[Bug tree-optimization/80122] __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly

2017-03-24 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122 --- Comment #8 from rpirrera at aitek dot it --- OK we have applied the patch onto the 5.4.0 version of GCC and it is working correctly. Thank you for your support!

[Bug c/80122] New: __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly

2017-03-20 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rpirrera at aitek dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 41007 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41007=edit test __builtin_va_arg_p

[Bug c/80122] __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly

2017-03-21 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122 --- Comment #2 from rpirrera at aitek dot it --- There is no work around for this bug? Core parts of our code relied on __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() to work and now all silently fails.

[Bug tree-optimization/80122] __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly

2017-03-21 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122 --- Comment #6 from rpirrera at aitek dot it --- How this work now? We can expect a back port to versions 5.4 and 6.3 of this patch? Or this will exist only in the future version 7.x? Thank you!

[Bug middle-end/86505] [6/7/8/9 Regression] __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() computes the number of arguments wrongly

2018-07-16 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505 --- Comment #2 from rpirrera at aitek dot it --- Any news on the fix?

[Bug middle-end/86505] [6/7 Regression] __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() computes the number of arguments wrongly

2018-09-04 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86505 --- Comment #9 from rpirrera at aitek dot it --- The patch cannot be applied to the compiler we are using (GCC 5), we get a function not defined error. Is it possible to have a patch for GCC 5 too? Thank you.

[Bug tree-optimization/80122] __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly

2018-07-11 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122 rpirrera at aitek dot it changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution

[Bug c/86505] New: __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() computes the number of arguments wrongly

2018-07-12 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rpirrera at aitek dot it Target Milestone: --- I have found another issue with __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() that happens when the functions that uses __builtin_va_arg_pack() calls

[Bug tree-optimization/80122] __builtin_va_arg_pack() and __builtin_va_arg_pack_len() does not work correctly

2018-07-12 Thread rpirrera at aitek dot it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122 --- Comment #14 from rpirrera at aitek dot it --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > Can you please open a new bugreport? Btw, your snippet doesn't compile > because you miss ANSI_BOLD and friends, removing it and adding a #i