[Bug target/101662] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91446.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101662 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |[12 Regression] FAIL:

[Bug middle-end/101665] -fno-delete-null-pointer checks ineffective for attribute nonnull parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101665 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- It was originally just guarding whether there can be an object at address zero. The later adjustment to also cover NULL pointer checks is incomplete at the implementation side. It's also not clear if it

[Bug target/101662] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91446.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101662 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Should be "fixed" by r12-2587

[Bug tree-optimization/101668] BB vectorizer doesn't handle lowpart of existing vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Last

[Bug middle-end/101673] New: shorter unprofitable jump thread path inhibits threading of larger path

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101673 Bug ID: 101673 Summary: shorter unprofitable jump thread path inhibits threading of larger path Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c++/101670] New: Internal compiler error with concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101670 Bug ID: 101670 Summary: Internal compiler error with concepts Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/101641] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- With union punning we've basically opened up a way to change the dynamic type of storage in a way that expects us from generating no code from a "virtual" read-write cycle involving the previous and the

[Bug tree-optimization/101667] GNAT bug detected in op1_range in range-op.cc during GIMPLE pass evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101667 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- Works on 11.2.1 as well: tor:~/tmp/tree-vrp-test$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc

[Bug c++/84583] -fdirectives-only does not handle CRLF properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84583 Boris Kolpackov changed: What|Removed |Added Component|preprocessor|c++ Version|7.2.0

[Bug libstdc++/101659] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode for std::optional ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101659 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- I already see some "__glibcxx_assert(this->_M_is_engaged());" in the code, which IIUC should be enabled by _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS (and a fortiori by _GLIBCXX_DEBUG). Did you actually try it?

[Bug objc/101616] Objective-C frontend should not emit vtable/fixup messages (at least, not by default)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101616 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Matt Jacobson from comment #3) > As it happens, I'm targeting the NeXT v2 runtime, but I'm *not* actually > targeting Darwin. So `flag_next_runtime` is just 1 for me--not an OS > version value

[Bug d/101672] New: d: Allow use of classes without the runtime if they only contain static members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672 Bug ID: 101672 Summary: d: Allow use of classes without the runtime if they only contain static members Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/81596] backwards threader misses simple copy within the same BB

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81596 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/101659] _GLIBCXX_DEBUG mode for std::optional ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |12.0 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/101660] [12 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_3.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/101669] New: error reading variable from debug information when compiling with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669 Bug ID: 101669 Summary: error reading variable from debug information when compiling with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug tree-optimization/101667] GNAT bug detected in op1_range in range-op.cc during GIMPLE pass evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101667 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ada |tree-optimization CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/101641] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- And the DOM copy has been split out to refs_same_for_tbaa_p, now also used by RTL CSE and DSE (which do the same transform), see the fix for PR93946.

[Bug tree-optimization/101641] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Just some more brain-dumps from thinking about a fix. - we can annotate the alias_set_entry with a flag whether it was created for a union type and use that to improve the logic - we can introduce some

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou --- > The user I'm most worried about is stor-layout.c:place_field which > uses multiple_of_p to optimize DECL_OFFSET_ALIGN, where losing that > might have severe impact on Ada. Indeed, this might measurably

[Bug debug/101669] error reading variable from debug information when compiling with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669 --- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Similar to what Richard said, tested with gdb, use -gdwarf-4 with trunk, the msg also disappears.

[Bug target/101609] no right shift pattern for vector(2) long long on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101609 --- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod --- > .. but still doesn't generate 'vector code' for the example shown here. Actually, it does. I was looking in the wrong place.

[Bug tree-optimization/101667] GNAT bug detected in op1_range in range-op.cc during GIMPLE pass evrp

compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20210729 (experimental) (GCC) $ make gnatmake -gnatVa -gnata -O1 -ftree-vrp src/egl-objects-displays.adb gcc -c -Isrc/ -gnatVa -gnata -O1 -ftree-vrp -I- src/egl-objects-displays.adb gcc -c -Isrc/ -gnatVa -gnata -O1 -ftree-vrp -I- src/egl.adb gcc

[Bug fortran/101660] [12 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_3.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/101669] error reading variable from debug information when compiling with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/101512] [11/12 Regression] ICE in maybe_trim_constructor_store, at tree-ssa-dse.c:379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e63d76234d18cac731c4f3610d513bd8b39b5520 commit r12-2590-ge63d76234d18cac731c4f3610d513bd8b39b5520 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug testsuite/101654] [12 regression] new test case UNRESOLVED problem in r12-2524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/101661] UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/remref-6.c scan-ipa-dump inline "Removed a reference"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101661 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug target/100952] [12 regression] several test case failures after r12-1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100952 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by HaoChen Gui : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210 commit r12-2592-gf0529d96f56758e56151f409c55bab3034163210 Author: Haochen Gui Date: Thu

[Bug middle-end/101674] New: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c fails after jump threading rewrite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101674 Bug ID: 101674 Summary: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c fails after jump threading rewrite Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/101675] New: analyzer/pr94851-2.c marked XFAIL because it fails with new jump threader

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101675 Bug ID: 101675 Summary: analyzer/pr94851-2.c marked XFAIL because it fails with new jump threader Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/101512] [11 Regression] ICE in maybe_trim_constructor_store, at tree-ssa-dse.c:379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/101668] BB vectorizer doesn't handle lowpart of existing vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101668 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- > it looks like there's no V8SI->V8DI conversion optab or we choose V4DI > for some other reason as prefered vector mode. We have, just need to add -mprefer-vector-width=512, the we'll get bar_s32_s64:

[Bug fortran/101660] [12 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_3.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101660 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/101669] error reading variable from debug information when compiling with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- This is weird. There is no .debug_loc section with DWARF 5 at all, only .debug_loclists. I don't see any complains from readelf: readelf --debug-dump=loc pr101669 >/dev/null (binutils 2.36.1). And no

[Bug middle-end/101671] New: pr83510 fails because threader confuses -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671 Bug ID: 101671 Summary: pr83510 fails because threader confuses -Warray-bounds Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/101627] List-directed read with trailing characters after quotes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101627 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug objc/67694] ICE on returning undefined enum in must_pass_in_stack_var_size_or_pad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67694 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-08-09 00:00:00 |2021-7-29 See Also|

[Bug fortran/100651] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Weird memory corruption with multiple triggers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Weird memory corruption |[9/10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11/12 Regression] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11] Pointless: Array|[10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug testsuite/97826] internal compiler error: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:6453

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97826 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/97825] internal compiler error: in build_ptrmemfunc, at cp/typeck.c:9199

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97825 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target|

[Bug target/65568] ptrmem8.C:9:9: internal compiler error: in build_ptrmemfunc, at cp/typeck.c:7940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug target/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 Matt Thompson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov ---

[Bug d/101672] d: Allow use of classes without the runtime if they only contain static members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3c13cf479ba81c4d29b202e9b8c6a7f0031a8b20 commit r12-2599-g3c13cf479ba81c4d29b202e9b8c6a7f0031a8b20 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug d/101664] d: Return the correct value for C++ constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7616ed6307c90b5bbf1bf53550d33cc674ab4b6f commit r12-2598-g7616ed6307c90b5bbf1bf53550d33cc674ab4b6f Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug d/96435] d: Returning boolean in a union violates @safe code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c848c0ec7fab0c0a220683ad234c8842939941cf commit r9-9653-gc848c0ec7fab0c0a220683ad234c8842939941cf Author: Iain Buclaw Date:

[Bug d/101657] d: di header file created even if errors occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/101672] d: Allow use of classes without the runtime if they only contain static members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101672 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100651] Weird memory corruption with multiple triggers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug d/101664] d: Return the correct value for C++ constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0) > > C++ constructors return void, even though the front-end semantic treats them > > as implicitly returning `this'. >

[Bug tree-optimization/71538] Missing removal of null pointer check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71538 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/101171] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_expr_sizeof_expr, at c/c-typeck.c:3006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101171 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at debian dot org --- Comment #9

[Bug c/97892] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_expr_sizeof_expr, at c/c-typeck.c:2946

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/101679] New: duplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101679 Bug ID: 101679 Summary: duplicate warning offset outside bounds of constant string Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101641] Bogus redundant store removal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101641 --- Comment #5 from Martin Uecker --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > What we know from the union read is that the dynamic type is either the > union type (so the read can pun) or the dynamic type is the union member > type

[Bug testsuite/37628] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr35456.c is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37628 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29 Severity|normal

[Bug testsuite/45068] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/nested-2.C failed on Linux/ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45068 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/65568] ptrmem8.C:9:9: internal compiler error: in build_ptrmemfunc, at cp/typeck.c:7940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.kokovic at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/101101] ICE in gfc_build_array_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:1391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101101 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-29 Ever

[Bug testsuite/101678] New: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Bug ID: 101678 Summary: [12 regression] many fortran errors afterr r12-2553 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/37187] please provide a way to treat -pedantic as warning when using -Werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37187 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/100651] Weird memory corruption with multiple triggers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 --- Comment #5 from Matt Thompson --- Iain, The Linux system would be SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3. The macOS system is macOS 11.5.1. On the Linux machine, I can confirm the error with (I only have some versions of GCC available): *

[Bug c/24293] Undefined behaviour not diagnosed with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/14319] incorrect optimization of union of structs with common initial sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/43495] gcc.c-torture/execute/20000603-1.c fails with -fpic/-fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43495 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|| Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/98076] Increase speed of integer I/O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98076 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.3|--- --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/65572] ptrmem5.C:7:26: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8629

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65572 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.kokovic at gmail dot com ---

[Bug testsuite/97824] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:14531

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97824 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/101382] function declarations with identical asm label aliasing a target function does not compile with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101382 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Parzefall --- I am wondering whether LTO is wrong or the default handling when not using LTO is wrong. As I understand it, the assembly that is generated in this case is correct. The documentation of GNU as even

[Bug c/97882] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Segmentation Fault on improper redeclaration of function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #9 from

[Bug target/89932] ICE in must_pass_in_stack_var_size_or_pad, at calls.c:5824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89932 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually this one has been fixed while PR 67694 has not. THis is a dup of bug 97882. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 97882 ***

[Bug testsuite/101517] Some testcases were lost when tree-ssa was merged

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101517 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/65573] 13908.C:20:33: internal compiler error: in cp_build_addr_expr_1, at cp/typeck.c:5527

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65573 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.kokovic at gmail dot com ---

[Bug debug/101669] error reading variable from debug information when compiling with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101669 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- What version of gdb are you using?

[Bug c/101171] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_expr_sizeof_expr, at c/c-typeck.c:3006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101171 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||changochen1 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c/93574] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in c_expr_sizeof_expr, at c/c-typeck.c:2925

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/92428] Crash on conflicting types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92428 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/97882] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Segmentation Fault on improper redeclaration of function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97882 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dpotapov at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/60139] Imprecise column number for -pedantic on non-computable initializer element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60139 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||edwin+bugs at etorok dot eu --- Comment

[Bug c/63878] Variables of incomplete type can be defined with -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63878 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug c/24293] Undefined behaviour not diagnosed with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hristo at venev dot name --- Comment #8

[Bug testsuite/16230] Spurious test failures with --disable-static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/101647] [12 regression] excess error in g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist48.C after r12-2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101647 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d014f7b224cb41e9570284d125f4c605cb0ab0a commit r12-2594-g7d014f7b224cb41e9570284d125f4c605cb0ab0a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug testsuite/101647] [12 regression] excess error in g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist48.C after r12-2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101647 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug target/101543] extra zeroing of empty struct argument/return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101543 Tejas Belagod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug d/101657] d: di header file created even if errors occur

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101657 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75f2e3f6cbbb79421b12e399498e9c14241359e7 commit r12-2596-g75f2e3f6cbbb79421b12e399498e9c14241359e7 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug d/96435] d: Returning boolean in a union violates @safe code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c9b7408dc578cb2ae142a5c1b724c183497bdb2 commit r12-2597-g5c9b7408dc578cb2ae142a5c1b724c183497bdb2 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug d/101656] d: Don't escape quoted format strings in escape_d_format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101656 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd4bda42979cb40860a9cd2c0ed188b9a0948cd4 commit r12-2595-gcd4bda42979cb40860a9cd2c0ed188b9a0948cd4 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug d/96435] d: Returning boolean in a union violates @safe code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10490b7a453159f9b602b7f273f0aa6b4caebca7 commit r10-10012-g10490b7a453159f9b602b7f273f0aa6b4caebca7 Author: Iain Buclaw

[Bug testsuite/101531] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by William Schmidt : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49a2cbb3f5906ac20d7a4619d5d3112584d46cf7 commit r9-9654-g49a2cbb3f5906ac20d7a4619d5d3112584d46cf7 Author: Bill Schmidt

[Bug middle-end/101671] pr83510 fails with -Os because threader confuses -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101671 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/98411] [10/11] Pointless: Array larger than ‘-fmax-stack-var-size=’, moved from stack to static storage for main program variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98411 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101676] New: ^ not changed to | if the non-zero don't overlap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101676 Bug ID: 101676 Summary: ^ not changed to | if the non-zero don't overlap Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug d/101664] d: Return the correct value for C++ constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug d/101656] d: Don't escape quoted format strings in escape_d_format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101656 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/96435] d: Returning boolean in a union violates @safe code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96435 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/101531] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr101129.c has excess errors after r11-8780

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101531 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/101664] d: Return the correct value for C++ constructor calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101664 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #0) > C++ constructors return void, even though the front-end semantic treats them > as implicitly returning `this'. But on some targets they actually do return this.

[Bug fortran/100651] Weird memory corruption with multiple triggers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu, |

  1   2   >