[Bug target/97148] Add

2020-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

2020-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

2020-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16B, aka CX16. But -mcx16 doesn't define __CX16__. > > It's called

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

2020-10-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > > > x86-64-v2 includes

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

2020-10-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is triggered by missing config/bootstrap-debug.mk. But cccS9GKD.s is is odd.

[Bug bootstrap/97451] New: [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

2020-10-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 Bug ID: 97451 Summary: [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

2020-10-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug target/97286] GCC sometimes uses an extra xmm register for the destination of _mm_blend_ps

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug target/97140] [10/11 Regression] ICE in error: unable to generate reloads for since r10-400-gecfdb16c54ad06ac

2020-10-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- The real updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554385.html

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

2020-10-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

2020-10-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In

[Bug c/97480] ice in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538

2020-10-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97480 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by r11-3998: commit 540d5f4f0215e1cdd2d4a2c89c65e46033298be0 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Oct 14 15:37:51 2020 +0200 Refactor vect_get_and_check_slp_defs some more This refactors

[Bug rtl-optimization/97482] Optimized (-O3) XMM register load incorrectly uses movdqu

2020-10-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97482 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/96827] [10/11 Regression] __m128i from _mm_set_epi32 is backwards with -O3

2020-10-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkkerrata at gmail dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

2020-10-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/97281] Mark -march=x86-64-v[234] binaries

2020-10-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/95483] [i386] Missing SIMD functions

2020-10-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95483 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/97473] Spilled function parameters not aligned properly on multiple non-x86 targets

2020-10-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97473 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nate Eldredge from comment #0) > > On x86_64-linux-gnu, gcc generates instructions to align the stack and place > the spilled copy of x at an aligned address, and the testcase passes there. >

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11.0|8.4.1 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed

[Bug middle-end/97054] [10/11 Regression] Runtime segfault with attached test code since r10-3559

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97054 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Resolution|---

[Bug target/97247] New: Typo in

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 Bug ID: 97247 Summary: Typo in Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Typo in |Typos in --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- The updated patch

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/97247] Typo in

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug target/97247] Typos in

2020-09-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/97184] Incorrect MOVDIRI and MOVDIR64B patterns

2020-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|11.0

[Bug target/97257] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/movdir64b.c (test for excess errors)

2020-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97257 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug target/97259] New: Incorrect ENQCMD and ENQCMDS patterns

2020-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97259 Bug ID: 97259 Summary: Incorrect ENQCMD and ENQCMDS patterns Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/97257] New: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/movdir64b.c (test for excess errors)

2020-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97257 Bug ID: 97257 Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/movdir64b.c (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 8.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/97259] Incorrect ENQCMD and ENQCMDS patterns

2020-10-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96827] [10/11 Regression] __m128i from _mm_set_epi32 is backwards with -O3

2020-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/97231] Missing FSF copyright notes for some x86 intrinsic headers

2020-09-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/97184] Incorrect MOVDIRI and MOVDIR64B patterns

2020-09-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/97281] New: Mark- march=x86-64-v[234] binaries

2020-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281 Bug ID: 97281 Summary: Mark- march=x86-64-v[234] binaries Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug other/97280] Documentation typo - 'roudnevenl'

2020-10-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97280 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/97032] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid use of register 'frame' since r8-1911

2020-09-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/97541] New: Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

2020-10-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 Bug ID: 97541 Summary: Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/97541] Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

2020-10-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/97541] Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

2020-10-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So isn't that yet another thing that needs to be changed/fixed in gas? > Plus on the gcc side add a test for that once it is fixed in binutils? I think this is a GCC

[Bug ada/97541] Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

2020-10-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Host||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ipa/97586] [11 Regression] "make check" failures in binutils with -flto since r11-3641-gc34db4b6f8a5d803

2020-10-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/97586] New: "make check" failures in binutils with -flto=jobserver

2020-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586 Bug ID: 97586 Summary: "make check" failures in binutils with -flto=jobserver Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/97567] [11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

2020-10-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #3) > The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48722d158cbf692c24025e345ec570f66aa5 > > commit

[Bug target/95151] [9/10/11 Regression] Add cmpmemM pattern for -minline-all-stringops

2020-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95151 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95458] Inline strncmp is *much* slower than glibc

2020-10-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

2020-10-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98446] New: C++ modules test failures

2020-12-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98446 Bug ID: 98446 Summary: C++ modules test failures Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/98482] -mfentry creates invalid call for -mcmodel=large

2021-01-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98482 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|2021-01-04 00:00:00

[Bug tree-optimization/98051] ICE in logical_combine, at gimple-range-gori.cc:754 in O2-Os

2020-11-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98051 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/97359] [11 Regression] ice in logical_combine, at gimple-range-gori.cc:754

2020-11-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug target/98027] CET support is documented to be explicitly enabled, however it's enabled by default

2020-11-27 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug lto/98068] New: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error) by r11-3303

2020-11-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068 Bug ID: 98068 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error) by r11-3303

[Bug libstdc++/97936] New: [11 Regression] 30_threads/latch/3.cc hangs

2020-11-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936 Bug ID: 97936 Summary: [11 Regression] 30_threads/latch/3.cc hangs Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/97936] [11 Regression] 30_threads/latch/3.cc hangs

2020-11-21 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Also: FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_integral/wait_notify.cc

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

2020-11-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > > > > Can you please H.J.

[Bug target/98112] Add -fdirect-access-external-data & drop HAVE_LD_PIE_COPYRELOC

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98112 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thiago at kde dot org See Also|

[Bug target/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- The issue here is that what should happen when definitions marked with used attribute and unmarked definitions are put in the same section. It has nothing to do with .retain.

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03 Component|target

[Bug target/81652] [meta-bug] -fcf-protection=full bugs

2020-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug 81652 depends on bug 98162, which changed state. Bug 98162 Summary: Documentation mentions non-existent option -mcet https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/98162] Documentation mentions non-existent option -mcet

2020-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug driver/98162] Documentation mentions non-existent option -mcet

2020-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/98161] [11 Regression] Incorrect stack realignment on __force_align_arg_pointer__ with -msse4 by r11-446

2020-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11 Regression] Incorrect |[11 Regression] Incorrect

[Bug target/98161] [11 Regression] Incorrect stack realignment on __force_align_arg_pointer__ with -msse4 by r11-446

2020-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Component|c

[Bug target/98161] [11 Regression] Incorrect stack realignment on __force_align_arg_pointer__ with -msse4 by r11-446

2020-12-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/98172] New: Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

2020-12-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172 Bug ID: 98172 Summary: Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/98172] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

2020-12-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- GCC 11 will be system GCC 2 years from now. The current processors in 2020 will be 2 years old.

[Bug rtl-optimization/94440] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r7-5324-gb8cab8a5492e9639

2020-12-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > I can't reproduce it anymore. For r11-5820, [hjl@gnu-clx-1 gcc]$ cat 1.c int b; double c, d; void fn1() { int i; for (i = 0; i < b; i++) c += i; } int

[Bug target/98172] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

2020-12-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/98172] Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD processors

2020-12-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Hmm, but rep movsb is only fast starting with Zen3 IIRC. Are MOVSL/MOVSQ faster than MOVSB on Zen1/Zen2?

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49675 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49675=edit A patch

[Bug bootstrap/98128] New: [11 Regression] Bootstrap failed on 32-bit hosts

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128 Bug ID: 98128 Summary: [11 Regression] Bootstrap failed on 32-bit hosts Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug testsuite/98125] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug bootstrap/98128] [11 Regression] Bootstrap failed on 32-bit hosts

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- [hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ cat x.c struct dtv_slotinfo_list { struct dtv_slotinfo_list *next; }; extern struct dtv_slotinfo_list *list; static int __attribute__ ((section ("__libc_freeres_fn"))) free_slotinfo

[Bug testsuite/98125] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/98125] New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess errors

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to seurer from comment #2) > #define HAVE_GAS_SECTION_LINK_ORDER 1 Please show the command line options passed to ld, pass --dependency-file=FILE to ld to list all linker input files and upload all

[Bug other/98121] __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply SHF_RETAIN_SECTION

2020-12-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug target/98146] [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used" attribute is applied to decl with specific section

2020-12-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Also affecting Linux kernel build: In file included from ./include/trace/define_trace.h:102, from ./include/trace/events/tlb.h:62, from arch/x86/mm/init.c:35:

[Bug lto/97959] New: Random FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

2020-11-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959 Bug ID: 97959 Summary: Random FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED See Also|

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jozef.l at somniumtech dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49725 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49725=edit An alternate patch This patch may generate better debug info.

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49723 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49723=edit A patch Hongtao, can you take it over?

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > > Created attachment 49723 [details] > > A patch > > > > Hongtao, can you take it over? > > I'll validate it. Please verify

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49723|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #49724|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/98219] User-interrupt return pop corrupt RIP

2020-12-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

2020-12-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] New: [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

2020-12-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 Bug ID: 98110 Summary: [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug tree-optimization/98110] [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by r11-5029

2020-12-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/97902] x86 frame pointer missing with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer)

2020-11-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98018] Option to force frame pointer

2020-11-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Something like, -fneed-frame-pointer, -fforce-frame-pointer or -fgenerate-frame-pointer.

[Bug target/98018] Option to force frame pointer

2020-11-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- -fforce-frame-pointer should disable 1. Tail call. 2. Inlining. Should inlining be totally disabled? Which inlining should be disabled? What do do with static inline and extern inline? 3. Frame pointer

[Bug target/98048] [11 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val, at tree.c:1985 by r11-5429

2020-11-28 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98048 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/98051] ICE in logical_combine, at gimple-range-gori.cc:754 in O2-Os

2020-11-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98051 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-29 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/97959] Random FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps

2020-12-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/93195] -fpatchable-function-entries : __patchable_function_entries should consider comdat groups

2020-12-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/98210] [11 Regression] SHF_GNU_RETAIN breaks gold linker generated binaries

2020-12-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Since gold has been fixed now, you can add a check for broken gold and set HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN to 0 for broken gold.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >