[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-11-10 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #27 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-10 20:21:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) Is this caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=180701 ? Maybe we need to remember if we

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-11-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #29 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25 15:08:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) (In reply to comment #27) (In reply to comment #26) Is this caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-11-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-11-26 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-11-26 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-26 16:46:08 UTC --- Created attachment 28779 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28779 Patch to use libbacktrace

[Bug libquadmath/55473] New: quadmath.h should have extern C for C++ users

2012-11-26 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55473 Bug #: 55473 Summary: quadmath.h should have extern C for C++ users Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-11-27 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-27 08:58:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Why are there no line numbers in the backtrace from gdb? You said you compiled with -g. Are you sure that libbacktrace

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-11-30 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 --- Comment #12 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-30 21:56:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) (In reply to comment #7) Why are there no line numbers in the backtrace from gdb? You said you compiled with -g

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-11-30 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 --- Comment #13 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-30 22:03:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #6) Created attachment 28779 [details] Patch to use libbacktrace I have to apply the following

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-12-01 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 --- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-01 19:48:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Thanks for the additional info. #1 0x77bb53be in build_address_map (addrs=0x7fffc710, data=0x7fffcf1c

[Bug fortran/52594] no traceback expected for explicit fortran stop command combined with -fbacktrace

2012-12-14 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52594 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-14 08:44:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I was just about to file a bugreport that STOP 1 should yield a backtrace if compiled with -fbacktrace that would really

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

2012-12-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

2012-12-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 16:47:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) Strangely enough I needed to add some epsilon to 0.5 so that the second test passes, because the exact

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

2012-12-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-25 22:11:21 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Tue Dec 25 22:11:16 2012 New Revision: 194717 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194717 Log: PR fortran/55539 Fix

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

2012-12-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/59108] ACTION='READ' is using O_CREAT

2013-11-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Fri Nov 15 22:00:36 2013 New Revision: 204864 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204864root=gccview=rev Log: When file status is unknown, don't set O_CREAT when

[Bug libfortran/59108] ACTION='READ' is using O_CREAT

2013-11-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59108 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/59419] [4.9 Regression] Failing OPEN with FILE='xxx' and IOSTAT creates the file 'xxx' after revision 196783

2013-12-13 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59419 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Indeed I suspect we have many cases in the IO library where stuff fails, leaks memory, or leaves stuff in an inconsistent state when IOSTAT= is present. I think that we should modify

[Bug fortran/54572] Use libbacktrace library

2012-09-16 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-16 08:33:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) You need unwind frames present for this to work, i.e. the space (and to some extent optimization-reducing - yes I'm sure) overhead

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work on Darwin

2013-02-18 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #46 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-18 20:16:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #44) If unformatted sequential ever worked, it was by chance. Look at this piece of code: /* Seek to the head

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unformatted sequential I/O with named pipes does not work

2013-02-19 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #50 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-19 10:59:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #47) Am 18.02.2013 21:16, schrieb jb at gcc dot gnu.org: Look at this piece of code: /* Seek to the head and overwrite

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unformatted sequential I/O with named pipes does not work

2013-02-19 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #51 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-19 22:48:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) Revision 180701 removed all checks for special files in unit.c:unit_truncate(). As a consequence programs compiled

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

2013-02-20 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-20 21:20:44 UTC --- Looking at the frontend, calls to runtime_error_at are generated from gfc_trans_runtime_check() and gfc_trans_runtime_error(). I went through calls

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unformatted sequential I/O with named pipes does not work

2013-02-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #52 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-21 19:03:19 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu Feb 21 19:03:10 2013 New Revision: 196210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196210 Log: Fix regression when

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unformatted sequential I/O with named pipes does not work

2013-02-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #53 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-21 20:13:12 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu Feb 21 20:13:04 2013 New Revision: 196212 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196212 Log: Fix regression when

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Unformatted sequential I/O with named pipes does not work

2013-02-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #54 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-21 20:39:58 UTC --- I'd suggest to close the unformatted sequential part of this PR as WONTFIX. Maybe it worked sometime in the past for small record sizes when buffered IO

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

2013-04-09 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

2013-04-11 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11 18:32:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The problem is that Cygwin does not support CLOCK_MONOTONIC; using it will return always return 0. Note that Cygwin

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

2013-04-12 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http

[Bug fortran/56981] Slow I/O: Unformatted 5x slower, large sys component; formatted slow as well

2013-04-17 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-17 10:50:07 UTC --- The reason why gfortran is slow here is that for non-regular files we use unbuffered I/O. If you write to a regular file instead of /dev/null, you'll see

[Bug fortran/56981] Slow I/O: Unformatted 5x slower, large sys component; formatted slow as well

2013-04-19 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56981 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

2013-04-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

2013-04-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

2013-04-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |http

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

2013-04-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-25 19:19:05 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu Apr 25 19:16:46 2013 New Revision: 198318 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198318root=gccview=rev Log: PR 57028 Bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

2013-04-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-25 19:19:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) Updated patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01517.html This one works

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

2013-04-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

2013-05-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-04-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-04-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-04-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27228|0 |1

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-04-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-24 21:44:06 UTC --- See also PR 36515

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-04-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25 06:11:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I respectfully disagree. The Fortran model is/was developed over many years with many knowledgeable people investing time

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-04-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25 21:15:57 UTC --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg01637.html

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

2012-05-05 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 --- Comment #12 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-05 07:59:28 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sat May 5 07:59:22 2012 New Revision: 187191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187191 Log: PR 49010,24518 MOD/MODULO fixes

[Bug fortran/24518] Intrinsic MOD incorrect for large arg1/arg2 and slow.

2012-05-05 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24518 --- Comment #25 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-05 07:59:30 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Sat May 5 07:59:22 2012 New Revision: 187191 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187191 Log: PR 49010,24518 MOD/MODULO fixes

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

2012-05-05 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53267] New: Constant fold BUILT_IN_FMOD

2012-05-07 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53267 Bug #: 53267 Summary: Constant fold BUILT_IN_FMOD Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-05-14 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-14 19:39:27 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Mon May 14 19:39:23 2012 New Revision: 187478 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187478 Log: PR 52428 Range checking when

[Bug fortran/52428] [RFC] I/O: READING of -huge()-1: Integer overflow

2012-05-14 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52428 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

2012-05-18 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-18 06:43:08 UTC --- AFAICS, this is an intentional change in behavior. When I proposed making backtracing enabled by default, there was some objections to the initial patch

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

2012-05-18 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-18 14:32:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) AFAICS, this is an intentional change in behavior. When I proposed making backtracing enabled by default

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-23 18:52:52 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Wed May 23 18:52:47 2012 New Revision: 187806 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187806 Log: PR 53456 clock_gettime fallback

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-05-24 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-24 20:19:46 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu May 24 20:19:37 2012 New Revision: 187846 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187846 Log: PR 53456 CPU timing fallback

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-06-04 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #10 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-04 19:13:54 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Mon Jun 4 19:13:49 2012 New Revision: 188201 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188201 Log: PR 53456 Fix typo in gf_cputime

[Bug fortran/53456] Add time support for VxWorks

2012-06-04 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53456 --- Comment #11 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-04 19:15:25 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Mon Jun 4 19:15:21 2012 New Revision: 188202 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188202 Log: PR 53456 Fix incorrect

[Bug fortran/52594] no traceback expected for explicit fortran stop command combined with -fbacktrace

2012-06-06 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52594 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/39654] ABI bug: FTELL intrinsic function not capable of large files

2012-06-20 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/39654] ABI bug: FTELL intrinsic function not capable of large files

2012-06-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-21 18:47:06 UTC --- Author: jb Date: Thu Jun 21 18:47:01 2012 New Revision: 188858 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188858 Log: PR 39654 FTELL intrinsic

[Bug fortran/39654] ABI bug: FTELL intrinsic function not capable of large files

2012-06-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39654 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/51119] MATMUL slow for large matrices

2012-06-28 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-28 12:15:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Janne, have you had a chance to look at this ? For larger matrices MATMMUL is really slow. Anything that includes even the most basic

[Bug fortran/53796] I/O INQUIRE of RECL: If not specified in OPEN, the default value should be returned (sequential access)

2012-06-30 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot

[Bug libfortran/30162] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-08-03 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #23 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-03 19:45:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) Revision 180701 removed all checks for special files in unit.c:unit_truncate(). Yes. As the email message introducing the patch

[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large

2013-06-22 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |REOPENED

[Bug libfortran/60324] Handle arbitrarily long path names

2014-07-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Rich Townsend from comment #6) This change introduces a dependency on strndup -- which, alas, is absent from libSystem in OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard), although later

[Bug fortran/61847] bug in gfortran runtime: digits cut off when reading floating point number

2014-08-19 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

2014-08-22 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3) Not having a copyright assignment won't interfere with this patch being applied. I'm waiting for confirmation from Janne that I can revert

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

2014-08-29 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Fri Aug 29 20:46:15 2014 New Revision: 214742 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214742root=gccview=rev Log: PR 62215 Reinstate unlinking old module file before

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

2014-08-29 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Fri Aug 29 20:49:16 2014 New Revision: 214743 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214743root=gccview=rev Log: PR 62215 Unlink old module file before renaming. 2014

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

2014-08-29 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/62768] New: Handling of file names with embedded nulls

2014-09-02 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jb at gcc dot gnu.org libgfortran uses various C/POSIX functions for interfacing with the file systems. In the C/POSIX world, file names are terminated by a null byte, whereas Fortran strings are not. Consider

[Bug libfortran/62768] Handling of file names with embedded nulls

2014-09-16 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62768 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Tue Sep 16 21:40:28 2014 New Revision: 215307 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215307root=gccview=rev Log: PR libfortran/62768 Handle filenames with embedded null

[Bug libfortran/62768] Handling of file names with embedded nulls

2014-09-17 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62768 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Wed Sep 17 21:44:15 2014 New Revision: 215338 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215338root=gccview=rev Log: PR libfortran/62768 Use gfc_unit.filename also when

[Bug libfortran/63471] [5.0 Regression] unix.c:1906:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'ttyname_r'

2014-10-08 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471 --- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, any idea how to fix it? Apparently just defining _REENTRANT globally might not be a good idea, as some systems may require linking in some other C library (libc_rt

[Bug libfortran/63471] [5.0 Regression] unix.c:1906:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'ttyname_r'

2014-10-08 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, maybe add something like AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE([ttyname_r]) to configure.ac and then in unix.c(stream_ttyname) check with #ifdef HAVE_TTYNAME_R HAVE_DECL_TTYNAME_R

[Bug libfortran/63471] [5.0 Regression] unix.c:1906:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'ttyname_r'

2014-10-08 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ah, I suspected that other functions might be affected as well. Thanks for finding them. That being said, googling this issue I stumbled upon https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011

[Bug libfortran/63471] [5.0 Regression] unix.c:1906:10: error: implicit declaration of function 'ttyname_r'

2014-10-10 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471 --- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3) On some platforms (MacOS 10.4 and Solaris 11), ttyname_r may return a 'char *', not 'int'. FWIW, libgfortran uses

[Bug libfortran/60324] New: Handle arbitrarily long path names

2014-02-23 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jb at gcc dot gnu.org libgfortran uses (stack allocated) arrays of size PATH_MAX or smaller in many places, when creating a temporary path name with a trailing NULL from a Fortran string. However, it's possible for the user

[Bug libfortran/48587] Avoid exhausting unit number with NEWUNIT=

2014-03-03 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc

[Bug fortran/60646] New: Investigate improved complex division algorithms

2014-03-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jb at gcc dot gnu.org The paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4539 analyzes several algorithms for complex division. Currently GFortran IIRC uses the Smith (1962) algorithm. We should investigate whether GFortran could

[Bug middle-end/60646] Investigate improved complex division algorithms

2014-03-28 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |middle-end

[Bug libfortran/60324] Handle arbitrarily long path names

2014-04-30 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libfortran/61035] New: Crash in getcwd intrinsic due to stack overflow

2014-05-02 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jb at gcc dot gnu.org The example program below crashes (my stack size limit is 8 MiB). program getcwd_overflow implicit none character(len=10485760) :: str ! 10 MiB call getcwd(str) print *, trim(str) end

[Bug libfortran/61035] Crash in getcwd intrinsic due to stack overflow

2014-05-02 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61035 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc

[Bug libfortran/61035] Crash in getcwd intrinsic due to stack overflow

2014-05-03 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61035 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

2014-05-03 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 --- Comment #8 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Sat May 3 20:56:26 2014 New Revision: 210041 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210041root=gccview=rev Log: PR 56919 Check _POSIX_MONOTONIC_CLOCK. 2014-05-03 Janne

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

2014-05-03 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 --- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Sat May 3 21:03:10 2014 New Revision: 210042 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210042root=gccview=rev Log: PR 56919 Check _POSIX_MONOTONIC_CLOCK. 2014-05-04 Janne

[Bug fortran/56919] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Wrong result for SYSTEM_CLOCK on Cygwin

2014-05-03 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/61035] Crash in getcwd intrinsic due to stack overflow

2014-05-12 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61035 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Mon May 12 19:23:11 2014 New Revision: 210335 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210335root=gccview=rev Log: Fix stack overflow crash in getcwd intrinsic. 2014-05-12

[Bug libfortran/61035] Crash in getcwd intrinsic due to stack overflow

2014-05-13 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61035 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libfortran/61187] New: valgrind errors if stdin is closed

2014-05-14 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jb at gcc dot gnu.org In some cases STDIN_FILENO (0 in POSIX) can be closed. This happens e.g. for rank != 0 MPI processes with MPICH2. This results in valgrind complaining about uninitialized variables. Test program

[Bug libfortran/61187] valgrind errors if stdin is closed

2014-05-16 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187 --- Comment #1 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Fri May 16 20:37:13 2014 New Revision: 210527 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210527root=gccview=rev Log: PR 61187 Fix use of uninitialized memory. 2014-05-16

[Bug libfortran/61187] valgrind errors if stdin is closed

2014-05-16 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Fri May 16 20:42:56 2014 New Revision: 210529 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210529root=gccview=rev Log: PR 61187 Fix use of uninitialized data. 2014-05-16

[Bug libfortran/61187] valgrind errors if stdin is closed

2014-05-16 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Fri May 16 20:48:17 2014 New Revision: 210530 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210530root=gccview=rev Log: PR 61187 Fix use of uninitialized data. 2014-05-16

[Bug libfortran/60324] Handle arbitrarily long path names

2014-05-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Thu May 22 03:51:25 2014 New Revision: 210738 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210738root=gccview=rev Log: PR 60324 Handle long path names, don't use PATH_MAX

[Bug libfortran/60324] Handle arbitrarily long path names

2014-05-22 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Thu May 22 21:17:29 2014 New Revision: 210827 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210827root=gccview=rev Log: PR 60324 Handle long path names, don't use PATH_MAX

[Bug libfortran/61187] valgrind errors if stdin is closed

2014-05-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jb Date: Sun May 25 19:29:00 2014 New Revision: 210914 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210914root=gccview=rev Log: PR 61187 Avoid reading uninitialized memory. 2014-05-25

[Bug libfortran/61187] valgrind errors if stdin is closed

2014-05-25 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61187 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >