https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
Bug ID: 97313
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at
lra.c:1004 since r11-937-g5261cf8ce824bfc7
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-07
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97315
Bug ID: 97315
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in choose_value, at
gimple-ssa-evrp.c:282 since
r11-3690-gebc77ce3a4c70730b4e38d68f88693eadbdc8712
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97315
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97290
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on master with g:190c04ba36d9c6c3dce41f12012aa97c6d7f22f5
commit 190c04ba36d9c6c3dce41f12012aa97c6d7f22f5
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon Oct 5 18:03:08 2020 +0200
lto: fix LTO debug sections
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89233
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 88082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88082
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Any progress on this. Are you planning Jakub to suggest the patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64636
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Bug ID: 97269
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in change_address_1, at
emit-rtl.c:2275 since
r11-3427-ge94797250b403d66cb3624a594e41faf0dd76617
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.2.0
Summary|[11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97270
Bug ID: 97270
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247
since r11-1445-g502d63b6d61415
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a hackish patch that tries to resolve that.
Basically, linear iteration of globals is very slow and a better data structure
should be used (I used sorted list), so each lookup is at least O(log N).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97270
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49299
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49299=edit
Hackish patch candidate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96979
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97268
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Started with Nathan's commit.
r11-1763-g27aebb7d6cf14175
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97229
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49298=edit
Reduced test-case
There's reduced test-case:
$ gcc pointer-cmp.c -fsanitize=address,pointer-compare &&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] .gcno |[9/10 Regression] .gcno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97193
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-07
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97319
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> Pehraps it would be more useful to add debug counter to the place
> disambiguation is done (where we dump ipa-modref: in tree-ssa-alias.
> That way we would have both the summary and the access.
Please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97290
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, I've just installed the patch with the debug counter.
I can reproduce it with first bad value with --param=lto-partitions=1:
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:16848
and the difference comes from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
Bug ID: 97335
Summary: [11 Regression] 525.x264_r fails with -Ofast -g
-march=znver2 -flto=16 since
r11-3641-gc34db4b6f8a5d803
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #0)
> With just -Ofast the benchmark doesn't seem to ever terminate until it is
> eventually killed.
>
Can't reproduce the stuck without -flto.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
One needs -flto here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97330
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97324
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
With -O3 -g -flto=16 --param=lto-partitions=1, the first bad binary is with
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:1046.
It seems a misc tool fails with:
./ldecod_r -i BuckBunny.264 -o BuckBunny.yuv
Setting Default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49330
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49330=edit
Bad PRE dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49329
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49329=edit
Good PRE dump file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97335
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
With the current master (g:3e1123e52f8eca2650efa0bc81768792d328961f) one needs
only one IPA modref transform to trigger the wrong code:
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:778-778
where one needs to copy the input file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Good PRE dump file with details:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/114AAhbNKeiJ7w3FYOcumdpnnMCNvdjiy/view?usp=sharing
Bad PRE dump file with details:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90439
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
I was able to find a minimal debug counter for IPA modref that triggers that:
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:10902-10904
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #17)
> And is it again the operator++ triggering the problem?
> It looks like aliasing bug to me, but in a template hell and
> -Wstrict-aliasing=3 is happy.
It's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97295
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Sergei for the nice test-case.
It started with r8-4715-g35cd23ebb6d05e13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97319
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #8)
> Note that the error reported in comment #1 is on x86_64-linux.
So please provide one more test-case which can be reproduced on
x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-15
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97416
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vvinayag at arm dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97447
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97415
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Fixed on trunk so far. I'm undecided whether it needs to be backported.
> Although the comparison with null is formally unspecified, I think all the
> compilers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
> Yes, it works. I've been using it for some time in out gcc11 package.
PING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97292
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49314
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49314=edit
Debug counter patch
First bad debug counter value is -fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:2793.
Difference is for:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97294
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97284
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97375
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97356
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97355
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97372
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Segmentation fault using|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97377
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97357
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97378
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97378
Bug ID: 97378
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tree check: expected class
‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Thank you Vladimir for the fix.
Can we close it now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97079
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96263
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on master with r11-2577-g229752afe3156a39.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Can be reproduced with the current master
(g:91d80cf4bd2827dd9c40fe6a7c719c909d79083d).
One needs to following patch to work-around a different PR95582:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97079
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97079
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
So it really started with g:ada353b87909fd6cd37a30083b4fdcb76acbf5fe.
I'm going to re-check the current master.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97379
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-12
Summary|[11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97079
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #3)
> It seems this was introduced with
> r11-2817-gcdb2e365fc0dba2ee052827e5ca65234ca82d605:
>
> commit cdb2e365fc0dba2ee052827e5ca65234ca82d605
> Author: Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97379
Bug ID: 97379
Summary: [11 Regression] Invalid read of size 8 at
outgoing_range::calc_switch_ranges(gswitch*)
(gimple-range-edge.cc:140)
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97389
Bug ID: 97389
Summary: [11 Regression] Segfault in tramp3d since
r11-3825-g71dbabccbfb295c8
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97389
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97395
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96879
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
@Jakub: PING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
And it's still present after latest Honza's patches as of
g:ca4938fa8e0e72fd59307f1f058db800c1e4a8f3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97350
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> > Interesting, i get different ICE
> > during GIMPLE pass: slp
> > ../../gcc/ada/libgnat/s-os_lib.adb: In function
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97404
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97456
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
A bit reduced test-case:
$ #include
auto wrong(float ) -> int {
auto a = std::complex(pos, pos);
auto b = std::complex(0.0f, 0.0f);
b = b + a;
if (b == 0.0f)
return 1;
printf("%f\n",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at milianw dot de
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97416
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 5132 matches
Mail list logo