https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The difference is
PatternDriver::TemplateEnum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79224
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83206
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93745
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92902
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88054
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8938332efa5ca5926b6f349e13b251e52bc2383
commit r9-9535-gc8938332efa5ca5926b6f349e13b251e52bc2383
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100622
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634
Bug ID: 100634
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in convert_nontype_argument, at
cp/pt.c:7653
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100628
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593
--- Comment #4 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> I understand what you're saying, but it seems we're talking past each other.
>
> I agree that if a library is linked with any -Bsymbolic* flag, the main
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100623
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-17
Summary|[10/11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95958
Bug 95958 depends on bug 89057, which changed state.
Bug 89057 Summary: [9 Regression] AArch64 ld3 st4 less optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89967
Bug 89967 depends on bug 89057, which changed state.
Bug 89057 Summary: [9 Regression] AArch64 ld3 st4 less optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100635
Bug ID: 100635
Summary: error: cannot bind non-const lvalue reference of type
'const volatile int&' to ...
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100622
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100633
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100601
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> Please avoid creating trivial duplicates.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 100453 ***
Okay Eric; I had overlooked this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100600
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov ---
I understand what you're saying, but it seems we're talking past each other.
I agree that if a library is linked with any -Bsymbolic* flag, the main
executable is at risk of broken address uniqueness
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ddc622a15d05510e7ab17ca1584d7fdb828d64e
commit r10-9828-g9ddc622a15d05510e7ab17ca1584d7fdb828d64e
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82967
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-17
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82962
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100634
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100633
Bug ID: 100633
Summary: ICE: gfc_trans_omp_workshare(): Bad statement code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The difference is
> PatternDriver::TemplateEnum vs
> PatternDriver::TemplateEnum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The difference is
> PatternDriver::TemplateEnum vs
> PatternDriver::TemplateEnum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
Pilar Latiesa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pilarlatiesa at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100605
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Version|tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100625
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:086882b1c8faa8f99f98a9219ccec42d89db50c2
commit r12-839-g086882b1c8faa8f99f98a9219ccec42d89db50c2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
James McKelvey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mckelvey at maskull dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47d3815f0669800666f1dd69f0c5cfecc617a12b
commit r10-9832-g47d3815f0669800666f1dd69f0c5cfecc617a12b
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96932
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries ---
*** Bug 96932 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593
--- Comment #6 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #5)
> Hm, I still don't think I'm misunderstanding what you're saying. I'm
> familiar with the ELF standard (and FWIW I have read your blog posts on
> related
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100580
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100640
Bug ID: 100640
Summary: GCC permits explicit instantiation of a constructor
template with an explicit template argument list
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58f7c7e098b79c96403c8341823ec3ba1e8b3945
commit r12-846-g58f7c7e098b79c96403c8341823ec3ba1e8b3945
Author: Tom de Vries
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #15 from James McKelvey ---
The Break's are actually functions that call the constructor. They look like
this:
inline BreakPattern
Break(const AbstractStringScalarValue& value,
const ComplementEnum&a_complement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #17 from James McKelvey ---
Sorry, that constructor is in the .cc file. Looks like the .cc contents weren't
picked up by the attempt to get the preprocessed source.
BreakPattern::
BreakPattern(const pdstring&
-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210517 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #16 from James McKelvey ---
The Break's are actually functions that call the constructor. They look like
this:
inline BreakPattern
Break(const AbstractStringScalarValue& value,
const ComplementEnum&a_complement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #11 from James McKelvey ---
I don't see _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI anywhere in the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89728
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd89fc77639a63a141dbbc6292dd73e653794d61
commit r12-844-gfd89fc77639a63a141dbbc6292dd73e653794d61
Author: Antony Polukhin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45aa7a447652e8541cc381d7ab128544f81ed857
commit r12-845-g45aa7a447652e8541cc381d7ab128544f81ed857
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89120
--- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin ---
Long story short: I've found no way to improve the standard library code to
always work faster. I'm in favor of closing this ticket as invalid/wont fix.
Long story:
I've tried to add a specialization of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to James McKelvey from comment #10)
> Created attachment 50824 [details]
> Preprocessed source for main
This is header_edit.cc right?
I don't see any definition of the missing constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100635
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100631
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
*di3_doubleword calls split_double_mode with:
op0: (subreg:DI (reg/v:SI 89 [ li_18 ]) 0)
op1: (reg:DI 90 [ uc_4 ])
op2: (mem/c:DI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 19 frame)
(const_int -4 [0xfffc]))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100549
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45063c0506a00f2673049d46f12a6061dca4692f
commit r12-833-g45063c0506a00f2673049d46f12a6061dca4692f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100369
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
The trace you share contains arm-linux-gnueabihf, so it seems the target is
actually arm, instead of aarch64?
Anyway, I can see no such error in the automatic validations, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #9 from James McKelvey ---
Created attachment 50823
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50823=edit
Preprocessed source for BreakPattern.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629
--- Comment #10 from James McKelvey ---
Created attachment 50824
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50824=edit
Preprocessed source for main
-languages=c,c++
--disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210517 (experimental) [master revision
e49ff61d419:73ee0e029f5:1dfb5d8ab52c3c76c877077d8d6dc4eaae3c6153] (GCC)
[548] %
[548] % gcctk -O1 -c small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.1.0, 9.3.1
Known to work|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100595
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100600
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Version|tree-ssa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100623
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100622
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
why is masking not needed? it looks like it is present in both cases, once
before the return and once after the add (that could be sunk).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100630
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cd69a5a0dd31bc6fdef1bbabc8d6d1416014ea1
commit r10-9831-g4cd69a5a0dd31bc6fdef1bbabc8d6d1416014ea1
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497
--- Comment #13 from Tom de Vries ---
Posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-May/570508.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99977
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c28df7197b4886fde6b4f7f47f2102f886339655
commit r11-8423-gc28df7197b4886fde6b4f7f47f2102f886339655
Author: Alex Coplan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100369
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #1)
> Can you share details on how you get this error? (GCC configure options,
> command-line used to compile the testcase)
configure is
CC="clang -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100639
Bug ID: 100639
Summary: reverse_view::reference erroneously uses
iterator_traits::reference instead of
iter_reference_t
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo