[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-11-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-10 14:38:03 UTC --- Is this caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=180701 ? Maybe we need to remember if we have a special file after all

[Bug fortran/53824] ICE with ALLOCATE of coarrays

2012-11-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/55314] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 Bug #: 55314 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13 22:59:22 UTC --- Here's a tentative patch: Index: resolve.c === --- resolve.c (Revision 192894

[Bug fortran/54932] Invalid loop code generated by Fortran FE for loops with bounds in HIGH(type)

2012-11-18 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54932 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-11-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-24 12:05:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #27) (In reply to comment #26) Is this caused by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=180701

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-24 15:00:23 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Nov 24 15:00:16 2012 New Revision: 193778 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193778 Log: 2012-11-24

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-24 17:13:31 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Nov 24 17:13:25 2012 New Revision: 193780 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193780 Log: 2012-11-24

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-24 22:17:40 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Nov 24 22:17:35 2012 New Revision: 193784 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193784 Log: 2012-11-24

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

2012-11-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/30146] Redefining do-variable in excecution cycle

2012-11-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30146 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25 17:24:14 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Nov 25 17:24:09 2012 New Revision: 193793 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193793 Log: 2012-11-25

[Bug fortran/30146] Redefining do-variable in excecution cycle

2012-11-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30146 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/30609] Calculating masks twice

2012-12-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30609 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug fortran/51589] Modification of loop index variable by intent(out) or intent(inout) procedures

2012-12-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51589 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/55593] [4.8 Regression] Bogus error on passing DO LOOP variable

2012-12-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55593 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06 22:02:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) From frontend-passes.c's doloop_code case EXEC_CALL: f = co-symtree-n.sym-formal; I think one should

[Bug fortran/55593] [4.8 Regression] Bogus error on passing DO LOOP variable

2012-12-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55593 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-09 09:15:42 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Dec 9 09:15:36 2012 New Revision: 194329 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194329 Log: 2012-12-09

[Bug fortran/55593] [4.8 Regression] Bogus error on passing DO LOOP variable

2012-12-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55593 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #30 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-14 23:07:34 UTC --- This seems to do the trick. Index: unix.c === --- unix.c (Revision 194507

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-21 20:50:52 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Dec 21 20:50:48 2012 New Revision: 194679 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194679 Log: 2012-12-21

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 --- Comment #32 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-22 10:46:42 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Dec 22 10:46:37 2012 New Revision: 194694 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194694 Log: 2012-12-22

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

2012-12-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW

[Bug fortran/55806] New: Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2012-12-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 Bug #: 55806 Summary: Missed optimization with ANY or ALL Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug middle-end/55814] New: Missed optimization with short-circuit evaluation

2012-12-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814 Bug #: 55814 Summary: Missed optimization with short-circuit evaluation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/55814] Missed optimization with short-circuit evaluation of always evaluated comparisons/loads

2012-12-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-27 17:23:54 UTC --- An even more pronounced test case, where we could sink a lot more stores, which in fact could lead to moving a whole loop: logical function bar(a,b

[Bug fortran/55789] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Needless realloc with array constructor.

2013-01-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig

[Bug fortran/55839] New: Inefficiency with array constructor

2013-01-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55839 Bug #: 55839 Summary: Inefficiency with array constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug objc/55840] New: valgrind errors in sparseset.h

2013-01-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55840 Bug #: 55840 Summary: valgrind errors in sparseset.h Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/55840] valgrind errors in sparseset.h

2013-01-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55840 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|objc|other

[Bug fortran/54678] second call to get_environment_variable gives valgrind warning with 8-byte integers

2013-01-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54678 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/55852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647

2013-01-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig

[Bug fortran/55852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647

2013-01-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-06 21:59:13 UTC --- This patch works (not regression-tested yet), but the method using the state variable seems hackish and error-prone. What do you think? Index

[Bug bootstrap/55957] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap error in prop_value_t evaluate_stmt

2013-01-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957 Bug #: 55957 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap error in prop_value_t evaluate_stmt Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug bootstrap/55957] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap error in prop_value_t evaluate_stmt

2013-01-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/55957] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap error in prop_value_t evaluate_stmt

2013-01-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 12:14:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29154 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29154 Typescript from compilation Bootstrap compiler is Using built

[Bug bootstrap/55957] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap error in prop_value_t evaluate_stmt

2013-01-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/55978] New: [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

2013-01-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Bug #: 55978 Summary: [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

2013-01-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 21:29:25 UTC --- For -O0, valgrind complains about ==15263== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==15263==at 0x4F26355

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2013-01-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 21:50:35 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Jan 14 21:50:28 2013 New Revision: 195179 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195179 Log: 2013-01-14

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2013-01-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 22:29:37 UTC --- Now for something harder (which is Michael Metcalf's original idiom): if (any([a(1),a(2)]acc) then... This can be done by converting [a1, a2

[Bug fortran/55978] [4.8 Regression] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

2013-01-14 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-14 23:03:04 UTC --- A reduced test case which shows the problem in the dump: ! { dg-do run } ! { dg-options -fcoarray=single } ! ! PR fortran/50981 ! PR fortran

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2013-01-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] New: [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

2013-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Bug #: 56049 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

2013-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth

[Bug fortran/54033] gfortran: Passing file as include directory - add diagnostic and ICE with -cpp

2013-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54033 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2013-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29223|0 |1

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

2013-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig

[Bug fortran/55919] [4.8 Regression] Bogus warning with -J directory/

2013-01-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/56079] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming

2013-01-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Bug #: 56079 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

2013-01-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

2013-01-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

2013-01-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 22:56:43 UTC --- This also fails in the same place (without renaming): program gar_nichts use ISO_C_BINDING, only :: C_PTR, C_NULL_PTR type(c_ptr) nada

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

2013-01-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-25 23:10:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Sorry, an error in the test case. This has the same error: program gar_nichts use ISO_C_BINDING type(c_ptr) nada

[Bug fortran/50627] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2013-01-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2013-01-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29225|0 |1

[Bug fortran/33341] array temporaries for array constructors (unnecessary stores)

2013-01-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33341 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/55806] Missed optimization with ANY or ALL

2013-01-31 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55806 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31 21:01:58 UTC --- *** Bug 33341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/55839] Inefficiency with array constructor

2013-02-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55839 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/45159] Unnecessary temporaries

2013-02-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159 --- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-01 18:16:30 UTC --- To allow expressions like a(n:2*n:2) = a(n+1:2*n+1:2) to be optimized, I will try to write a function which calculates the difference between

[Bug fortran/56054] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3337

2013-02-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56054 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-02 09:51:03 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 2 09:50:58 2013 New Revision: 195684 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195684 Log: 2013-02-02

[Bug fortran/50627] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2013-02-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-02 09:51:03 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 2 09:50:58 2013 New Revision: 195684 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195684 Log: 2013-02-02

[Bug fortran/50627] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2013-02-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3

[Bug fortran/45159] Unnecessary temporaries

2013-02-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-02 21:31:37 UTC --- Created attachment 29340 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29340 patch which implements comment #27 Still have to verify

[Bug fortran/56054] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3337

2013-02-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56054 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-02 22:38:22 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 2 22:38:14 2013 New Revision: 195687 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195687 Log: 2013-02-02

[Bug fortran/50627] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2013-02-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-02 22:38:22 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Feb 2 22:38:14 2013 New Revision: 195687 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195687 Log: 2013-02-02

[Bug fortran/50627] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2013-02-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-03 13:15:24 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 3 13:15:18 2013 New Revision: 195695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195695 Log: 2013-02-03

[Bug fortran/56054] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3337

2013-02-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56054 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-03 13:15:24 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 3 13:15:18 2013 New Revision: 195695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195695 Log: 2013-02-03

[Bug fortran/50627] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

2013-02-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/59023] [4.9 regression] ICE in gfc_search_interface with BIND(C)

2013-12-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug fortran/58003] internal compiler error: in convert_mpz_to_unsigned, at fortran/simplify.c:165

2013-12-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58003 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/59604] New: Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Trying out a fix for PR 58003, I found that the following program was of the opinion that -1 does not equal -1: ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/NoRange cat bar.f90

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- TRANSFER gets this right.

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||58003

[Bug fortran/59612] New: iso_fortran_env segfaults with -fdump-fortran-original

2013-12-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/NoRange cat iso.f90 program main use iso_fortran_env end program main ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/NoRange gfortran -fdump-fortran-original iso.f90 Namespace

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/59604] Constant comparisons with -fno-range-check and int(z'...')

2013-12-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59604 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/54234] -Wconversion or -Wconversion-extra should warn for CMPLX(dp,dp)

2012-08-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54234 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug fortran/54298] Add warning when doing equal/nonequal floating-point comparisons

2012-08-17 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/54298] Add warning when doing equal/nonequal floating-point comparisons

2012-08-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-19 15:05:49 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Aug 19 15:05:41 2012 New Revision: 190516 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190516 Log: 2012-08-19 Thomas K├Ânig

[Bug fortran/54298] Add warning when doing equal/nonequal floating-point comparisons

2012-08-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/54302] Add optional warning when declaring a identifier in a nested scope, which matches on otherwise available one

2012-08-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54302 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/54301] Add optional warning if pointer assigning a local variable to a nonlocal pointer

2012-08-19 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

2012-09-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc

[Bug bootstrap/54419] [4.8 Regression] Compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/random.cc fails on platforms not knowing rdrand

2012-09-01 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug fortran/54465] New: Implement -Wextra for Fortran

2012-09-03 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54465 Bug #: 54465 Summary: Implement -Wextra for Fortran Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity:

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-22 10:32:58 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Sep 22 10:32:51 2012 New Revision: 191640 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191640 Log: 2012-09-22 Thomas

[Bug fortran/54599] Issues found in gfortran by the Coverity Scan

2012-09-22 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/54687] New: Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

2012-09-23 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Bug #: 54687 Summary: Use gcc option machinery for gfortran Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/52724] Internal read with character(kind=4) data

2012-09-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-24 18:07:17 UTC --- This patch looks promising: Index: list_read.c === --- list_read.c (Revision 191649

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-09-28 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52724] Internal read with character(kind=4) data

2012-09-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-29 17:38:50 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Sep 29 17:38:46 2012 New Revision: 191854 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=191854 Log: 2012-09-29 Thomas

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-09-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong

[Bug fortran/54833] New: Don't wrap __builtin_free(a) in if (a != NULL)

2012-10-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54833 Bug #: 54833 Summary: Don't wrap __builtin_free(a) in if (a != NULL) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-10-06 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 13:04:38 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Oct 6 13:04:35 2012 New Revision: 192158 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192158 Log: 2012-10-06 Thomas

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-10-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-12 18:56:23 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Oct 12 18:56:16 2012 New Revision: 192408 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192408 Log: 2012-10-06 Thomas

[Bug libfortran/54736] GFORTRAN_CONVERT_UNIT causes malloc error on several platforms

2012-10-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54736 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-12 19:38:09 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Oct 12 19:38:04 2012 New Revision: 192411 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192411 Log: 2012-10-12 Thomas

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

2012-10-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-20 12:10:49 UTC --- Another approach (not for the benchmarks) would be to make inlining tunable by the user, e.g. support !GCC$ ATTRIBUTES always_inline

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >