[Bug analyzer/113253] gcc -g causes -fanalyzer to issue false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113253 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-31 Ever confirmed|0

Enclosed is a voice message for your reference 835-477-0103 - GCC

Time: 1/31/2024 5:13 PM Message length is 0:19 secs

[Bug target/113684] Cross compiler without assembler and linker should assume that all assembler and linker features are available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/113687] -Warray-bounds is not emitted inside class method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113687 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c++/113674] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [[____attr____]] causes internal compiler error: in decl_attributes, at attribs.cc:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113674 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/111403] LoongArch: Wrong code with -O -mlasx -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111403 --- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao --- After r14-5545 this issue became latent. And at some point before r14-5545 this issue became nondeterministic: a compiled program *sometimes* crashes. Really strange...

[Bug rtl-optimization/113682] Branches in branchless binary search rather than cmov/csel/csinc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113682 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I should note that on x86, 2 cmov in a row might be an issue and worse than branches. There is a cost model and the x86 backend rejects that. There are some cores where it is worse. I don't know if it

[Bug c++/113674] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [[____attr____]] causes internal compiler error: in decl_attributes, at attribs.cc:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113674 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Note that [[pure]] int g (int i) { return i; } doesn't crash: pure isn't a standard attribute. The crash seems to occur only with an attribute that is registered twice: the GNU version and the

[Bug fortran/113503] [14 Regression] xtb test miscompilation starting with r14-870

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113503 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is the PR fortran/82774 (alloc_scalar_allocatable_subcomponent): Shorten the function name and replace the symbol argument with the se string length. If a deferred length character length is either not

[Bug c++/113674] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [[____attr____]] causes internal compiler error: in decl_attributes, at attribs.cc:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113674 --- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers --- C supports _Noreturn (and thus ___Noreturn__) as an attribute name, so that code with "#define noreturn _Noreturn" (probably from stdnoreturn.h) works with C23 [[noreturn]].

[Bug target/113686] [RISC-V] TLS (Local Exec) relaxation on structures (LE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113686 palmer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware

[Bug middle-end/110659] Error from linker: .eh_frame_hdr refers to overlapping FDEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110659 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53929 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/113691] New: ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 with function declaration with no parameter specification

c version 14.0.1 20240131 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/113693] ICE: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647 with _BitInt() at -O2 -fdbg-cnt=vect_loop:1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113686] New: [RISC-V] TLS (Local Exec) relaxation on structures (LE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113686 Bug ID: 113686 Summary: [RISC-V] TLS (Local Exec) relaxation on structures (LE) Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/113438] ICE (segfault) in dwarf2out_decl with -g -std=c23 on c23-tag-composite-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6ba433d3c30c20fadd393eed31617a4da81789c commit r14-8666-gf6ba433d3c30c20fadd393eed31617a4da81789c Author: Martin Uecker Date:

[Bug c/113492] ICE: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:557 with -std=c2x -funsigned-bitfields since r14-6808

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113492 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/113690] New: [13/14 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:381 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -funroll-loops

-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.1 20240131 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/111403] LoongArch: Wrong code with -O -mlasx -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111403 --- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > After r14-5545 this issue became latent. > > And at some point before r14-5545 this issue became nondeterministic: a > compiled program *sometimes* crashes. Really

[Bug tree-optimization/113281] [11/12/13 Regression] Latent wrong code due to vectorization of shift reduction and missing promotions since r9-1590

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Target Milestone|14.0

[Bug c++/113683] explicit template instantiation wrongly checks private base class accessibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113683 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- MSVC rejects this also for the same reason: (10): error C2243: 'static_cast': conversion from 'const B *' to 'const A *' exists, but is inaccessible clang accepts it though ...

[Bug libgcc/113402] Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/113687] New: -Warray-bounds is not emitted inside class method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113687 Bug ID: 113687 Summary: -Warray-bounds is not emitted inside class method Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/113692] New: ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 at -O with _BitInt() in a condition

-r14-8665-20240131161256-g3fed1609f61-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.1 20240131 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/112571] [13/14 Regression] ICE with nested redefinition of enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112571 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/93509] Stack protector should offer trap-only handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93509 Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matheus.a.m.moreira at

[Bug modula2/111627] modula2: Excess test fails with a case-preserving-case-insensitive source tree.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111627 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/111403] LoongArch: Wrong code with -O -mlasx -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111403 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- GDB disables ASLR.

[Bug target/111403] LoongArch: Wrong code with -O -mlasx -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111403 --- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #6) > GDB disables ASLR. Indeed, with "setarch -R" it always crashes.

[Bug target/113684] Cross compiler without assembler and linker should assume that all assembler and linker features are available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This usecase is only for GCC developers and it might even confuse regular > users of GCC ... True, such cross compilers are only for GCC developers. Regular won't

[Bug libgcc/113402] Incorrect symbol versions for __builtin_nested_func_ptr_created, __builtin_nested_func_ptr in libgcc_s.so.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113402 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/644521.html

[Bug analyzer/113253] gcc -g causes -fanalyzer to issue false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113253 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- I'm testing a fix. The bug observably affects trunk and gcc 13.2. It it probably also present but latent on gcc 12, 11, and 10 (-Wanalyzer-deref-before-check was added in gcc 13).

[Bug tree-optimization/113692] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 at -O with _BitInt() in a condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- My bet you could get the same error with: _BitInt(129) i; void * foo(void) { void *ret = 0; ret = (void *)(__SIZETYPE__)(i & 1); return ret; }

[Bug target/113618] [14 Regression] AArch64: memmove idiom regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113618 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/90276] PSTL tests fail in Debug Mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276 --- Comment #9 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com --- Here is the reason of the 20_util/specialized_algorithms/pstl/uninitialized_copy_move.cc FAIL. Maybe it fixes some other tests too, I need to run all of them.     libstdc++: Do not forward

[Bug tree-optimization/113693] New: ICE: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647 with _BitInt() at -O2 -fdbg-cnt=vect_loop:1

cking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.1 20240131 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/113692] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 at -O with _BitInt() in a condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-31

[Bug middle-end/113682] Branches in branchless binary search rather than cmov/csel/csinc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113682 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|middle-end --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug testsuite/113685] New: [14 regression] xxx fails after yyy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113685 Bug ID: 113685 Summary: [14 regression] xxx fails after yyy Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug fortran/104908] [11/12/13/14 Regression] incorrect Fortran out-of-bound runtime error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104908 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5741e5fc53161ccf2056e0670334ea528431feb7 commit r13-8266-g5741e5fc53161ccf2056e0670334ea528431feb7 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug middle-end/113607] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv vector: Runtime mismatch at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113607 --- Comment #24 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8123f3ca3fd891034a8366518e756f161c4ff40d commit r14-8668-g8123f3ca3fd891034a8366518e756f161c4ff40d Author: Robin Dapp Date: Tue

[Bug c/113438] ICE (segfault) in dwarf2out_decl with -g -std=c23 on c23-tag-composite-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug c/113688] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-31

[Bug libstdc++/108636] [10 Regression] C++20 undefined reference to `std::filesystem::__cxx11::path::_List::type(std::filesystem::__cxx11::path::_Type)' with -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108636 Mark Bourgeault changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com ---

[Bug target/113684] Cross compiler without assembler and linker should assume that all assembler and linker features are available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||internal-improvement --- Comment #1

[Bug target/113689] New: wrong code with unused _BitInt() division with -O2 -fprofile -mcmodel=large -mavx

with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-8665-20240131161256-g3fed1609f61-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc

[Bug c/113688] New: verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 Bug ID: 113688 Summary: verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/113688] verify_type fails for compatible structs with FAM in C23

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113688 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 See Also|

[Bug c/112571] [13/14 Regression] ICE with nested redefinition of enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112571 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d22d1a9346f27db41459738c6eb404f8f0956e6f commit r14-8669-gd22d1a9346f27db41459738c6eb404f8f0956e6f Author: Joseph Myers Date:

[Bug target/113689] wrong code with unused _BitInt() division with -O2 -fprofile -mcmodel=large -mavx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-31

[Bug c/113696] New: RISC-V: ineffective vsetvl behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113696 Bug ID: 113696 Summary: RISC-V: ineffective vsetvl behavior Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libgomp/113698] GNU OpenMP with OMP_PROC_BIND alters thread affinity in a way that negatively affects performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113698 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.openmp.org/spec-html/5.0/openmpse52.html > Otherwise, the execution environment should not move OpenMP threads between > OpenMP places, thread affinity is enabled, and __the initial thread is

[Bug tree-optimization/113691] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 with function declaration with no parameter specification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113691 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 See Also|

[Bug rtl-optimization/113690] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:381 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113690 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/113657] [14 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault with -mstrict-align and __arm_data512_t since r14-1187-gd6b756447cd58b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113657 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbf847d2c8d1c910948ba34c9338939c67323273 commit r14-8671-gdbf847d2c8d1c910948ba34c9338939c67323273 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug middle-end/113694] New: Allow renaming stack smashing protector symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694 Bug ID: 113694 Summary: Allow renaming stack smashing protector symbols Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug analyzer/113253] gcc -g causes -fanalyzer to issue false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113253 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc7aebff74d8967563fd9af5cb958dfcc8c111e8 commit r14-8670-gcc7aebff74d8967563fd9af5cb958dfcc8c111e8 Author: David Malcolm Date:

[Bug target/113657] [14 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault with -mstrict-align and __arm_data512_t since r14-1187-gd6b756447cd58b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113657 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/113249] RISC-V: regression testsuite errors -mtune=generic-ooo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113249 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Edwin Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b799a16ae59fc0f508c5931ebf1851a3446b707 commit r14-8674-g4b799a16ae59fc0f508c5931ebf1851a3446b707 Author: Edwin Lu Date: Wed Jan 31

[Bug c/113697] New: RISC-V: Redundant vsetvl insn in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113697 Bug ID: 113697 Summary: RISC-V: Redundant vsetvl insn in function Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/113690] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:381 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113690 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug c/113695] New: RISC-V: Sources with different EEW must use different registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113695 Bug ID: 113695 Summary: RISC-V: Sources with different EEW must use different registers Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/113695] RISC-V: Sources with different EEW must use different registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113695 --- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong --- Since both operand are input operand, early clobber "&" constraint can not help.

[Bug libgomp/113698] GNU OpenMP with OMP_PROC_BIND alters thread affinity in a way that negatively affects performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113698 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually I misread the testcase, because it looks like LLVM's libomp follows the same as GCC's. And it looks like the OpenMP spec is specific about that behavior too.

[Bug middle-end/113694] Allow renaming stack smashing protector symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug analyzer/113253] gcc -g causes -fanalyzer to issue false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113253 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Should be fixed on trunk for gcc 14 by the above patch. Keeping open to backport to other branches.

[Bug middle-end/93509] Stack protector should offer trap-only handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93509 --- Comment #3 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira --- Equivalent feature request in the LLVM issue tracker: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/80236

[Bug libgomp/113698] New: GNU OpenMP with OMP_PROC_BIND alters thread affinity in a way that negatively affects performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113698 Bug ID: 113698 Summary: GNU OpenMP with OMP_PROC_BIND alters thread affinity in a way that negatively affects performance Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113699] New: during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in var_to_partition (tree-ssa-live.h:163) with _BitInt() used in __asm__

--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-8665-20240131161256-g3fed1609f61-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.1 20240131 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/113560] Strange code generated when optimizing a multiplication on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113560 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f14c0dbb789852947cb58fdf7d3162413f053fa commit r14-8680-g2f14c0dbb789852947cb58fdf7d3162413f053fa Author: Roger Sayle Date: Thu

[Bug tree-optimization/113692] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 at -O with _BitInt() in a condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- integer to pointer conversions are not constrained in GIMPLE, only pointer-to-int widening conversions are.

[Bug middle-end/113669] -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113669 --- Comment #3 from Jiajing_Zheng --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > This is because already the FE optimizes it, when it sees that > ((int)(g_B * g_A[1])) & (g_A[1] & g_A[0]) | g_A[0] > is just being added to unsigned char

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 --- Comment #2 from Niclas Rosenvik --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > >I tried to add the gcc12 and up parts of > > It is correct except it should just use GCC 14 I think. I forgot to mention that the problem with _Float16 aka

[Bug middle-end/113699] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in var_to_partition (tree-ssa-live.h:163) with _BitInt() used in __asm__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113699 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-01

[Bug testsuite/113685] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-117.c fails profile checking with Invalid sum after r14-4089-gd45ddc2c04e471

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113685 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-01 CC|

[Bug middle-end/113699] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in var_to_partition (tree-ssa-live.h:163) with _BitInt() used in __asm__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113699 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The code for lowering asm is not expecting an SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF here ...

[Bug target/111403] LoongArch: Wrong code with -O -mlasx -fopenmp-simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111403 --- Comment #8 from Chenghui Pan --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > After r14-5545 this issue became latent. > > And at some point before r14-5545 this issue became nondeterministic: a > compiled program *sometimes* crashes. Really

[Bug rust/113553] rust fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Which glibc are you using? See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82346 and maybe https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22146

[Bug libgcc/113700] New: libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 Bug ID: 113700 Summary: libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16 Product: gcc

[Bug target/113684] Cross compiler without assembler and linker should assume that all assembler and linker features are available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I'm usually having cross assembler/linker around as they are easy to build.

[Bug c++/113687] -Warray-bounds is not emitted inside class method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113687 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||56456 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >I tried to add the gcc12 and up parts of It is correct except it should just use GCC 14 I think.

[Bug target/113690] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:381 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113690 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/113669] -fsanitize=undefined failed to check a signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113669 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-31

[Bug tree-optimization/113670] ICE with vectors in named registers and -fno-vect-cost-model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/113668] [14 Regression] libgo soname bump needed for the GCC 14 release?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/99395] s116 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 --- Comment #14 from JuzheZhong --- Thanks Richard. It seems that we can't fix this issue for now. Is that right ? If I understand correctly, do you mean we should wait after SLP representations are finished and then revisit this PR?

[Bug c++/113674] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [[____attr____]] causes internal compiler error: in decl_attributes, at attribs.cc:776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113674 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113678] SLP misses up vec_concat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113678 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-31

[Bug tree-optimization/113676] [12 Regression] Miscompilation tree-vrp __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113676 --- Comment #2 from Magnus Hokland Hegdahl --- Hi, here's a version that doesn't need -std=c++20 or argv: https://godbolt.org/z/Y9ooY998e #include constexpr auto bit_ceil(unsigned x) -> unsigned { if (x <= 1) return 1U; int w = 32 -

[Bug target/113633] FAIL: gcc.dg/bf-ms-attrib.c execution test, wrong size for ms_struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113633 LIU Hao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/99395] s116 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 --- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 > > --- Comment #18 from JuzheZhong --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from

[Bug c/113679] New: long long minus double with gcc -m32 produces different results than other compilers or gcc -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113679 Bug ID: 113679 Summary: long long minus double with gcc -m32 produces different results than other compilers or gcc -m64 Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status:

[Bug target/113679] long long minus double with gcc -m32 produces different results than other compilers or gcc -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113679 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah, it is, that is how excess precision behaves. Due to the cast applying just to l rather than l - d it returns 0.0 with -fexcess-precision=standard, but if you change it to (double)(l - d) then it will

[Bug tree-optimization/113670] ICE with vectors in named registers and -fno-vect-cost-model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113670 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:924137b9012cee5603482242de08fbf0b2030f6a commit r14-8645-g924137b9012cee5603482242de08fbf0b2030f6a Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/99395] s116 benchmark of TSVC is vectorized by clang and not by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 31 Jan 2024, juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99395 > > --- Comment #14 from JuzheZhong --- > Thanks Richard. > > It seems that we

[Bug tree-optimization/113670] ICE with vectors in named registers and -fno-vect-cost-model

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|14.0| Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113676] [12 Regression] Miscompilation tree-vrp __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113676 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/113676] [12 Regression] Miscompilation tree-vrp __builtin_unreachable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113676 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- And with --param=vrp1-mode=vrp it segfaulted even with r13-4276-gce917b0422c145779b83e005afd8433c0c86fb06 but the next revision removed that parameter, so can't go further.

  1   2   >