https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101523
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 57599
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57599=edit
Testcase - somewhat reduced from libecpint
Verified with rev 146f16c97f6
cc1plus -O2 t.cc
try_combine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114184
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea1c16f95b8fbaba4a7f3663ff9933ebedfb92a5
commit r14-9289-gea1c16f95b8fbaba4a7f3663ff9933ebedfb92a5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114225
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114220
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asharafutdinov at adalisk dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114184
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Summary|[12/13/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217
--- Comment #11 from Akihiko Odaki ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Akihiko Odaki from comment #8)
> > It would certainly workaround the issue, but it's only dirtier and brings no
> > benefit except suppressed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||internal-improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114192
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114225
Bug ID: 114225
Summary: False positive -Werror=dangling-reference
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Akihiko Odaki from comment #11)
> So there are two constructs invoking UBs but ignored by UBSan: 1)
That is an understatement. UBSan is a best effort which diagnoses some forms of
undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114217
--- Comment #13 from Akihiko Odaki ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> (In reply to Akihiko Odaki from comment #11)
> > So there are two constructs invoking UBs but ignored by UBSan: 1)
>
> That is an understatement. UBSan is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Wmisspelled-isr
> Target C C++ Var(avr_warn_misspelled_isr) Init(1)
> Warn if the ISR is misspelled, ...
>
> should eventually work?
With that, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114192
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 57600
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57600=edit
patch
Ah, so the issue is that we only replace the LHS, in this case we pass
the reduction stmt for the early exit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114192
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
vect-early-break_104-pr113373.c might be such case which ICEs then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114193
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114198
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Probably also with -fwhole-program instead of -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114225
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Please note that this is a regression in GCC 13. GCC 12 (or other compilers) do
not show a warning here: https://godbolt.org/z/Yhfad47xs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114225
--- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Fedor Chelnokov from comment #2)
> Please note that this is a regression in GCC 13. GCC 12 (or other compilers)
> do not show a warning here: https://godbolt.org/z/Yhfad47xs
No, GCC 12 does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> How did you specify 'Target'?
Like:
Wmisspelled-isr
Target Warning C C++ Var(avr_warn_misspelled_isr) Init(1)
Warn if the ISR is misspelled, ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114225
--- Comment #4 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Ok.
At the same time we see that some false positives of this warning are fixed in
Trunk, e.g.
struct A {
int i;
};
struct Getter {
const A * a;
const int & value() const { return a->i; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114226
Bug ID: 114226
Summary: ICE on valid vanilla code when xtheadvector enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114211
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114226
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114223
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #0)
> I want to create a treeless-copy of the git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git .
N.B. you could have just used https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114226
Bruce Hoult changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113418
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:889fbc9454e2d4e2b9a11a9e02b3b7e698edcd1c
commit r14-9290-g889fbc9454e2d4e2b9a11a9e02b3b7e698edcd1c
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Tue Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114206
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024, gjl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114191
>
> --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |target
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114209
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c27148f2f40654a638bcf429633be1c0561529d5
commit r14-9291-gc27148f2f40654a638bcf429633be1c0561529d5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114226
--- Comment #2 from Bruce Hoult ---
Created attachment 57601
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57601=edit
compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114192
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #15 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
Your implementation still needs to solve:
1. Loss of precision because of division & subsequent scaling by max. Users
comparing std::hypot(x, y, z) against a simple std::sqrt(x * x + y * y + z * z)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114192
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:324d2907c86f05e40dc52d226940308f53a956c2
commit r14-9292-g324d2907c86f05e40dc52d226940308f53a956c2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114203
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cde50296a19b109909089b91d532d2c8455f5f10
commit r14-9293-gcde50296a19b109909089b91d532d2c8455f5f10
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114203
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.0
Summary|[13/14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114216
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea9ac2a00d1e4126d61b65a8302c2bd523f0b99
commit r14-9294-gdea9ac2a00d1e4126d61b65a8302c2bd523f0b99
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114172
Bruce Hoult changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruce at hoult dot org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114216
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114136
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] ERROR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114227
Bug ID: 114227
Summary: InstallTerminationProcedure does not work with -fiso
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #35 from Richard Sandiford ---
Maybe I've misunderstood the flow of the ticket, but it looks to me like we do
still correctly recognise the truncating scatter stores. And, on their own, we
would be able to convert them into masked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112758
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113122
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be now fixed for GCC 14 and GCC 13.3+ too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110754
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90348
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 Regression]|[11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114007
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be now fixed for GCC 13.3+ too, though in that case I've committed a
simplified version, which just parses the adjacent :: in __has_*attribute
argument, but yields in that case 0 in the strict
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE |[12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114090
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114197
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is really unexpected if-conversion which ends up putting the
vector copy of an innner loop outside of the enclosing loop of a scalar
loop. Such mishap usually happens because of simplifications.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 regression]|[11/12/13 Regression] gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111075
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400
--- Comment #4 from Илья Шипицин ---
will it be fixed in 12.4 ?
пн, 4 мар. 2024 г. в 13:59, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111441
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400
--- Comment #5 from Илья Шипицин ---
quick question, is it going to be fixed in 12.4 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113979
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113993
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for GCC 13.3+, though in that case I haven't changed the behavior
for *l builtins, just added *f32x and *f64x builtin support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110115
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114227
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-03-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114164
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a19ab1c42aba47fbfb122a6160f504565aef0943
commit r14-9295-ga19ab1c42aba47fbfb122a6160f504565aef0943
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92387
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108708
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109014
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108722
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110928
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112975
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113619
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113505
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113536
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114228
Bug ID: 114228
Summary: memset/memcpy loop not always recognised with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113441
--- Comment #36 from Richard Sandiford ---
Created attachment 57602
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57602=edit
proof-of-concept patch to suppress peeling for gaps
This patch does what I suggested in the previous comment:
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo