https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
> Created attachment 49222 [details]
> Slightly reduced example, compile with gfortran -fopenmp -O1 -ftracer
On the host side, a single BB gets inserted – but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
Bug ID: 97066
Summary: GCC11 regression caused by r11-3207
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC11 regression caused by |[11 Regression] regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97053
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd909071ac04e94f4b6f0baab64d0687ec55681d
commit r11-3219-gbd909071ac04e94f4b6f0baab64d0687ec55681d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
--- Comment #1 from Feng Xue ---
Both cases will be simplified with new pattern, and this is correct. Will
change test code to make that not happen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
fxue at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96987
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
And what about void pointers? How is it assumed that the pointed to object is
read when it has no value?
Expanded example loosely rewritten from the original library code.
---
void GC_addRange(const void *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97053
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e97e7470e74b0d9a68000938a359a7049774d77
commit r10-8769-g7e97e7470e74b0d9a68000938a359a7049774d77
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95677
--- Comment #9 from liusujian ---
After lto and as:
/home/lsj/dts/SDK_CPU_RISCV/output/hcc_riscv32/hcc_riscv32/bin/../lib/gcc/riscv32-unknown-elf/7.3.0/../../../../riscv32-unknown-elf/bin/as
-v --traditional-format -march=rv32imc -march=rv32imc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #2 from Jiri Olsa ---
Created attachment 49223
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49223=edit
fs/init.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97057
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97058
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
You're not supposed to use this flag but the behavior is indeed weird. The
last part "not valid for C/C++" is due to the fact the option is not marked
for any language:
funroll-completely-grow-size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97064
Bug ID: 97064
Summary: BB vectorization behaves sub-optimal
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97065
Bug ID: 97065
Summary: Support -fprofile-update=set (boolean counters)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97061
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97061
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
I think I also got this ICE with an additional 'collapse(2)', which might
indicate that a(nother) check is missing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97064
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97067
Bug ID: 97067
Summary: UBSAN: False positive maybe-uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So perhaps completely untested:
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c.jj 2020-09-07 13:17:58.383594248 +0200
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c 2020-09-16 10:53:44.353632197 +0200
@@ -26547,7 +26547,8 @@ dwarf2out_early_global_decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #4 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> So this is really just something like: -O2 -g -dA:
> extern int foo (unsigned int, unsigned int);
>
> int
> bar (void)
> {
> foo (1, 2);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.2.1 |11.0
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #12 from Kewen Lin ---
> Thanks for the explanation! I'll look at it after checking 2). IIUC, the
> advantage to eliminate stores here looks able to get those things which is
> fed to stores and stores' consumers bundled, then get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85351
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> Two questions in mind, need to dig into it further:
> 1) from the assembly of scalar/vector code, I don't see any stores needed
> into temp array d (array diff in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfortunately the patch doesn't really bootstrap.
Small testcase that ICEs:
struct S { virtual ~S (); } s;
This is on the external S::~S() declaration, which has non-NULL
decl_ultimate_origin (the abstract
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:453a20c65722719b9e2d84339f215e7ec87692dc
commit r11-3229-g453a20c65722719b9e2d84339f215e7ec87692dc
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Sep 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
--- Comment #2 from Martin Ogden ---
I appreciate `#line 0 "main.c"` doesn't make much sense, but according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Line-Control.html, 0 is a valid input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Bug ID: 97071
Summary: Fails to CSE / inherit constant pool load
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97066
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Feng Xue :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f419a0158950034ed9996ae860b0c8df03731119
commit r11-3228-gf419a0158950034ed9996ae860b0c8df03731119
Author: Feng Xue
Date: Wed Sep 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
Bug ID: 97069
Summary: Zero valued #line directive results in excessively
large blocks of memory being allocated
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> REG_EQUAL notes aren't really needed for that, we have functions to query
> the values from the constant pool for loads from it.
> So guess it is a matter of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So on targets where the FP constant loads are separate insns the load of the
negated constant could be replaced by a (neg:DF ..) which might even be
profitable when not combined with the following add. As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries ---
Minimal example after commit 91347c3bbf7 "Fortran: OpenMP - fix simd with
(last)private (PR97061)":
...
! { dg-do run }
program main
implicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> > > Two questions in mind, need to dig into it further:
> > > 1) from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97061
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96987
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
A void pointer is usually cast to one to a complete type that's then used to
access the object (e.g., bsearch). But not every instance of every warning
should be expected to indicate a bug. Most only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 49228
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49228=edit
Dumps for failing test-case (no collapse case)
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #7)
> Minimal example after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97068
Bug ID: 97068
Summary: Can't demangle a certain symbl
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7)
> > Two questions in mind, need to dig into it further:
> > 1) from the assembly of scalar/vector code, I don't see any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97070
Bug ID: 97070
Summary: Discrepancy in results between OpenMP/OpenACC
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Related and more difficult case where the add is first and we'd want to
change the load of -3 to a load of 3 so we can CSE the 3 for the
multiplication.
double foo (double x)
{
return (x + -3.) * 3.;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95654
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 49227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49227=edit
Dumps for failing test-case
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> Minimal example:
> ...
> ! { dg-do run }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97033
Kaiyan Chang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||changkaiyan at live dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97061
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91347c3bbf788ede4af89f46206991c47fa8aceb
commit r11-3232-g91347c3bbf788ede4af89f46206991c47fa8aceb
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96571
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2472e513c6490b6e2832b07d08731df26e6dc06
commit r9-8909-gd2472e513c6490b6e2832b07d08731df26e6dc06
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdc1ed0ceaf7e520164c262358ea6bfe89ff027c
commit r9-8907-gcdc1ed0ceaf7e520164c262358ea6bfe89ff027c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96729
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ace10c37de7c2f9f2d419337dc1f173c01f7ec7d
commit r9-8911-gace10c37de7c2f9f2d419337dc1f173c01f7ec7d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96174
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fdcb6dae610aba75e23c1fd2d31b491691e54091
commit r9-8904-gfdcb6dae610aba75e23c1fd2d31b491691e54091
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96459
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:464ed899038051f80af1df7197e561f327502107
commit r9-8906-g464ed899038051f80af1df7197e561f327502107
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:acd97038dba34830520ed58915d509d21348b554
commit r9-8910-gacd97038dba34830520ed58915d509d21348b554
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96862
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25542b27aa6a75ad0f7316c3767c957cce912fb7
commit r9-8912-g25542b27aa6a75ad0f7316c3767c957cce912fb7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94820
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:029d813ddf3595bfc93bfb4afad645dd033d21bf
commit r9-8889-g029d813ddf3595bfc93bfb4afad645dd033d21bf
Author: Haijian Zhang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94951
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eca1dbea010ba4c18ccec90bacbad5d8ec72c09f
commit r9-8897-geca1dbea010ba4c18ccec90bacbad5d8ec72c09f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95328
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8efa945b308307fd9b0313705f5826a8499de405
commit r9-8900-g8efa945b308307fd9b0313705f5826a8499de405
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94842
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b66139a3ba159473432edabb983c62219a28590d
commit r9-8894-gb66139a3ba159473432edabb983c62219a28590d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95903
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1eb6e41832816b671d3b945014f7e8255167470
commit r9-8902-ga1eb6e41832816b671d3b945014f7e8255167470
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95810
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ff6c02695c9b6ae6e840422080f6d10449577b8
commit r9-8901-g6ff6c02695c9b6ae6e840422080f6d10449577b8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96426
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f804f63cde54ff94f35abd00953b050a4c861c7
commit r9-8905-g3f804f63cde54ff94f35abd00953b050a4c861c7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94832
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccee0511abf6e0bb679fa6b4941e5a71a6521b12
commit r9-8892-gccee0511abf6e0bb679fa6b4941e5a71a6521b12
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94832
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f97bf9657cecaaf8afd14b43e5ca9be294ab870c
commit r9-8891-gf97bf9657cecaaf8afd14b43e5ca9be294ab870c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96545
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67627293b4fe2b230c6c32484752adb49f713315
commit r9-8908-g67627293b4fe2b230c6c32484752adb49f713315
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86346
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.1.0
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96126
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96139
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74c624523bdbe4329c7cb77bff222ac695e36c95
commit r8-10453-g74c624523bdbe4329c7cb77bff222ac695e36c95
Author: Will Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97073
Bug ID: 97073
Summary: Miscompilation with -m32 -O1 -march=i686
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96958
Ryan Houdek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||houdek.r...@fex-emu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97074
Bug ID: 97074
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when merging
states
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97076
Bug ID: 97076
Summary: clang-format file does not work for some C++11 code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97034
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
// PR c++/97034
namespace N {
template struct S {
template S(T, U);
};
} // namespace N
template struct E {
template struct G { T t; };
void fn() { G{N::S{'a', 1}}; }
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97072
Bug ID: 97072
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when writing
through some pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97071
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94524
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:780b2ab071391495690141c61604370d6cf7af49
commit r9-8877-g780b2ab071391495690141c61604370d6cf7af49
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94618
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea597314f4503228e23e887ddbb773cbf197093
commit r9-8881-gdea597314f4503228e23e887ddbb773cbf197093
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94641
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e4a928134e8f17bbcae99f2bac2bbce73ef6f73
commit r9-8882-g1e4a928134e8f17bbcae99f2bac2bbce73ef6f73
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94755
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6a341eb9170fdb21aee235142d1f09e6dc5c5cd
commit r9-8886-gd6a341eb9170fdb21aee235142d1f09e6dc5c5cd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94705
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:934ede34973909eb15b678f88395d83be01433e7
commit r9-8883-g934ede34973909eb15b678f88395d83be01433e7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94780
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1777beb6b12983b946dae4177470a319693fc0dc
commit r9-8887-g1777beb6b12983b946dae4177470a319693fc0dc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94809
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:522022361984407ebc84cde22bdbd199261d0443
commit r9--g522022361984407ebc84cde22bdbd199261d0443
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94826
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:540e1de23a70360fe9b626df8420be704d02e3a7
commit r9-8890-g540e1de23a70360fe9b626df8420be704d02e3a7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95108
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b78ea59edbd354fed914d0f8eb78109db7316ce8
commit r9-8899-gb78ea59edbd354fed914d0f8eb78109db7316ce8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94950
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79002374e81588fa1052c21f3d397cf9ad61f97d
commit r9-8896-g79002374e81588fa1052c21f3d397cf9ad61f97d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94873
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f717ba5975ab42e1176db4cd2384f1862872519
commit r9-8895-g0f717ba5975ab42e1176db4cd2384f1862872519
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95080
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d01f91514f627590adc408ac9a35a7153123119
commit r9-8898-g9d01f91514f627590adc408ac9a35a7153123119
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94621
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b23b0c44692cc5e4d5e726f96497bff73094e7b
commit r9-8880-g5b23b0c44692cc5e4d5e726f96497bff73094e7b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94742
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9dbd80b5e62a126ccb40970f0fb233f7e0ac3a6
commit r9-8885-ge9dbd80b5e62a126ccb40970f0fb233f7e0ac3a6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94571
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a43981bb51fd0b8e68452faea6ec160cbea058e5
commit r9-8879-ga43981bb51fd0b8e68452faea6ec160cbea058e5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94710
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15e2cca37186c848d12f4a0bb9ebcb8be32ed9de
commit r9-8884-g15e2cca37186c848d12f4a0bb9ebcb8be32ed9de
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86403
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78666
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71ad0b5dde449ee1f6b755a99f5c52152e375835
commit r11-3239-g71ad0b5dde449ee1f6b755a99f5c52152e375835
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
