[Bug fortran/55827] ICE with multiple fortran modules and character lenght determined by an interfaced pure function

2012-12-28 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-12-29 00:25:33 UTC --- On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:41:22PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827 Mikael

[Bug fortran/55827] ICE with multiple fortran modules and character lenght determined by an interfaced pure function

2012-12-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55827 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-12-29 16:04:45 UTC --- On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:02:43PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Index: class.c

[Bug fortran/51208] [OOP] ALLOCATE with SOURCE= or MOLD=: Diagnose if variable occurs twice

2013-01-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51208 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-01-07 23:36:50 UTC --- On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:16:13PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: (In reply to comment #2) Or extremely complicated

[Bug fortran/56081] Seg fault ICE on select with bad case

2013-01-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-01-23 04:28:01 UTC --- On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:27:11AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Index: match.c

[Bug fortran/56149] 64 bit gFortran-C interop hidden character argument length passed as 32 bit value

2013-01-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56149 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-01-31 15:54:56 UTC --- On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:58:27PM +, paul.laidler at ntlworld dot com wrote: --- Comment #2 from Paul Laidler paul.laidler

[Bug fortran/56149] 64 bit gFortran-C interop hidden character argument length passed as 32 bit value

2013-01-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56149 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-02-01 05:21:58 UTC --- On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:29:46PM +, paul.laidler at ntlworld dot com wrote: --- Comment #6 from Paul Laidler paul.laidler

[Bug fortran/58813] SIGSEGV in show_locus at error.c:310

2013-10-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:01:43PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Error: Procedure 'yS???+' in generic interface 't' at (1) is neither function nor subroutine

[Bug fortran/58813] SIGSEGV in show_locus at error.c:310

2013-10-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 06:40:22AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813 --- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:47:36PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #3 from Rodrigo Rodrigues

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:02:08PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #5 from Rodrigo Rodrigues

[Bug fortran/58913] Segmentation fault on real128 array

2013-10-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913 --- Comment #7 from Rodrigo Rodrigues

[Bug fortran/58975] Builtin function RAN() interferes with F77 program's own definition of INTEGER FUNCTION RAN()

2013-11-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58975 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 12:24:10AM +, arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58975 --- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer

[Bug bootstrap/58995] Use of -ldl in libcilkrts breaks bootstrap

2013-11-04 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58995 --- Comment #1 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:20:59AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: bsupc++/.libs -lpthread -ldl -L/home/sgk/gcc/obj4x/./gcc /home/sgk/gcc/obj4x/x86_64-unknown

[Bug fortran/58989] [Regression] internal compiler error when using reshape function

2013-11-04 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58989 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 09:40:39PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58989 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

2013-11-05 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:10:00PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

2013-11-05 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:03:25PM +, richard.koolhans at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #21 from

[Bug fortran/59065] questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays?

2013-11-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 08:13:14AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav

[Bug other/50900] 'gmake pdf' fails in libiberty

2013-11-25 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50900 --- Comment #14 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:15:53PM +, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50900 --- Comment #13 from joseph

[Bug fortran/59484] execute_command_line doesn't play with environment variables

2013-12-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59484 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:27:19PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Reinhold Straub from comment #0

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 06:10:23PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: By the time we reach gfc_int2int, the boz should have been converted to the integer

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:00PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/59654] Broken function table with complex OO use case

2013-12-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59654 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 05:02:53AM +, Thomas.L.Clune at nasa dot gov wrote: Ignore that output from Valgind. I was logged out between building and running

[Bug testsuite/54397] [regression] gfortran.dg/guality/pr41558.f90

2012-08-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-08-30 00:14:36 UTC --- On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:58:34PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397 Reading symbols

[Bug testsuite/54397] [regression] gfortran.dg/guality/pr41558.f90

2012-08-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-08-30 06:17:48 UTC --- On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 06:07:00AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54397 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/54463] -fdefault-real-8 does not promote the BLAS call when using -fexternal-blas

2012-09-03 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-09-03 13:38:36 UTC --- On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:14:22AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/54463] -fdefault-real-8 does not promote the BLAS call when using -fexternal-blas

2012-09-05 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-09-05 14:56:36 UTC --- On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 10:21:53AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54463 --- Comment #5

[Bug testsuite/54772] vectorization broken in gfortran on x86_64-*-freebsd

2012-10-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54772 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-10-02 18:48:12 UTC --- On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:25:46PM +, singhai at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai singhai at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/54797] Gnu Fortran compiler does not recognize module file it created

2012-10-03 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54797 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-10-03 19:55:46 UTC --- On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:37:24PM +, christopher.romick at gmail dot com wrote: I have indeed tried include -I but it makes

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-10-17 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-10-17 19:21:22 UTC --- On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:51:08PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The Standard does not define 'incremented

[Bug libfortran/54012] printf crash with -lgfortran

2012-10-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-10-30 13:20:46 UTC --- On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:52:04AM +, astroseger at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012

[Bug libfortran/54012] printf crash with -lgfortran

2012-10-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-10-30 17:57:51 UTC --- What does gdb tell you? gdb tells: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7779f8f2

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-04-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-04-24 14:49:18 UTC --- On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:57:43AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 Richard

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-04-25 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-04-25 13:32:26 UTC --- On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:46:03AM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Thus, the -fcheck=bounds error seems to be appropriate

[Bug fortran/53478] gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

2012-05-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-05-24 17:57:26 UTC --- On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:23:50PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: #1 0x0050aa91 in gfc_verify_binding_labels (sym=0x203cd1280

[Bug fortran/53478] gfortran segfaults when module name clashes with C binding name of procedure

2012-05-24 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2012-05-24 18:44:54 UTC --- On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:57:26PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: This patch allows the code to compile. I haven't

[Bug fortran/57628] spurious error: division by zero in if statement

2013-06-16 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 07:57:23AM +, furue at hawaii dot edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #2 from Ryo Furue furue

[Bug fortran/57628] spurious error: division by zero in if statement

2013-06-16 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:28:36PM +, furue at hawaii dot edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #9 from Ryo Furue furue

[Bug fortran/57628] spurious error: division by zero in if statement

2013-06-16 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:33:49PM +, furue at hawaii dot edu wrote: Is this an inconsistency in the implementation of -no-range-check ? No. I would be nice

[Bug fortran/57628] spurious error: division by zero in if statement

2013-06-17 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:07:32PM +, furue at hawaii dot edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57628 --- Comment #16 from Ryo Furue furue

[Bug fortran/52413] Incorrect behavior of FRACTION when applied to a constant

2013-06-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:57:56PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52413 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/57749] -ffpe-trap=zero or invalid produces SIGFPE on complex zero ** 1e0

2013-07-02 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749 --- Comment #18 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:21:54AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57749 --- Comment #16 from Vittorio Zecca zeccav

[Bug fortran/57871] gfortran -freal-4-real-16 gives wrong result for selected_real_kind(1)

2013-07-10 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57871 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:42:03PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: implicit none integer,parameter:: p1 = selected_real_kind(1) This initialization

[Bug fortran/57871] gfortran -freal-4-real-16 gives wrong result for selected_real_kind(1)

2013-07-11 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57871 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:30:04PM +, harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57871 --- Comment #5 from harper at msor dot

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

2013-07-29 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:03:53PM +, fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh

[Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions

2013-07-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:31:01PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: with -m32. The gfortran rationale is that Z'FF80' is converted to the highest integer

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence Extension: Tab character in format warning

2013-07-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:59:00PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: print *, AstringwithTabsinsteadofspaces print 1894 1894

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence Extension: Tab character in format warning

2013-07-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:59:00PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: If compiled with -Wno-tabs, it gives pr58001.f90:2.1: print 1894 1 Warning

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence Extension: Tab character in format warning

2013-07-30 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:16:27PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence Extension: Tab character in format warning

2013-07-31 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- The following patch causes gfortran to treat a tab within a FORMAT statement that same as it does elsewhere for the appearance of a nonconforming use of tab. The two tet

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

2013-08-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:08:18AM +, latlon90180+gcc_bugzilla at gmail dot com wrote: Is there any progress on this? REAL128 of gfortran4.8 is still 10. Need

[Bug fortran/58222] built-in:0:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2013-08-22 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58222 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:07:07AM +, blake.fumberger at gmail dot com wrote: --- Comment #3 from blake.fumberger at gmail dot com --- What compiler options did you

[Bug fortran/61632] Memory corruption on error when writing formatted data

2014-07-15 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:08:44AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61632 --- Comment #15 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/61831] [4.9.1 regression] runtime error: pointer being freed was not allocated

2014-07-17 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 07:14:19PM +, juergen.reuter at desy dot de wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831 --- Comment #2 from J??rgen Reuter

[Bug fortran/61847] bug in gfortran runtime on OSX: digits cut off when reading floating point number

2014-07-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 06:18:14PM +, e2cd58e1 at opayq dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 --- Comment #7 from e2cd58e1 at opayq

[Bug fortran/61847] bug in gfortran runtime: digits cut off when reading floating point number

2014-07-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 01:39:30AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle

[Bug fortran/61847] bug in gfortran runtime: digits cut off when reading floating point number

2014-07-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:27:58AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle

[Bug libfortran/62094] Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian)

2014-08-11 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 07:17:15PM +, sham at Central dot UH.EDU wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 --- Comment #2 from sham at Central dot

[Bug libfortran/62094] Program crash when executing DEALLOCATE with addresses that have 0 in bits 26 and higher (little-endian)

2014-08-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:40:06PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62094 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot

[Bug fortran/62215] Updating .mod files on Win32 fails

2014-08-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:21:50PM +, jeffrey.armstrong at approximatrix dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62215 --- Comment #2 from

[Bug libfortran/62188] Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

2014-08-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:08:22PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/62188] Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

2014-08-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 07:51:45AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:08:22PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Steve, should we also add

[Bug libfortran/62188] Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

2014-08-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:53:58AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 07:51:45AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:08:22PM +

[Bug libquadmath/63488] large errors in y0q

2014-10-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63488 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:34:11PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Testing 1 values in a small interval about the lowest 10 zeros, the double precision y0

[Bug libquadmath/63488] large errors in y0q

2014-10-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63488 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:27:08PM +, zimmerma+gcc at loria dot fr wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63488 --- Comment #7 from Paul Zimmermann

[Bug fortran/63529] Bad error and ICE with Cray Pointers in Modules

2014-10-13 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:49:52AM +, russelldub at gmail dot com wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63529 --- Comment #2 from russelldub

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-01-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- The attached patch fixes the code in comment #1. I'm currently doing the regtest.

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-01-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:29:42PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #3 from Steve

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-01-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:27:18AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-01-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 08:45:19PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-01-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:27:03PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-01-10 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #18 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:29:24PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug target/60088] Segfault when using quad precision and -march=native on gfortran

2014-02-05 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60088 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:25:27AM +, thatcadguy at gmail dot com wrote: If you bothered to look at the gcc output file, you'd see that I tested it on Linux

[Bug fortran/60110] internal compiler error

2014-02-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60110 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:11:17PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: It could be a duplicate of pr52332 (ICE at the same place). It might be. I've recall other

[Bug fortran/60148] strings in NAMELIST do not honor DELIM= in open statement

2014-02-11 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:12:52AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60148 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/59700] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer for item 0 in list input

2014-02-21 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #23 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 12:02:38AM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700 --- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle

[Bug fortran/60341] ICE compiling Nonmem 6.2.0

2014-02-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:15:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: The workaround should be obvious, but just encase Reduced testcase subroutine modelg

[Bug fortran/60341] ICE compiling Nonmem 6.2.0

2014-02-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60341 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 08:38:57PM +, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Looks like an unguarded union access. This is a regression from the time there was now front

[Bug middle-end/60147] [4.9 Regression] ICE with -fdump-tree-original and NAMELIST

2014-02-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60147 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:26:13PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: FIXED on the trunk. Thanks, Steve, for the report and sorry for the breakage! Thanks. I

[Bug fortran/60359] Assembler messages symbol `__io_MOD___copy_character_1' is already defined

2014-02-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:47:13PM +, antony at cosmologist dot info wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359 --- Comment #2 from Antony Lewis

[Bug fortran/60359] [OOP] symbol `__io_MOD___copy_character_1' is already defined

2014-02-28 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:36:54PM +, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60359 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/60447] Empty .s file created when using -E flag

2014-03-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 02:45:38PM +, vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com wrote: I see, but I just wanted to print the content or pipe it somewhere, so I don't think

[Bug fortran/60447] Empty .s file created when using -E flag

2014-03-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 03:01:52PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60447 --- Comment #5 from Steve

[Bug fortran/60593] ICE with deferred length variable in FORALL

2014-03-19 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- Here's a reduced testcase that appears to lead to the same ICE without the ISO C binding detour. function C2FChar(j, s) result(res) implicit none integer, intent

[Bug fortran/60593] ICE with deferred length variable in FORALL

2014-03-19 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 06:01:14PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- It looks similar

[Bug fortran/60596] Inquire size for stream zero

2014-03-19 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:27:15AM +, patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596 --- Comment #2 from patnel97269

[Bug fortran/60596] Inquire size for stream zero

2014-03-20 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60596 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:25:16AM +, patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr wrote: Ok so if I understand well, for gfortran once the input_unit is closed, the unit

[Bug fortran/60646] Investigate improved complex division algorithms

2014-03-25 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:36:35PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Can you be a little more specific on what you want to investigate? AFAIK, the general

[Bug fortran/60646] Investigate improved complex division algorithms

2014-03-25 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- Created attachment 32455 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32455action=edit cdiv.f90

[Bug fortran/60646] Investigate improved complex division algorithms

2014-03-25 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:57:56PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres

[Bug fortran/60751] Extra comma in WRITE statement not diagnosed

2014-04-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751 --- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 03:45:08PM +, w6ws at earthlink dot net wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60751 --- Comment #9 from Walter Spector w6ws

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

2014-04-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:09:11PM +, lauraelcomeau at yahoo dot co.uk wrote: The code is a series of f90 files compiled in a shell script - as attached. I've

[Bug fortran/60781] cannot match namelist object name

2014-04-08 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60781 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- Is this what you meant by the 'curly quotes'? No. Your input file contains curly quotes. I've changed the curly quotes to # show you where the problem lies

[Bug fortran/61069] Gfortran allows functions to be called as subroutines when defined in a separate source file

2014-05-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61069 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:41:13PM +, tristanmoody at gmail dot com wrote: I concede this point: the standard only specifies that the compiler catch nonconforming

[Bug fortran/61069] Gfortran allows functions to be called as subroutines when defined in a separate source file

2014-05-06 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61069 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu --- On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:17:42PM +, tristanmoody at gmail dot com wrote: (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5) The Fortran code conforms to the Fortran

[Bug target/50952] libquad relocation R_X86_64_32S failure

2011-11-04 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50952 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-04 23:01:13 UTC --- On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 05:57:15AM +, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote: Anyone know how to fix this issue properly? Yes, just

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-11-07 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-07 19:49:39 UTC --- On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:25:32PM +, inform at tiker dot net wrote: --- Comment #15 from Andreas Kloeckner inform at tiker dot net 2011-11

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

2011-11-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-12 16:52:37 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:51:32PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

2011-11-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-12 17:29:38 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:22:42PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #9

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

2011-11-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-12 17:58:18 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:53:39PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: This is what I originally did: 1. tar xvjf gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz 2

[Bug fortran/38312] Unexpected STATEMENT FUNCTION statement

2011-11-12 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2011-11-12 22:41:06 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:03:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 22:03:49 UTC

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >