Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: segher at kernel dot crashing.org
Target Milestone: ---
The emulation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94812
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95456
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95456
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 95456, which changed state.
Bug 95456 Summary: [11 Regression] gcc/gcc.c:6035:16: runtime error: null
pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95456
||2020-06-08
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 48706
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48706&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95224
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
That's not expected, but it seems highly suspicious indeed. I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95224
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95365
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95538
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva ---
More likely we've just always missed these lto dump files: IIRC they used to be
created in tmpdir, even during -save-temps builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
but is .dSYM ever generated when no -g is present?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
that's because of the second input gcc_tg.o
can you tell where that comes from?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva ---
In case that's from some board config file, I suggest prefixing it with -Wl, so
that it doesn't count as an additional input.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva ---
now, if it is from the board config file, maybe it had better be moved to
ldflags or libs; both of them undergo some -Wl, treatment of object files and
libs already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 48886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48886&action=edit
patch that hopefully fixes the problem
Does this fix the problem in your testglue-requiring test runs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48886|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95720
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96230
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Assignee: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Consider:
typedef unsigned char T;
T i[2];
int f() {
T *p = &i[0], *q = &i[1];
T c = __builtin_add_overflow(*p, 1, p);
*q += c;
}
The desired code sequence on x86_64 is:
ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96965
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva ---
One nit: I wrote the flag-setting non-canonical compare ended up in i0, but it
actually becomes i1, with the original i1 (R) moved to i0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93399
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva ---
I suppose it would make sense for str_pattern_slim to quote line breaks
and other active characters when printing out string literals. And
perhaps to eliminate one more use of str_pattern_slim while at tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-09-11
21:20:11 UTC ---
I guess we have to somehow local all death points of the pseudo in paths
towards the debug use, and insert debug insns binding the same debug temp to
the pseudo before all of the dea
||2012-09-23
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-09-23
11:36:13 UTC ---
Mine. Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54177
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
19:58:41 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 19:58:37 2012
New Revision: 191999
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191999
Log:
PR debug/54177
* var-tracking.c (vt_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:05:29 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:05:24 2012
New Revision: 192000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192000
Log:
PR debug/53135
* dwarf2out.c (value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:06:13 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 2 20:06:08 2012
New Revision: 192001
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192001
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/54551
* Mak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:16:33 UTC ---
Fixed in the trunk. Backporting to 4.7...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-02
20:17:53 UTC ---
The work around is installed in the trunk, and will soon be in the branch as
well, but this should ideally be left open until we figure out a better way to
avoid all the dupl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-03
04:02:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 3 04:02:38 2012
New Revision: 192021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192021
Log:
PR debug/53135
* dwarf2out.c (value
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54831
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-08
14:10:25 UTC ---
Marek, the patch looks good, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54796
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-08
14:37:53 UTC ---
I'm a bit uncomfortable with this approach. On the one hand, it's quite
simple, which is nice, but if all we get from it is the base term, we'll still
have trouble given mult
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-14
21:19:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 28447
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28447
Work in progress patch
This patch improves jump threading so that it won't drop debug inf
||2012-10-26
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-26
07:16:35 UTC ---
Patchset for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54953
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-26
07:42:07 UTC ---
Without your poposed change, AFTER_WITH_REG is only used while adding
REG_UNUSED marks to REG defs. That the REG def is unused means it's going to
be discarded and, when it i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:26:21 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:26:16 2012
New Revision: 192957
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192957
Log:
PR debug/54693
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:27:11 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:09 2012
New Revision: 192958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192958
Log:
PR debug/54693
* loop-unroll.c (loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:27:39 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:31 2012
New Revision: 192959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192959
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:27:39 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:31 2012
New Revision: 192959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192959
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:36:52 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:36:47 2012
New Revision: 192961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192961
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/54693
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:37:31 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:37:25 2012
New Revision: 192962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192962
Log:
PR debug/54693
* gcc/valtrack.c (de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-30
23:47:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 30 23:47:35 2012
New Revision: 193003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193003
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-30
23:47:44 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 30 23:47:35 2012
New Revision: 193003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193003
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-11-04
18:44:18 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Nov 4 18:44:13 2012
New Revision: 193138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193138
Log:
PR debug/54693
* tree-ssa-threadedg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-11-04
18:44:32 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Nov 4 18:44:25 2012
New Revision: 193139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193139
Log:
PR debug/54693
* tree-ssa-loop-ivop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-11-06
17:59:04 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Nov 6 17:58:52 2012
New Revision: 193251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193251
Log:
PR debug/54693
* tree-ssa-threadedg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-17
06:19:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 22792
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22792
Patch I'm testing that fixes the bug
Here's what I meant. It does fix the bug at hand, and (surpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-17
06:23:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22793
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22793
Patch I'm testing that fixes the bug
Instead of just dropping the debug info on the floor, I figur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-18
06:24:55 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Dec 18 06:24:52 2010
New Revision: 168013
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168013
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46782
* cfgcleanup.c (tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46756
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-18
06:25:12 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Dec 18 06:25:09 2010
New Revision: 168014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168014
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46756
* jump.c (mark_all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46756
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22792|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22806|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-22
03:49:06 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Dec 22 03:49:00 2010
New Revision: 168160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168160
Log:
PR debug/46724
* function.c (assign_parms_augme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46931
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-28
20:20:32 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Dec 28 20:20:29 2010
New Revision: 168299
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168299
Log:
PR debug/46931
* tree-vect-loop-manip.c (slpeel_
||2010.12.28 21:30:43
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-28
21:30:43 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-28
23:04:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 22863
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22863
Patch that fixes the problem
Here's the patch that I'm testing.
||2010.12.30 20:09:30
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-30
20:09:30 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-12-30
20:15:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 22870
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22870
Patch that fixes the bug, regstrapping
When estimating the stack size of a function, we shouldn't
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-06
17:50:25 UTC ---
Mine
||2011.01.06 21:52:36
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-06
21:53:42 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46535
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-13
07:27:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22955
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22955
Patch that fixes the bug, testing with enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap-O3
Here's the patch I'm tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-13
09:07:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 22956
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22956
Another approach to fix the problem
Here's another approach that IMHO is more consistent: instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
--- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-13
10:31:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 22957
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22957
Updated patch, still awaiting review
The patch to fix this bug, posted on Sept 21, is still await
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-14
09:54:54 UTC ---
Yeah, sorry, the *s were not supposed to be there in the variable names, only
in the help message. I fixed that shortly after posting the patch here, when I
first noticed the probl
||2011.01.14 21:33:47
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
||FIXED
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-14
22:29:47 UTC ---
Fixed in revision 167791.
||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-14
22:30:38 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46977
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47215
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-16
08:13:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 22978
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22978
Patch that fixes the problem by discarding too unsafe optimizations
When there's more than one exi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-16
08:28:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 22979
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22979
Patch that fixes (papers over?) the bug by compensating for the unsafe
assumption
Here's another a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22978|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre
||2011.01.16 11:50:32
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43657
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-16
12:29:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 22982
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22982
Proposed patch
This avoids the transformation, but... Is the test too strict? My reasoning
is th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-19
22:00:08 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:00:00 2011
New Revision: 169034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169034
Log:
PR debug/47079
PR debug/46724
* function.c (inst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-19
22:00:09 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:00:00 2011
New Revision: 169034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169034
Log:
PR debug/47079
PR debug/46724
* function.c (ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47079
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-19
22:07:16 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Jan 19 22:07:14 2011
New Revision: 169035
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169035
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46240
* tree-into-ssa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46583
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-20
16:56:30 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 20 16:56:25 2011
New Revision: 169058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169058
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/46583
* tree-ssa-live.c
1 - 100 of 1100 matches
Mail list logo
