https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
W E Brown changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95948
--- Comment #3 from Vasily Khramushin ---
Thank you, I agree. Just created my own algorithm to solve a particular
problem. The standard function is correct of course.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 51174
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51174=edit
Experimental Fix
With that patch the number of combine attempts goes back to normal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92718
Konstantin Kharlamov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101524
Bug ID: 101524
Summary: Improve diagnostic for incorrect definition of
namespace alias
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95102
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> One thing that should be done:
> if (_1 < a_4(D))
> goto ; [50.00%]
> else
> goto ; [50.00%]
>
>[local count: 536870913]:
> x_5 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100878
--- Comment #1 from Ed Catmur ---
Per godbolt, this appears to be fixed on trunk: https://godbolt.org/z/xxz8ecxzK
g++
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-48e8a7a677b8356df946cd12fbb215538828e747-binutils-2.36.1)
12.0.0 20210707 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85636
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60001
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63202
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92538
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92718
--- Comment #9 from Konstantin Kharlamov ---
Omg, I am sorry, please ignore my comment. For some incomprehensible reason
bugzilla circles through bug entries upon sending a comment. My comment here
was supposed for another report, but then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cc2df084b7977653a9b59cbc34a9ad500ae619c
commit r12-2412-g7cc2df084b7977653a9b59cbc34a9ad500ae619c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101473
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
I'm interested if remaining differences are due to the same underlying issue or
not, so I'm for now leaving this PR open (it's too late to backport for 11.2
but could be backported for 11.3 though it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437
Konstantin Kharlamov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72443
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-07-26 00:00:00 |2021-7-20
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57650
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
Bug ID: 101523
Summary: Huge number of combine attempts
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel ---
This appears to be triggered by try_combine unnecessarily setting back the
position by returning the i2 insn.
When 866 is inserted into 973 866 still needs to be kept around for other
users. So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101519
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See also PR 101526 which requests another improvement to the same diagnostic,
but with a different cause.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5aa28c8cf15cd254cc5a3a12278133b93b8b017f
commit r10-9993-g5aa28c8cf15cd254cc5a3a12278133b93b8b017f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101526
Bug ID: 101526
Summary: Improve diagnostic for trailing comma in base-clause
in class-head
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101526
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101527
Bug ID: 101527
Summary: The implementation of std::common_iterator::operator==
seems to be wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Madhu from comment #0)
> cppreference.com states
>
> ```
> bool create_directory( const std::filesystem::path& p );
>
> Creates the directory p as if by POSIX mkdir() with a second
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c4ae4ff46b1d7633f1e06f57d348b5817b8f640
commit r12-2413-g0c4ae4ff46b1d7633f1e06f57d348b5817b8f640
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I've added tests to verify that the behaviour is correct, and those tests pass
with all versions of GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51175
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51175=edit
gcc12-pr101516.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101525
Bug ID: 101525
Summary: "out of the bounds" warning for an Innocuous memset
call with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #18 from Tomasz Konojacki ---
Sorry, it still warns in C mode, but it doesn't in C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tomasz Konojacki from comment #18)
> Sorry, it still warns in C mode, but it doesn't in C++.
Yes it does, but only the second one of:
char x = ((void) i, 0);
x = i ? x : ((void) i, 0);
The
202-g1ef9b135793-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-aarch64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210720 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101530
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100167
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fcb33455c9dc9359d98cd6bffe7f32f282ed713
commit r12-2417-g7fcb33455c9dc9359d98cd6bffe7f32f282ed713
Author: Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #11 from Madhu ---
sorry for the typos in my last message - i should've proofread - but
they should be fairly obvious. ( I wrote "p" instead of p, and fff
instead of xxx, etc.)
I think my initial problem remains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101536
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc386b020869ad0095cf58f8c76a40ea457e7a2c
commit r11-8789-gdc386b020869ad0095cf58f8c76a40ea457e7a2c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0e82856d535f56c916382f892ed2435dde54d4d
commit r12-2416-ge0e82856d535f56c916382f892ed2435dde54d4d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101506
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ef9b135793a528c05c4a3e22649744955aa2dfb
commit r12-2414-g1ef9b135793a528c05c4a3e22649744955aa2dfb
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101530
Bug ID: 101530
Summary: ICE: 'verify_gimple' failed: non-top-level
'bit_field_ref' with __builtin_shufflevector()[0]
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #7 from Madhu ---
* "redi at gcc dot gnu.org"
Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:00:55 +
>> I was going by the usage from databasePath() in
>> https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/main/Source/WebKit/NetworkProcess/
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 93437, which changed state.
Bug 93437 Summary: [9 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on protobuf generated
code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93437
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101533
Bug ID: 101533
Summary: ICE in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:25988
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Madhu from comment #11)
> I think my initial problem remains
Well your "initial problem" was talking exclusively about create_directory,
which works perfectly.
There is a problem is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101535
Bug ID: 101535
Summary: ICE in lookup_decl, at omp-low.c:412
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #260 from Larkin Nickle ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #259)
> The compiler being used to compile mkstemps.c is broken. If core dumps are
> enabled,
> you should be able to use gdb (wdb) directly to find the illegal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For C++ the comment 15 case seems to have been fixed by r10-6527:
c++: Use constexpr to avoid wrong -Wsign-compare (PR90691).
We would like to do constexpr evaluation to avoid false positives on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101384
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|11.1.1 |11.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101506
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #256 from Larkin Nickle ---
Created attachment 51179
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51179=edit
Configure log for gcc 11.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531
Bug ID: 101531
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has
excess errors after r11-8780
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101534
Bug ID: 101534
Summary: ICE in create_tailcall_accumulator, at
tree-tailcall.c:1083
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #259 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-07-19 5:00 p.m., me at larbob dot org wrote:
> I've now tried 11.1.0 almost exactly as The Written Word builds it, and still
> get:
>
> during GIMPLE pass: dce
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537
Bug ID: 101537
Summary: -Wconversion false positive in ternary
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528
Bug ID: 101528
Summary: [11 regression]
gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after
r11-8743
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100863
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89ec3b67dbe856a447d068b053bc19559f136f43
commit r12-2415-g89ec3b67dbe856a447d068b053bc19559f136f43
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #5 from Madhu ---
* "redi at gcc dot gnu.org"
Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 11:46:32 +
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
>
> --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> (In reply to Madhu from comment #0)
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think you are still confused between the bool that crate_directory returns,
and the bool that you get from !ec
The bool that is returned tells you if a new directory was created.
The bool you get from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101535
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #14 from Madhu ---
* "redi at gcc dot gnu.org"
Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:59:20 +
> Well your "initial problem" was talking exclusively about
> create_directory, which works perfectly.
>
> There is a problem is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed by r10-7344:
c++: Handle COMPOUND_EXPRs in get_narrower and
warnings_for_convert_and_check [PR91993]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #257 from Larkin Nickle ---
Created attachment 51180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51180=edit
Build log for GCC 11.1 with -j1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #258 from Larkin Nickle ---
I've now attached the configure log as well as the build log for GCC 11.1 with
`-j1` passed to make so as to make the log more readable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #9 from Madhu ---
* "redi at gcc dot gnu.org"
Wrote on Tue, 20 Jul 2021 16:25:44 +
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> I think you are still confused between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101532
Bug ID: 101532
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in finish_expr_stmt, at
cp/semantics.c:859
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99400
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #1 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101536
Bug ID: 101536
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at
fortran/trans-array.c:7324
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295
--- Comment #8 from Richard Smith ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Richard S., is there any reason to use the built-ins for the constant
> evaluation case?
No, Clang's constant evaluator treats the built-ins and calls to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101300
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e07d30fdcaec4906e0dcb948fc4748bf74c15c05
commit r12-2420-ge07d30fdcaec4906e0dcb948fc4748bf74c15c05
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101510
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:124eaa50e0a34f5f89572c1aa812c50979da58fc
commit r12-2421-g124eaa50e0a34f5f89572c1aa812c50979da58fc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101514
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo