[Bug fortran/29441] New: mathematical functions and constant expressions

2006-10-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29441

[Bug fortran/20257] New: Fortran runtime error: End of record occurs when writing large arrays

2005-02-28 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20257

[Bug fortran/20436] New: usring nested reshape functions gives runtime error

2005-03-11 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20436

[Bug fortran/21459] New: Fortran runtime error: Unexpected end of format string

2005-05-08 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
: kamaraju at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21459

[Bug fortran/21480] New: trivial reshape operation gives erroneous results

2005-05-09 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
operation gives erroneous results Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/23889] New: non intuitive behaviour of gfortran

2005-09-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23889

[Bug libfortran/23889] non intuitive behaviour of gfortran

2005-09-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From kamaraju at gmail dot com 2005-09-15 02:11 --- Subject: Re: non intuitive behaviour of gfortran On 15 Sep 2005 00:15:27 -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09

[Bug fortran/24369] New: segmentation fault with gfortran

2005-10-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
: segmentation fault with gfortran Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http

[Bug c/54363] New: ICE when compiling malformed struct initializers

2012-08-23 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54363 Bug #: 54363 Summary: ICE when compiling malformed struct initializers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/38853] New: internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107

2009-01-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853

[Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107

2009-01-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-14 22:14 --- Created an attachment (id=17105) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17105action=view) code to reproduce the internal compiler error -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853

[Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107

2009-01-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-15 06:21 --- Joost, Did you test on the solaris machine or on the i386 machine. I think this is a architecture specific bug. Could you please confirm the architecture of your machine? thanks raju -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/38981] New: internal compiler error

2009-01-26 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981

[Bug c/38981] internal compiler error

2009-01-26 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:00 --- Created an attachment (id=17187) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17187action=view) code to reproduce the internal compiler error -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981

[Bug middle-end/38981] internal compiler error

2009-01-26 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:05 --- Created an attachment (id=17188) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17188action=view) preprocessed source code produced by using gcc -E ice.c ice.c.ppd -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug bootstrap/38981] internal compiler error

2009-01-26 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:14 --- My initial guess was that it is a bug in yacc. But now I do not think so. I have compiled bison (which supersedes yacc). I still see this bug with bison (and no yacc). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug bootstrap/38981] internal compiler error

2009-01-26 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 01:20 --- Is there anyway to figure out if my gcc is still using yacc and not bison? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981

[Bug bootstrap/38981] internal compiler error

2009-01-26 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 02:00 --- I can't believe I am so dense... I installed bison, removed /usr/ccs/bin from the PATH. But I forgot to recompile gcc with the new update. I was still trying to bootstrap from the old compiler. Let me recompile gcc

[Bug bootstrap/38981] internal compiler error

2009-01-27 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-01-27 13:51 --- I would like to confirm that, even after recompiling gcc with bison, I am still getting the internal compiler error. There is no yacc, no /usr/ccs/bin in $PATH when gcc was compiled. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug bootstrap/38981] internal compiler error

2009-02-06 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-06 21:26 --- Created an attachment (id=17263) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17263action=view) reduced program which reproduces the ICE Attaching a reduced test case which reproduces the same error. gcc -c

[Bug bootstrap/38981] internal compiler error

2009-02-06 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-06 21:28 --- Created an attachment (id=17264) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17264action=view) preprocessed source code of ice3.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38981

[Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107

2009-02-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-12 23:59 --- For those reading the archives, this problem is specific to Solaris 8. The backtrace from this ICE (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00321.html) is similar to another problem I encountered with a C program

[Bug fortran/38853] internal compiler error with gfortran 4.4-20081107

2009-02-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2009-02-13 04:53 --- So, can we close this PR as fixed? I thought it was marked as fixed long time back (2009-01-15) by Joost. Anyway, the answer is yes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38853

[Bug bootstrap/38088] New: gcc fails to compile with undefined symbol: __LONG_LONG_MAX__ error

2008-11-11 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38088

[Bug bootstrap/38088] gcc fails to compile with undefined symbol: __LONG_LONG_MAX__ error

2008-11-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-12 13:49 --- Andrew (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2008-11/msg00131.html) suggested to use #define CAP_INFINITY INTTYPE_MAXIMUM(HOST_WIDEST_INT) I tried it out. The mcf.c compiles with this modification. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/38088] gcc fails to compile with undefined symbol: __LONG_LONG_MAX__ error

2008-11-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 00:02 --- I confirm that using this patch, mcf.c compiles cleanly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38088

[Bug bootstrap/38100] New: gcc fails to compile with (undefined symbol) gimple_check_failed error

2008-11-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38100

[Bug bootstrap/38106] gcc fails to compile with ld:libgcc.map: file format not recognized error

2008-11-13 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 20:40 --- Created an attachment (id=16664) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16664action=view) output generated when configure script is run -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38106

[Bug bootstrap/38106] gcc fails to compile with ld:libgcc.map: file format not recognized error

2008-11-13 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 20:42 --- Created an attachment (id=16665) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16665action=view) output generated when make is run -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38106

[Bug bootstrap/38106] New: gcc fails to compile with ld:libgcc.map: file format not recognized error

2008-11-13 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38106

[Bug bootstrap/38106] gcc fails to compile with ld:libgcc.map: file format not recognized error

2008-11-13 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 21:44 --- I was just using nohup ../../unZipped/gcc-4.4-20081107/configure --prefix=/home/kkusuman/software/myroot/gcc-4.4-20081107 21 configure.log I will try giving the --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld options and see what

[Bug bootstrap/38106] gcc fails to compile with ld:libgcc.map: file format not recognized error

2008-11-13 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-13 22:29 --- Changing the configure command to nohup ../../unZipped/gcc-4.4-20081107/configure --prefix=/home/kkusuman/software/myroot/gcc-4.4-20081107 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld 21 configure.log fixed the problem. Thanks raju

[Bug c++/38124] New: gcc fails to compile with Internal error, aborting at dw2gencfi.c line 1267 errror

2008-11-14 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38124

[Bug c++/38124] gcc fails to compile with Internal error, aborting at dw2gencfi.c line 1267 errror

2008-11-18 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2008-11-18 14:28 --- I filed this bug against binutils as http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7032 . The conclusion there is that it is a compiler bug (since the abort is an unhandled case in a switch). Could some one take

[Bug fortran/45724] New: segmentation fault occurs when printing string if -malign-double option is used

2010-09-18 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45724

[Bug fortran/45724] segmentation fault occurs when printing string if -malign-double option is used

2010-09-18 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 20:29 --- @Uros Bizjak I dont understand your point in copy pasting the manual on -malign-double. Are you saying that segmentation fault is an acceptable/expected behavior in this case and this bug will not be fixed

[Bug fortran/45724] segmentation fault occurs when printing string if -malign-double option is used

2010-09-18 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-18 22:26 --- Ok. Thanks for the explanation. I appreciate it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45724

[Bug c++/45651] New: internal compiler error: in import_export_decl, at cp/decl2.c:2344

2010-09-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kamaraju at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug tree-optimization/40150] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 with -combine

2010-09-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-12 12:51 --- When I tried with 4.6.0 20100828, I get the ICE at a different place. /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -O3 -fwhole-program -combine lv2log.i sim-common.i flight-computer.i physics.i pressure_sensor.i sensors.i

[Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188

2010-09-12 Thread kamaraju at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-12 13:39 --- The reduced test case in comment #8, with options -c -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time, does not ICE in gcc 4.4.5 20100909, gcc 4.6.0 20100828. But it gives an ICE with gcc 4.3.5. Also, for sched.i, with options -c -Os -fno-unit