https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107147
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||C++-coroutines,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107163
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3)
> We are failing while trying to fold:
>
> c_92 = __builtin_copysignf128 (0.0, c_80(D));
>
> The problem is that c_92 is TFtype but 0.0 is _Float128. TFtype
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107298
--- Comment #3 from John Zwinck ---
Martin, this bug is the only false positive I see in a large corporate
codebase. I think your comment makes it sound like this is a documented thing
where there are tons of false positives and it's not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
Bug ID: 107302
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:242 since
r13-3327-g46a8e017d048ec32
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.4
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107211
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107209
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107300
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |ipa
Summary|ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107300
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107300
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107271
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #3)
> > We are failing while trying to fold:
> >
> > c_92 = __builtin_copysignf128 (0.0, c_80(D));
> >
> > The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107271
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
I remember GIMPLE will canonicalize the selector index to make the first index
always comes the frist vector, means
It excepts canonicalized form like { 3, 0, 0, 4 } with op0 and op1 swapped.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107183
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107301
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ad3cc1ecc3c7c61d5e319f74cb7287fb80944fd
commit r13-3352-g5ad3cc1ecc3c7c61d5e319f74cb7287fb80944fd
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106654
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dda30e9910c4f04a6258b053401249e213f29be
commit r13-3353-g4dda30e9910c4f04a6258b053401249e213f29be
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20221018 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
One can see it in the original dump:
(void) (u0 = TARGET_EXPR , 32, 0>> ,
{u2, { 0 }} , { 0, 1 } > , 16, 0>>;, u0 * D.2388;)
where it used to be:
(void) (u0 = TARGET_EXPR , 32, 0>> ,
{u2, { 0 }} , { 0, 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90201
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prokofjev.d at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106863
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36113
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106990
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107275
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36113
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b3083a598ca3f4b6203284e01ed39ab6ff0844f
commit r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f4b6203284e01ed39ab6ff0844f
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48379
David Crocker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcrocker at eschertech dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105045
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 105045, which changed state.
Bug 105045 Summary: [modules] Can't deduce defaulted template parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105045
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85043
--- Comment #14 from Marek Polacek ---
I've encountered this bug with:
struct S { };
void g(S&&);
void
f (S&& arg)
{
g(S(arg)); // warning: useless cast to type 'struct S'
}
which doesn't compile without the cast, because then "arg" is an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100616
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105044
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 105044, which changed state.
Bug 105044 Summary: [modules] ICE in comptypes, at cp/typeck.cc:1531
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105044
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304
--- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King ---
See: https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng/issues/235
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101697
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I can confirm that building the latest uClibc-ng for h8300 now succeeds with
gcc master @ 4374c424a60777a7658050f0aeb1dcc9af915647.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304
Bug ID: 107304
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at
expr.cc:220 with -march=tigerlake
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304
--- Comment #3 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 53725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53725=edit
Got the issue down to a small reproducer
Ran code through gcc -E, hacked out the irrelevant code, got it down to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107172
--- Comment #40 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Let me repeat: A const_int cannot be assigned to a MODE_CC. It has no meaning.
This is invalid RTL. If it ever works, or worked, that is an accident.
A MODE_CC stands for a comparison (in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107304
--- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 53724
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53724=edit
preprocessed source that can be compiled to show bug
This is the pre-processed output from stress-vecshuf.c,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106933
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106959
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
It looks like the 0.0 with the wrong type is there quite early in the pipeline.
At least by einline (after SSA and CFG have been built) we have:
(gdb) p debug(gs)
c_92 = __builtin_copysignf128 (0.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92ef7822bfd4ea3393e0a1dd40b4abef9fce027f
commit r13-3356-g92ef7822bfd4ea3393e0a1dd40b4abef9fce027f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106995
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[10/11/12/13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101270
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Vogt ---
Fails with 12.2.1 the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 53718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53718=edit
preprocessed testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106099
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106963
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106969
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107282
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Hmm, that commit seems unrelated. Bisection for me points to
r11-2455-gc6ef9d8d3f1122 (with -g).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106923
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106896
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106905
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107275
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aae016f99b121b55fc1bcdfc2403fd22f04fa2df
commit r13-3355-gaae016f99b121b55fc1bcdfc2403fd22f04fa2df
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So in the BB SLP attempt from loop vectorization (or in the BB SLP pass with
-fno-predictive-commoning) we get confused during DR group building because
of a duplicate access and fixup splitting the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107288
--- Comment #2 from Richard Hodges ---
Some extra diagnostic. Reducing to this minimal program:
```
#include
#include
#include
#include
namespace asio = boost::asio;
struct foo
{
std::string s;
int i;
};
struct bar : foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103994
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 107021, which changed state.
Bug 107021 Summary: [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast
-march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021
What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, so that is a different issue then.
And with slightly modified testcase quite old one, which regressed with:
r8-727-g6b6ae9eb9c06b6911573bb9a13cf98b5a7c98b78
template struct VecHelper {
typedef T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-10-18
Summary|[13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101733
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-02 00:00:00 |2022-10-18
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106863
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And it is valid,
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2351
was applied as a DR to C++11 and later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94032
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Fixing the CSE in the testcase by doing
double a[1024];
void foo ()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 1022; i += 2)
{
double tem = a[i+1];
a[i] = tem * a[i];
a[i+1] = a[i+2] * tem;
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a23225fb4f764dfc3e3e729c7d7238f03f282aaa
commit r13-3354-ga23225fb4f764dfc3e3e729c7d7238f03f282aaa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107266
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus ---
First, the committed patch handles something which was wrong with *and* without
BIND(C) and fixed a genuine bug.
* * *
(In reply to kargl from comment #9)
> Please commit the patch in comment #7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107302
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107306
Bug ID: 107306
Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107305
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
