--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 23:44 ---
Subject: Bug 26651
Author: rth
Date: Thu Apr 13 23:44:25 2006
New Revision: 112935
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112935
Log:
PR 26651
* gimple-low.c (lower_omp_d
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 16:53 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 20:58 ---
Subject: Bug 25865
Author: rth
Date: Tue Apr 25 20:58:25 2006
New Revision: 113256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113256
Log:
PR libgomp/25865
* configure.ac: Use GCC_C
--- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 21:03 ---
Fixed, or if not, moved the point of failure out of libgomp.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 15:11 ---
We went through three iterations of this on the branch.
The variable identification step cannot be done before gimplification,
because it requires that we also mark some variables that are created
by the gimplification
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 17:46 ---
Subject: Bug 27358
Author: rth
Date: Mon May 1 17:46:32 2006
New Revision: 113421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113421
Log:
PR c/27358
* c-
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 17:50 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-01 17:58 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> 1) if we prove the structured block has at least one barrier in between the
> firstprivate and lastprivate code chunks (doesn't matter if explicit #pragma
> omp barrier or some o
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-03 01:45 ---
omp_is_private is supposed to prevent extra PRIVATE clauses from being added
when they're not needed -- since each PRIVATE clause results in a new decl
being created.
I believe your patch is correct.
--
rth a
--- Comment #11 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 01:17 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I haven't looked into the rev. history, to see why/when this fix was made,
> but will ask the hypothetical: was this fix made to workaround the
> misbehavior in create_tmp_v
--- Comment #8 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-22 17:38 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] syncronization primitives cause ICE with
-march=pentium or better
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:40:33PM -, kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Posted a patch.
Patch ok.
--- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 15:00 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This isn't a target bug as far as I can tell. The value generated
> by __builtin_nanf("") as shown by Nan2.c is 0x7fc0. The same
> value is printed on x86.
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 15:17 ---
libgomp is a new feature, and therefore has no "regressions" per se,
and therefore any bug fix applies. The problem report from llnl can
be legitimately considered a bug.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 15:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28008
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jun 14 15:20:01 2006
New Revision: 114643
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114643
Log:
PR libgomp/28008
* env.c (initialize_env
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-14 15:20 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #17 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 20:09 ---
Seems to be bad interactions with the fix for PR26347.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 27082
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jun 21 18:31:56 2006
New Revision: 114861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114861
Log:
PR target/26347
PR target/27082
--- Comment #9 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 26347
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jun 21 18:31:56 2006
New Revision: 114861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114861
Log:
PR target/26347
PR target/27082
--- Comment #10 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 19:06 ---
Subject: Bug 26347
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jun 21 19:06:49 2006
New Revision: 114862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114862
Log:
PR target/26347
PR target/27082
--- Comment #20 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 19:06 ---
Subject: Bug 27082
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jun 21 19:06:49 2006
New Revision: 114862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114862
Log:
PR target/26347
PR target/27082
--- Comment #21 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 19:09 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-21 19:10 ---
Fixed. Again.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #19 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 17:11 ---
Testing patch.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: i386-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38240
--- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-23 18:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=16752)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16752&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38240
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 17:14 ---
Subject: Bug 38240
Author: rth
Date: Mon Dec 8 17:12:55 2008
New Revision: 142556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142556
Log:
PR 38240
* tree.h (TYPE_MODE)
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 19:51 ---
Laurent, I don't seem to be able to reproduce your PA problem
from a cross-compile. Please attach a preprocessed file that
exhibits the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40347
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 20:04 ---
Likewise, Andrew, I'll need a preprocessed file.
Assuming something that doesn't show up w/ stage1 can even
be reproduced via cross-compiler. Failing that, give me as
much information as you can about h
--- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 23:28 ---
Subject: Bug 40488
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jun 18 23:27:40 2009
New Revision: 148685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=148685
Log:
PR 40488
* tree-pass.h (TDF_ASMNA
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 23:35 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 01:06 ---
Hmph. Buggy tests.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 01:13 ---
Subject: Bug 40565
Author: rth
Date: Sat Jun 27 01:13:11 2009
New Revision: 149002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149002
Log:
PR testsuite/40565
* gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp:
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 14:56 ---
You're right, it's my bug.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #9 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 20:42 ---
Mine.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
--- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 23:16 ---
Subject: Bug 40431
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jul 1 23:16:06 2009
New Revision: 149157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149157
Log:
PR debug/40431
* dwarf2out.c (def_cfa_1)
--- Comment #10 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 23:21 ---
Subject: Bug 40347
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jul 1 23:21:17 2009
New Revision: 149158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149158
Log:
PR bootstrap/40347
* fu
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 23:32 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 23:33 ---
Tested the fix for sparc; re-open if it's not fixed for darwin too.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 18:05 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 40462 ***
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 18:05 ---
*** Bug 40620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40462
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 23:38 ---
I'll go farther than that and say that all single-precision fp numbers
destined for integer registers should be passed through the normal
constant splitting routines.
For instance, all positive powers of two sa
--- Comment #16 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 16:41 ---
Subject: Bug 38900
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:41:23 2009
New Revision: 149373
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149373
Log:
PR target/38900
* config/i38
--- Comment #17 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 16:59 ---
Subject: Bug 38900
Author: rth
Date: Wed Jul 8 16:59:15 2009
New Revision: 149374
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149374
Log:
PR target/38900
* config/i38
--- Comment #18 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-08 17:03 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 17:55 ---
I believe a "proper" way to handle this, preserving the semantics that
the linker provides, is to transform this into
union {
double _1;
int _2;
} i;
and replace occurrences with i._1, i._2, etc.
Perh
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-29 18:10 ---
So LTO still produces N output object files for N input files?
Cause you can't just output
.comm i,4,4
.comm i,8,8
in one object file, and I didn't see any changes to varasm.c...
--
http://g
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 00:55 ---
Subject: Bug 24612
Author: rth
Date: Sun Nov 6 00:55:43 2005
New Revision: 106551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106551
Log:
PR middle-end/24612
* o
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 00:56 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-06 23:40 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg00326.html
In short, you'll never get a completely unified way to implement these
routines.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-07 08:48 ---
I stand by my statement. This cannot go in libgcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24692
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 22:41 ---
Subject: Bug 24703
Author: rth
Date: Tue Nov 8 22:40:55 2005
New Revision: 106662
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106662
Log:
PR 24703
* omp-low.c (determine_paral
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 22:43 ---
Band-aid applied. I'll work on a better solution later.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24703
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 01:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Do you think there are enough people with prehistoric libcs building
> new GCC to bother with it though?
If someone wanted to do the work in the .exp files, I wouldn't be opposed.
--- Comment #24 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 16:47 ---
We tried that. You get suckier optimization that way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:23 ---
Subject: Bug 24621
Author: rth
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:23:23 2005
New Revision: 107093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107093
Log:
PR rtl-opt/24160
PR target/24621
* r
--- Comment #14 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:23 ---
Subject: Bug 24160
Author: rth
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:23:23 2005
New Revision: 107093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107093
Log:
PR rtl-opt/24160
PR target/24621
*
--- Comment #15 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:27 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 17:28 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #30 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 18:56 ---
Clearly the only way to stop getting mail in this thread is to fix it.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #36 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 23:43 ---
Subject: Bug 23497
Author: rth
Date: Wed Nov 16 23:43:39 2005
New Revision: 107107
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107107
Log:
PR middle-end/23497
* tr
--- Comment #37 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 23:47 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 05:39 ---
Subject: Bug 24845
Author: rth
Date: Fri Nov 18 05:39:12 2005
New Revision: 107159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107159
Log:
PR 24845
gcc/
* gcc.c (link_gomp_sp
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 05:42 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 23:32 ---
Alex's explanation can't be all of it. I hacked the compiler to emit two
"mf" instructions before and after the sequence here, and it made no
difference to the two tests failing. I really have no
--- Comment #18 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 00:56 ---
Dammit, lemme try again; I patched a different tree than I tested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24757
--- Comment #23 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 02:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=10289)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10289&action=view)
mf hack
For the record, here's the aforementioned hack.
And it does appear to change the behaviour o
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 05:37 ---
Subject: Bug 24665
Author: rth
Date: Sun Nov 20 05:37:08 2005
New Revision: 107244
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107244
Log:
PR tree-opt/24665
* tree-gimple.c (is_g
--- Comment #32 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 05:43 ---
Oh good grief. I can't see the forest for the trees. Andreas, I expect
that patch will work. If it tests ok, please commit it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24757
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 19:04 ---
Subject: Bug 24665
Author: rth
Date: Sun Nov 20 19:03:53 2005
New Revision: 107259
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107259
Log:
PR tree-opt/24665
* tree-gimple.c (is_g
--- Comment #8 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 19:05 ---
Subject: Bug 24665
Author: rth
Date: Sun Nov 20 19:05:43 2005
New Revision: 107260
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107260
Log:
PR tree-opt/24665
* tree-gimple.c (is_g
--- Comment #9 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 19:06 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-20 19:32 ---
Patch is approved.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24930
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 00:51 ---
Subject: Bug 24931
Author: rth
Date: Mon Nov 21 00:51:39 2005
New Revision: 107271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107271
Log:
PR 24931
* tree-sra.c (struct sra_e
--- Comment #4 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 00:56 ---
Subject: Bug 24931
Author: rth
Date: Mon Nov 21 00:55:57 2005
New Revision: 107272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107272
Log:
PR 24931
* tree-sra.c (struct sra_e
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 22:38 ---
No, this isn't a failure of the demangler. Nor do ever expect these
functions to ever be demangled. That they contain the original function
name at all is merely an aid to us the compiler developer.
I don'
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 23:07 ---
Fixing the unwinder to handle epilogues is harder than you think, I think.
My guess is that it'll require completely rewriting the unwind generator.
It'll need to be CFG aware, which means it'll have to h
--- Comment #16 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 17:45 ---
Subject: Bug 22480
Author: rth
Date: Fri Dec 2 17:45:02 2005
New Revision: 107910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107910
Log:
2005-09-14 Uros Bizjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-05 19:01 ---
Andrew, why don't you restrict yourself to marking duplicates things
that are actually duplicates. The ffmpeg example in PR11203 really
uses too many inputs. This one doesn't.
--
rth at gcc dot g
--- Comment #9 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 18:21 ---
Indeed we shouldn't be mis-aligning the stack pointer. And if you look at
the actual assembly, we aren't. Therefore the problem is bogus debug info.
I had been looking at this PR for a while, but got sidet
--- Comment #12 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-08 19:12 ---
This patch is ok.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25023
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 17:40 ---
Subject: Bug 25240
Author: rth
Date: Tue Dec 20 17:40:17 2005
New Revision: 108859
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108859
Log:
PR preprocessor/25240
* directives.c (run_d
--- Comment #3 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-20 18:00 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #20 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 01:18 ---
Subject: Bug 27889
Author: rth
Date: Tue Jul 18 01:17:52 2006
New Revision: 115541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115541
Log:
PR 27889
* tree-nested.c (create_tmp_var_f
--- Comment #21 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 15:43 ---
Subject: Bug 27889
Author: rth
Date: Thu Jul 20 15:43:44 2006
New Revision: 115621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115621
Log:
PR 27889
* tree-nested.c (create_tmp_var_f
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 00:28 ---
The generic implementation, including for SSE, is
isgreater (abs(f), FLT_MAX)
For isfinite, use islessequal instead. For isnan, one can use
isunordered(f, f)
For isnormal, it'd be
isgreaterequal(
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 16:11 ---
Subject: Bug 29558
Author: rth
Date: Mon Feb 19 16:10:49 2007
New Revision: 122130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122130
Log:
PR debug/29558
* var-tracking.c (trac
--- Comment #8 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 29558
Author: rth
Date: Mon Feb 19 16:21:59 2007
New Revision: 122131
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122131
Log:
PR debug/29558
* var-tracking.c (trac
--- Comment #10 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 23:45 ---
Fixed.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 974 matches
Mail list logo
