Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
--- Comment #1 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-08 18:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=18994)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18994&action=view)
the dhrystone benchmark
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
--- Comment #4 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-08 19:52 ---
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 5
model : 10
model name : Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by AMD PCS
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 498.060
--- Comment #6 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-08 22:34 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re: Code optimized for AMD Geode is slower than generic
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:52 AM, "rootkit85 at
--- Comment #8 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-09 08:55 ---
1) define "real geode"
2) what CPU do I have?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
--- Comment #9 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-09 09:01 ---
Read here pag. 15:
http://www.amd.com/files/connectivitysolutions/geode/geode_lx/33234F_LX_databook.pdf
"The instruction set supported by the core is a combination
of Intel Pentium® processor, AMD Athlon™ processor
--- Comment #16 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-09 13:17 ---
Yes, it seems that even old Geode has such instructions:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : Geode by NSC
cpu family : 5
model : 9
model name : Unknown
stepping: 1
cpu
--- Comment #18 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-09 15:26 ---
As I did here?
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/51410/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
--- Comment #20 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-09 20:25 ---
Yes K6 is the best fallback for geode-lx, while pentium-mmx is the best one for
geode.
I need to know if this new -march argument will be added so I edit the kernel
patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #21 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-09 21:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=19001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19001&action=view)
A patch which adds Geode LX support to GCC
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
--- Comment #23 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2009-11-16 10:02 ---
Despite its name Geode GX, LX and NX are very different, I guess that we should
split them to geode-gx and geode-lx, and alias geode-nx to k7
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48546
Summary: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48546
--- Comment #2 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
2011-04-11 13:48:52 UTC ---
I'll try when Linaro will switch to 4.6 then
--- Comment #25 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2010-08-22 13:34 ---
try -march=i686 it should be the best
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
--- Comment #27 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2010-08-31 18:02 ---
you could try but i'm not sure that NOPL is mandatory for the i686 arch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41989
//gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
--- Comment #1 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
2010-11-18 11:25:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 22442
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22442
the preprocessed source file
||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
2010-11-18 12:52:31 UTC ---
duplicate of #45102
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45102 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
rootki...@yahoo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
--- Comment #1 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-05 21:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=14882)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14882&action=view)
the source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #2 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-05 21:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=14883)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14883&action=view)
the source compiled with -mfpmath=387
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #3 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-05 21:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=14884)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14884&action=view)
the source compiled with -mfpmath=sse
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
c dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #8 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-07 19:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=14895)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14895&action=view)
minimal testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #9 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-07 19:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=14896)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14896&action=view)
minimal testcase, compiled with -mfpmath=387
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #10 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-07 19:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=14897)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14897&action=view)
minimal testcase, compiled with -mfpmath=sse
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #11 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2008-01-07 19:49 ---
very very minimal testcase added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34682
--- Comment #2 from rootkit85 at yahoo dot it 2006-02-22 14:40 ---
I have broken RAM.
Sorry for complaining gcc
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26407
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
rootkit85 at yahoo dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
dot com
Reporter: rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38788
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38788&action=edit
workaround to compile go tool
the go tool fails to link.
configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71697
--- Comment #2 from Matteo Croce ---
I run Ubuntu 16.04, how can I check if --no-add-needed is default?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71697
--- Comment #4 from Matteo Croce ---
/home/matteo/src/openwrt/build_dir/toolchain-i386_pentium4_gcc-5.3.0_glibc-2.22/gcc-5.3.0-final/./gcc/collect-ld
-plugin
/home/matteo/src/openwrt/build_dir/toolchain-i386_pentium4_gcc-5.3.0_glibc-2.22/gcc-5.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71697
--- Comment #5 from Matteo Croce ---
$ x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wov
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rootkit85 at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
The following code:
#include
// build with: -O2 -Werror=format-truncation
void poke_kprobe_events(int add)
{
char cmd[192], probename[128], probefunc[128
33 matches
Mail list logo
