[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

2013-03-07 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 --- Comment #15 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2013-03-07 23:03:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) I just tried out to bootstrap r196092 on mingw32. There is still one more cast patch missing to make it work

[Bug libstdc++/51140] New: libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_tm.cc:48: undefined reference to `___sync_sub_and_fetch_4'

2011-11-15 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51140 Bug #: 51140 Summary: libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_tm.cc:48: undefined reference to `___sync_sub_and_fetch_4' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/51140] libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_tm.cc:48: undefined reference to `___sync_sub_and_fetch_4'

2011-11-15 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51140 --- Comment #1 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-15 12:39:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) There is another use of __sync_sub_and_fetch in libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_tm.cc, I meant libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_throw.cc

[Bug libstdc++/51181] [4.7 regression] libstdc++.so __sync_sub_and_fetch_4 linkage error causing many test suite failures on m68k-linux

2011-11-22 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181 Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cestrauss

[Bug libstdc++/51140] libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_tm.cc:48: undefined reference to `___sync_sub_and_fetch_4'

2011-11-22 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51140 Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-11-22 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #9 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-22 21:49:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Hmm, this is due usage of %lld in printf-formatter. Does following patch fix your issue? I did encounter the build failure

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-11-23 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #10 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-24 00:22:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #7) Hmm, this is due usage of %lld in printf-formatter. Does following patch fix your issue? I did

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-11-27 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #11 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-27 20:55:15 UTC --- Created attachment 25922 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25922 Debug log of PR49084 The cause of the access violation is due

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-11-27 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #13 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-11-28 00:46:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Zero is UNKNOWN_LOCATION. The problem is probably that the location mapping isn't initialized yet. What happens if you move

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-12-07 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #15 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-12-08 01:23:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Unfortunately I don't seem to be able to reproduce on Linux. Could you see what object code has been generated for the line

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-12-10 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #16 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-12-10 23:03:13 UTC --- As can be seen in the assembler code above, the Ada compiler thinks the Node structure is 32 bytes in size, while the C compiler thinks its size is 36 bytes

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

2011-12-13 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #23 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2011-12-14 01:03:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) Patch applied. Thanks! Good to have Ada back on x86 MinGW. Regards, Cesar

[Bug 43601] (c++) Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2010-09-23 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #24 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-09-24 04:19:19 UTC --- The wxWidgets build enables precompiled headers on MSVC by default, while the GCC build does not use them. As it turns out, this setting affects the object

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2010-09-24 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #27 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-09-25 03:07:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) So I would like to see some proper detailed analysis on object files establishing exactly what constitutes all this bloat

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2010-09-25 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #28 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-09-26 01:11:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) So I would like to see some proper detailed analysis on object files establishing exactly what constitutes all this bloat

[Bug c++/43601] Enormous increase in DLL object files size in 4.5

2010-09-27 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43601 --- Comment #32 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-09-28 00:16:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) This is somewhat off topic but unfortunately (MinGW) c++filt doesn't work for me, e.g.: % echo '.text

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

2010-11-23 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #14 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-11-24 00:00:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 22400 [details] Proposed patch Does this patch work for you on Cygwin? Dear Jorn, I tried your patch

[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

2010-12-02 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #19 from Cesar Strauss cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-12-02 23:38:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) (In reply to comment #17) * anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:25:49AM CET: It is interesting

[Bug libgcj/42986] natVMSecureRandom.cc error: expected type-specifier

2010-05-16 Thread cestrauss at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from cestrauss at gmail dot com 2010-05-16 20:00 --- I can confirm this mingw32 libgcj build failure exists on current trunk (4.6.0 revision 159436). The original patch attached to this report does solve the issue for me, after updating it so it applies cleanly. Regards