c:4903 since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96354 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21) > Created attachment 48987 [details] > gcc11-pr96354.patch > > So like this? yes.

[Bug c/96433] New: Failed to optimize (A / N) * N <= A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96433 Bug ID: 96433 Summary: Failed to optimize (A / N) * N <= A Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799 Dávid Bolvanský changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.bolvansky at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/96433] Failed to optimize (A / N) * N <= A

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96433 --- Comment #1 from Dávid Bolvanský --- Codegen: https://godbolt.org/z/7EvYj9 foo: movabs rdx, -6148914691236517205 mov rax, rdi mul rdx mov rax, rdx and rdx, -2 shr rax

[Bug target/96402] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -moutline-atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/96402] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -moutline-atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 48985 [details] > gcc11-pr96402.patch > > So, something like this then? Then the SIZE 16 compare and swap matches > what the

[Bug d/96429] d: Pointer subtraction uses TRUNC_DIV_EXPR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96429 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- --- a/gcc/d/expr.cc +++ b/gcc/d/expr.cc @@ -620,6 +620,18 @@ public: break; case TOKdiv: + /* Determine if the div expression is a lowered pointer diff operation. + The front-end

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 --- Comment #16 from Alan Modra --- It looks fine to me, assuming you don't need to keep any of these undefined symbols.

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b32c5d0b72fda2588b4e170e75a9c64e4bf266c7 commit r11-2506-gb32c5d0b72fda2588b4e170e75a9c64e4bf266c7 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/95766] Failure to directly use vpbroadcastd for _mm_set1_epi32 when passing unsigned short

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766 --- Comment #11 from Kirill Yukhin --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Kirill, any thoughts on that? I'd prefer your variant, w/o unspecs.

[Bug testsuite/96432] New: New test case gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 in r11-2487 fails to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96432 Bug ID: 96432 Summary: New test case gfortran.dg/pr96325.f90 in r11-2487 fails to produce executable Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799 --- Comment #6 from Dávid Bolvanský --- ^ Posted by mistake. Sorry.

[Bug target/96428] [nvptx] nvptx_gen_shuffle does not handle V2DI mode – Fails with an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96428 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0) > Created attachment 48986 [details] > Test case (Fortran, use 'gfortran -fopenacc" with nvptx offloading) > With the test-case setup like this: ... ! { dg-do

[Bug target/96375] [11 regression] arm/lob[2-5].c fail on some configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96375 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Corallo --- "clyon at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > Hi, Hi, > It does fix the FAIL, thanks. Thanks for testing it! > I suspect you also want to add -mthumb to > check_effective_target_arm_v8_1_lob_ok for consistency.

[Bug c++/96438] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in do_pushtag, at cp/name-lookup.c:6861

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96438 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Summary|[10/11

[Bug target/96415] GCC produces incorrect code for loops with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and icelake-server

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96415 Vsevolod Livinskiy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96364] ICE on valid code in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7537

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96364 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03

[Bug target/96446] ICE when spilling an MMA accumulator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96446 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-*

[Bug target/96446] New: ICE when spilling an MMA accumulator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96446 Bug ID: 96446 Summary: ICE when spilling an MMA accumulator Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug other/96447] New: False positive -Wstringop-overflow with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96447 Bug ID: 96447 Summary: False positive -Wstringop-overflow with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/96443] New: Incorrect satisfaction value for dependent return type placeholder constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96443 Bug ID: 96443 Summary: Incorrect satisfaction value for dependent return type placeholder constraint Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/96441] ICE in tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96441 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03 CC|

[Bug c++/96425] [8/9/10/11 regression] internal compiler error in maybe_process_partial_specialization()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96444] New: Incorrect satisfaction value of placeholder type constraint on variable with non-dependent initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96444 Bug ID: 96444 Summary: Incorrect satisfaction value of placeholder type constraint on variable with non-dependent initializer Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/96418] Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/96396] initializer_list in `-fconcepts -std=c++11` reports internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96396 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug other/96434] [11 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-clone-2.c fails after r11-2482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96434 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/96431] [11 regression] ipa-clone-2.c fails since r13cdbb6a97c3d853cd380e5a03be8e0d35966c1e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96431 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/96402] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -moutline-atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90b43856fdff7d96d93d22970eca8a86c56e0ddc commit r11-2520-g90b43856fdff7d96d93d22970eca8a86c56e0ddc Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug c++/96218] DR 2032: Default template-arguments of variable templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/94404] [meta-bug] C++ core issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404 Bug 94404 depends on bug 96218, which changed state. Bug 96218 Summary: DR 2032: Default template-arguments of variable templates https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/96447] False positive -Wstringop-overflow with -O3 due to loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96447 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug target/96402] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -moutline-atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd2ec4542fd2975e6d3f2f1c1a2639945a84f9e1 commit r10-8567-gfd2ec4542fd2975e6d3f2f1c1a2639945a84f9e1 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/96445] New: extern template results in missing constructor symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96445 Bug ID: 96445 Summary: extern template results in missing constructor symbol Product: gcc Version: 10.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/96418] Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/96442] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected integer_type or enumeral_type or boolean_type or real_type or fixed_point_type, have record_type in int_fits_type_p, at tree.c:8954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96442 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96440] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected tree_list, have error_mark in get_attribute_name, at attribs.c:841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96440 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96437] [10/11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl common’ structure, have ‘error_mark’ in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:44246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96437 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-08-03 CC|

[Bug c++/90199] ICE: tree check: expected complex_cst, have plus_expr in output_constant, at varasm.c:4994

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90199 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug target/96402] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -moutline-atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Should be fixed now for 10.3+ and 11+. If -moutline-atomics has been backported to older releases, it should go there too.

[Bug c++/96218] DR 2032: Default template-arguments of variable templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96218 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50bee766bc9f4020cf1f814178155d16e80dccaa commit r11-2521-g50bee766bc9f4020cf1f814178155d16e80dccaa Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/91365] Implement P1814R0: Class template argument deduction for alias templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91365 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/95696] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for vliw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95696 --- Comment #6 from zhongyunde at tom dot com --- Thanks for you notes and I thinks this issue can be closed now. It doesn't need to handle of non-SMS cases as they'll reschedule in general, which is good for performance under my test.

[Bug c/96427] Missing align attribute for anchor section from local variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96427 --- Comment #2 from zhongyunde at tom dot com --- should the data alignment honor the user specified ? Now, it seems compiler _do_ align the initializer according align load. so even if the local array doesn't specify the

[Bug c++/88323] implement C++20 language features.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323 Bug 88323 depends on bug 91365, which changed state. Bug 91365 Summary: Implement P1814R0: Class template argument deduction for alias templates https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91365 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #21 from Damian Rouson --- Now that the patch fixing this PR has been committed to the trunk, should it be marked as "Resolved" instead of "Assigned?"

[Bug c++/96082] [9/10/11 Regression] GCC rejects the template disambiguator with "typename"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96082 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/96448] New: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96448 Bug ID: 96448 Summary: ICE: maximum number of generated reload insns per insn achieved (90) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/96320] gfortran 8-10 shape mismatch in assumed-length dummy argument character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 --- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 11:45:20PM +, damian at sourceryinstitute dot org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320 > > --- Comment #21 from Damian Rouson --- > Now that the patch

[Bug c++/94765] Floating point type template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94765 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/96366] [AArch64] ICE due to lack of support for VNx2SI sub instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96366 --- Comment #5 from Bu Le --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3) > (In reply to Bu Le from comment #2) > > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #1) > > > (In reply to Bu Le from comment #0) > Generating a subtraction

  1   2   >