https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113167
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113133
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #6)
> Aha, I see what happened. x/ymm16+ are usable for AVX512F w/o AVX512VL and
> that is why I added that to allow them.
>
> Let me find a way to see if we can fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113176
Bug ID: 113176
Summary: `(n / 4) ? n / 4 : 0` is not optimized to just `n /4`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113176
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I should note the non-constant case is already handled:
```
int unopt(int n, int c) {
if (n / c)
return n / c;
else
return 0;
}
```
It is just the constant case that has issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113143
--- Comment #12 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
libgo/runtime/runtime.h:
#if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(__linux__) && !defined(__CET__)
...
#else
#define __go_context_t ucontext_t
#define __go_getcontext(c) getcontext(c)
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113137
--- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina ---
Created attachment 56963
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56963=edit
maintain-lcssa-peeled.patch
patch undergoing testing for both this and PR113136
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113170
Bug ID: 113170
Summary: ICE: Segfault (template template parameter, alias
template, default value)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113170
--- Comment #1 from Kirkezz ---
I was experimenting with the template template parameters, and ICE occured.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113137
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
ok, x86_64 bootstrap and regtest with -O3 and --enable-checking=yes,rtl,extra
now passes.
aarch64 hit a small issue in libgcc that I'm not sure I should be allowing or
not. will investigate and either
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113165
--- Comment #3 from mecej4 ---
Thanks for the prompt response and the rapid fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113133
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113169
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
last known successful build was 20231214
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113133
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1e7f9abb892443719c82bb17910caa8fb5eeec15
commit r14-6862-g1e7f9abb892443719c82bb17910caa8fb5eeec15
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113168
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113091
--- Comment #8 from Feng Xue ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/641547.html
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20231229 on amdgcn-amdhsa. the offload compiler itself is built
with trunk 20231229
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:984bdeaa39b6417b11736b2c167ef82119e272dc
commit r14-6865-g984bdeaa39b6417b11736b2c167ef82119e272dc
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Kolesa ---
this is the preprocessed source: https://0x0.st/HEt7.ii
It's generated with the following command line:
/builddir/gcc-13.2.1_git20231014/build/./prev-gcc/xg++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Kolesa ---
I don't think builds with completely unchanged source are going to work, as the
compiler won't even reach this point then (at very least several of them are
necessary for stage 1 to build at all)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113167
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So far that's the only fallout I've seen on the embedded targets.
The qemu emulated natives aren't running as I've got some kind of network
problem here and the workers are going offline after a few hours
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172
Bug ID: 113172
Summary: ice in move_early_exit_stmts
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81615
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83181
Eddie Nolan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eddiejnolan at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Daniel Kolesa from comment #4)
> I don't think builds with completely unchanged source are going to work, as
> the compiler won't even reach this point then (at very least several of them
> are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113173
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113171
Bug ID: 113171
Summary: Unneeded zero extend after widening load with SVE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113175
Bug ID: 113175
Summary: [14 Regression] MMIX:
testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc 5x times
slower
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Kolesa ---
If it helps, I have reduced the patches to just the two that strictly necessary
for stage 1 build (I can't get rid of those, sorry, that would be asking for
the impossible), which are:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113152
--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 08:34:38PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113152
>
> --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113169
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113163
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110625
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20231229 on aarch64-linux-gnu, last successful build from
20231214
[...]
libtool: compile: /<>/build/./gcc/gccgo
-B/<>/build/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113152
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #0)
> Created attachment 56949 [details]
> patch with implementation
Not a review, just a comment:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-12-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
Bug ID: 113174
Summary: gcc fails to bootstrap on pp64le with clang-based host
environment (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113171
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113152
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Current patch is incomplete as it fails to scalarize.
It seems I need to remember how to register the new
intrinsic subprograms in trans-intrinsics.cc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113137
--- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113136
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64el-linux-musl
48 matches
Mail list logo
