[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 01:32:06 UTC --- There are 2 issues here: 1. Should we use movdqu(%eax), %xmm0# 19*movti_internal_rex64/4[length = 5] movdqa%xmm0, (%rsp

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 01:39:16 UTC --- We don't properly handle memory operand in (insn 19 17 20 2 (set (reg:TI 85 [ *_15 ]) (mem:TI (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI 82)) [0 *_15+0 S16 A32

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 01:58:31 UTC --- We fail to see (mem:TI (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI 82))) is offsettable.

[Bug target/55258] New: SSE register isn't used for 16byte copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55258 Bug #: 55258 Summary: SSE register isn't used for 16byte copy Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 02:30:16 UTC --- Something like this: diff --git a/gcc/explow.c b/gcc/explow.c index 6109832..9ec38f9 100644 --- a/gcc/explow.c +++ b/gcc/explow.c @@ -84,12 +84,22

[Bug middle-end/55259] New: plus_constant doesn't handle zero-extended address properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259 Bug #: 55259 Summary: plus_constant doesn't handle zero-extended address properly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/55259] plus_constant doesn't handle zero-extended address properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 04:13:32 UTC --- A potential fix: diff --git a/gcc/emit-rtl.c b/gcc/emit-rtl.c index 95bbfa7..d7c454c 100644 --- a/gcc/emit-rtl.c +++ b/gcc/emit-rtl.c @@ -2109,6

[Bug target/55258] SSE register isn't used for 16byte copy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55258 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 08:52:22 UTC --- Created attachment 28651 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28651 Something like this

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-10 19:11:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) ~/gcc-build/gcc/cc1 -O2 -mx32 -maddress-mode=long pr55247.c results in following sequence

[Bug middle-end/55259] plus_constant doesn't handle zero-extended address properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55259 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55247] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55279] New: New pseudo registers aren't supported in CSE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279 Bug #: 55279 Summary: New pseudo registers aren't supported in CSE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-12 04:08:02 UTC --- Can we limit (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y))) to (plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (FOO:SI)) (const_int Y)) transformation to Y TARGET

[Bug middle-end/55279] New pseudo registers aren't supported in CSE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55279 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-12 07:25:27 UTC --- If we revert the explow.c change: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=177592 gcc.dg/Warray-bounds.c will cause valgrind error with -fno

[Bug rtl-optimization/55290] New: LRA depends on uninitialised values

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55290 Bug #: 55290 Summary: LRA depends on uninitialised values Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug objc/55291] New: libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 Bug #: 55291 Summary: libsanitizer doesn't build multilib Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/55292] New: libsanitizer doesn't support x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55292 Bug #: 55292 Summary: libsanitizer doesn't support x32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug objc/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 00:33:06 UTC --- configure.ac has #AM_ENABLE_MULTILIB(, ..)

[Bug other/55304] New: libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 Bug #: 55304 Summary: libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug objc/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 03:48:39 UTC --- After I fixed configure.ac, make install gave me: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c libasan.la '/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/release

[Bug objc/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug other/55292] libsanitizer doesn't support x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55292 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 11:27:39 UTC --- One problem is AM_PROG_LIBTOOL, which is the part of libtool. GCC autoconf doesn't use libtool since we have in-tree libtool. To use GCC autoconf, we need

[Bug target/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http

[Bug objc/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55307] libgcc's __cpu_indicator_init does not check for avx correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55307 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/55299] missed optimization: ASR idiom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 18:21:30 UTC --- This regression is triggered by revision 188008: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00038.html aka the un-sign-extension of sizetype constants.

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug other/55292] libsanitizer doesn't support x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55292 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-14 15:06:44 UTC --- With revision 193500, we got libdecnumber -I../../src-trunk/gcc/../libdecnumber/bid -I../libdecnumber -I../../src-trunk/gcc/../libbacktrace../../src

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-14 15:08:53 UTC --- There are badness = (relative_time_benefit (callee_info, edge, edge_time) * (INT_MIN / 16 / RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE

[Bug other/55291] libsanitizer doesn't build multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55051] [4.8 Regression] profiledbootstrap failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55051 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 00:30:51 UTC --- Revision 193513 gave: ../../src-trunk/gcc/common/common-targhooks.c: In function 'default_target_handle_option(gcc_options*, gcc_options

[Bug other/55333] New: [x32] 8 asan test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55333 Bug #: 55333 Summary: [x32] 8 asan test failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug other/55333] [x32] StackTrace::FastUnwindStack wrong x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55333 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[x32] 8 asan test failures |[x32

[Bug other/55304] libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 14:11:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) That's strange but on x86 I see CDPATH=${ZSH_VERSION+.}: cd ../../../libsanitizer /bin/sh /export/users/izamyati/tmp_gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools

[Bug bootstrap/53866] [4.8 Regression] lto-bootstrap failed at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53866 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-15 20:31:18 UTC --- Revision gave 193535: /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/c/c-parser.c: In function \u2018c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary(c_parser*, unsigned int

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 00:34:07 UTC --- Revision 193543 gave: lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xb37547 crash_signal ../../src-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:334 0x6c0763

[Bug other/55333] libsanitizer StackTrace::FastUnwindStack wrong x32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55333 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 15:38:42 UTC --- BTW, it works for me with --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.8.0 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local --enable-gnu-indirect

[Bug other/55358] New: Valgrind errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55358 Bug #: 55358 Summary: Valgrind errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/55360] [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-16 23:46:25 UTC --- Is this related to PR 28831?

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-17 15:47:56 UTC --- [hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.c int main () { } [hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -flto /tmp/x.c ==17373== Invalid read of size 8 ==17373

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-17 16:15:50 UTC --- When I add --db-attach=yes, valgrind doesn't report any error.

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-17 16:30:20 UTC --- ==17631== Invalid read of size 8 ==17631==at 0x6B2522: output_symtab() (lto-cgraph.c:589) ==17631==by 0x6B87B5: lto_output() (lto-streamer-out.c

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-17 17:20:19 UTC --- There is a bad memory access in LTO.

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-17 17:30:25 UTC --- It can be reproduced with LTO bootstrap on hjl/valgrind branch at http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=summary with --enable-checking=valgrind.

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-17 20:35:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Answering my own question: we can get static linking with -Wl,-Bstatic -lasan -Wl,-Bdynamic -ldl -lpthread The -static

[Bug bootstrap/55370] New: [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55370 Bug #: 55370 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/55370] [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55370 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/55371] New: [asan] False -Werror=uninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55371 Bug #: 55371 Summary: [asan] False -Werror=uninitialized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/55374] New: [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 Bug #: 55374 Summary: [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug other/55374] [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-18 01:18:07 UTC --- -Bstatic -lasan -Bdynamic must be placed before -Bstatic -lstdc++ -Bdynamic.

[Bug other/55374] [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-18 01:29:57 UTC --- Even without -static-libasan, shouldn't -lasan be placed before -lstdc++? [hjl@gnu-tools-1 prev-gcc]$ ./g++ -B./ -faddress-sanitizer x.o -B../prev

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-18 13:15:59 UTC --- I got /tmp/cc5sWfOD.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cc5sWfOD.s:824391: Error: invalid character (0xf7) in mnemonic make[7]: *** [/tmp/ccpgVF41.ltrans24.ltrans.o

[Bug driver/55379] New: -static -static-libasan doesn't create static binary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55379 Bug #: 55379 Summary: -static -static-libasan doesn't create static binary Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug driver/55379] -static -static-libasan doesn't create static binary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55379 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-18 14:52:24 UTC --- It should be [hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ x.o -o x -faddress-sanitizer -B../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libsanitizer/asan/.libs/ -static-libasan

[Bug driver/55379] -static -static-libasan pass -Bdynamic to linker

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55379 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-static -static-libasan |-static

[Bug bootstrap/55380] New: All search_line_fast implementations read beyond buffer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55380 Bug #: 55380 Summary: All search_line_fast implementations read beyond buffer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/55379] -static -static-libasan pass -Bdynamic to linker

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55379 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-18 19:35:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Note: fully static linking is not supported by libsanitizer at all and I don't think it will. Reason: on linux asan uses dlsym

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-19 20:54:53 UTC --- It works for me on Fedora 17 with --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-languages=c,ada,c++ --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.8.0

[Bug c/55397] New: [asan] -faddress-sanitizer should define a CPP macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55397 Bug #: 55397 Summary: [asan] -faddress-sanitizer should define a CPP macro Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-19 21:04:12 UTC --- On hjl/asan branch, I got (gdb) r Starting program: /export/build/gnu/gcc-lto-asan/build-x86_64-linux/prev-gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed /tmp/x.i -quiet

[Bug other/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 00:14:50 UTC --- I tried ../gcc/configure --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-languages=c,ada,c++ --prefix=/usr/gnat --with-local

[Bug middle-end/55407] New: stack-buffer-overflow in compute_working_sets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55407 Bug #: 55407 Summary: stack-buffer-overflow in compute_working_sets Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/55397] [asan] -faddress-sanitizer should define a CPP macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55397 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 05:37:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) If we end up implementing a macro, may I ask it to be named ADDRESS_SANITIZER? This name is already used in a few places

[Bug middle-end/55407] stack-buffer-overflow in compute_working_sets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55407 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/55417] [4.8 Regression] AddressSanitizer reports stack-buffer-overflow in profiling code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools

[Bug gcov-profile/55417] [4.8 Regression] AddressSanitizer reports stack-buffer-overflow in profiling code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/55397] [asan] -faddress-sanitizer should define a CPP macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55397 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/55440] New: Plugin tests is compiled with wrong CFLAGS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55440 Bug #: 55440 Summary: Plugin tests is compiled with wrong CFLAGS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING

[Bug sanitizer/55379] -static -static-libasan pass -Bdynamic to linker

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55379 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/55379] -static -static-libasan pass -Bdynamic to linker

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55379 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-23 20:32:35 UTC --- I still got the same failure as in comment #13 with revision 193763.

[Bug sanitizer/55450] libtool: install: error: cannot install `libtsan.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55450 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug sanitizer/55313] libsanitizer cannot be installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55455] New: [4.8 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55455 Bug #: 55455 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Failed to bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/55456] New: [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55456 Bug #: 55456 Summary: [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/55455] [4.8 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55455 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55456] [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 is miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55456 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-24 16:39:00 UTC --- LTO miscompiled: /* Skip frontend and driver specific options here. */ if (!(cl_options[option-opt_index].flags (CL_COMMON|CL_TARGET

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-24 16:49:43 UTC --- I think LTO is confused extern const struct cl_option cl_options[]; with extern const struct cl_option cl_options*;

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-24 17:03:13 UTC --- The same issue can be reproduced with this patch: diff --git a/gcc/lto-opts.c b/gcc/lto-opts.c index a235f41..cd3730b 100644 --- a/gcc/lto-opts.c +++ b

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] LTO miscompiled external array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-25 07:33:50 UTC --- This was introduced between revision 191465 and revision 191714.

[Bug lto/54795] [4.8 Regression] LTO miscompiled external array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |lto

[Bug other/54691] [4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=valgrind doesn't build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54691 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-25 22:15:22 UTC --- This patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01973.html works.

[Bug lto/54795] [4.8 Regression] LTO miscompiled external array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-25 22:36:48 UTC --- Another problem with revision 191466 is we lost debug info on cl_options. With revision 191465, I got (gdb) whatis cl_options type = const struct

[Bug lto/54795] [4.8 Regression] LTO miscompiled external array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-25 22:39:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) Another problem with revision 191466 is we lost debug info on cl_options. With revision 191465, I got (gdb) whatis

[Bug lto/55466] New: [4.8 Regression] Revision 191466 destroyed DWARF debug info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55466 Bug #: 55466 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Revision 191466 destroyed DWARF debug info Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug lto/54795] [4.8 Regression] LTO miscompiled external array access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-26 13:29:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) This means that somewhere there is a cl_option definition that may prevail that has size 1. lto_symtab_resolve_symbols

[Bug driver/55470] New: Enable both ld and gold in gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55470 Bug #: 55470 Summary: Enable both ld and gold in gcc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >