https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16B, aka CX16. But -mcx16 doesn't define __CX16__.
>
> It's called
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > > > x86-64-v2 includes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
The problem is triggered by missing config/bootstrap-debug.mk. But
cccS9GKD.s is is odd.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451
Bug ID: 97451
Summary: [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed
--with-build-config=bootstrap-cet
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
The real updated patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554385.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97480
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
It is caused by r11-3998:
commit 540d5f4f0215e1cdd2d4a2c89c65e46033298be0
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Wed Oct 14 15:37:51 2020 +0200
Refactor vect_get_and_check_slp_defs some more
This refactors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97482
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96827
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vkkerrata at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95483
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97473
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nate Eldredge from comment #0)
>
> On x86_64-linux-gnu, gcc generates instructions to align the stack and place
> the spilled copy of x at an aligned address, and the testcase passes there.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|8.4.1
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97054
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
Bug ID: 97247
Summary: Typo in
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Typo in |Typos in
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The updated patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97257
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97259
Bug ID: 97259
Summary: Incorrect ENQCMD and ENQCMDS patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97257
Bug ID: 97257
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/movdir64b.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96827
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281
Bug ID: 97281
Summary: Mark- march=x86-64-v[234] binaries
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97280
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
Bug ID: 97541
Summary: Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is
already occupied by a different file
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So isn't that yet another thing that needs to be changed/fixed in gas?
> Plus on the gcc side add a test for that once it is fixed in binutils?
I think this is a GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
Bug ID: 97586
Summary: "make check" failures in binutils with -flto=jobserver
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #3)
> The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48722d158cbf692c24025e345ec570f66aa5
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95151
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98446
Bug ID: 98446
Summary: C++ modules test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98482
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|2021-01-04 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
Bug ID: 98068
Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2
-flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
(internal compiler error) by r11-3303
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
Bug ID: 97936
Summary: [11 Regression] 30_threads/latch/3.cc hangs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Also:
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_integral/wait_notify.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > > > Can you please H.J.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98112
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The issue here is that what should happen when definitions marked with used
attribute and unmarked definitions are put in the same section. It has nothing
to do with .retain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 98162, which changed state.
Bug 98162 Summary: Documentation mentions non-existent option -mcet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] Incorrect |[11 Regression] Incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
Bug ID: 98172
Summary: Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD
processors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
GCC 11 will be system GCC 2 years from now. The current processors in 2020
will be 2 years old.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> I can't reproduce it anymore.
For r11-5820,
[hjl@gnu-clx-1 gcc]$ cat 1.c
int b;
double c, d;
void fn1() {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < b; i++)
c += i;
}
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Hmm, but rep movsb is only fast starting with Zen3 IIRC.
Are MOVSL/MOVSQ faster than MOVSB on Zen1/Zen2?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49675=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
Bug ID: 98128
Summary: [11 Regression] Bootstrap failed on 32-bit hosts
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ cat x.c
struct dtv_slotinfo_list
{
struct dtv_slotinfo_list *next;
};
extern struct dtv_slotinfo_list *list;
static int __attribute__ ((section ("__libc_freeres_fn")))
free_slotinfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #2)
> #define HAVE_GAS_SECTION_LINK_ORDER 1
Please show the command line options passed to ld, pass --dependency-file=FILE
to ld to list all linker input files and upload all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Also affecting Linux kernel build:
In file included from ./include/trace/define_trace.h:102,
from ./include/trace/events/tlb.h:62,
from arch/x86/mm/init.c:35:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959
Bug ID: 97959
Summary: Random FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps
c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.l at somniumtech dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49725=edit
An alternate patch
This patch may generate better debug info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49723=edit
A patch
Hongtao, can you take it over?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Created attachment 49723 [details]
> > A patch
> >
> > Hongtao, can you take it over?
>
> I'll validate it.
Please verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49723|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49724|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
Bug ID: 98110
Summary: [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by
r11-5029
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Something like, -fneed-frame-pointer, -fforce-frame-pointer or
-fgenerate-frame-pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
-fforce-frame-pointer should disable
1. Tail call.
2. Inlining. Should inlining be totally disabled? Which inlining should be
disabled? What do do with static inline and extern inline?
3. Frame pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Since gold has been fixed now, you can add a check for broken gold and set
HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN to 0 for broken gold.
1 - 100 of 1125 matches
Mail list logo