[Bug rtl-optimization/51014] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in apply_opt_in_copies, at loop-unroll.c:2283 with -O2 -g -funroll-loops

2011-11-08 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51014 Wouter Vermaelen wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug lto/49237] error with -flto: 'f' causes a section type conflict

2011-12-16 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49237 --- Comment #2 from Wouter Vermaelen wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2011-12-16 19:28:36 UTC --- I also can't reproduce it anymore.

[Bug rtl-optimization/50339] New: suboptimal register allocation for abs(__int128_t)

2011-09-09 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50339 Bug #: 50339 Summary: suboptimal register allocation for abs(__int128_t) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/50385] New: missed-optimization: jump to __builtin_unreachable() not removed

2011-09-13 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50385 Bug #: 50385 Summary: missed-optimization: jump to __builtin_unreachable() not removed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] New: regression: memcpy with known alignment

2011-09-15 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 Bug #: 50417 Summary: regression: memcpy with known alignment Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug lto/48354] New: internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064

2011-03-30 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354 Summary: internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:8064 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/48764] New: wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict

2011-04-25 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764 Summary: wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/49203] New: missed-optimization: useless expressions not moved out of loop

2011-05-27 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49203 Summary: missed-optimization: useless expressions not moved out of loop Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug lto/49237] New: error with -flto: 'f' causes a section type conflict

2011-05-30 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49237 Summary: error with -flto:'f' causes a section type conflict Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/49552] New: missed optimization: test for zero remainder after division by a constant.

2011-06-27 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49552 Summary: missed optimization: test for zero remainder after division by a constant. Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/49552] missed optimization: test for zero remainder after division by a constant.

2011-06-28 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49552 --- Comment #2 from Wouter Vermaelen wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be 2011-06-28 12:22:11 UTC --- Confirmed. Is this possible for all constant moduli? It is. I recommend you get a copy of the book I mentioned before. The theory behind

[Bug 45764] (tree-optimization) New: wrong code -O2 vs -O3 (problem in vectorizer???)

2010-09-23 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764 Summary: wrong code -O2 vs -O3(problem in vectorizer???) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/46780] New: -fgraphite-identity ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1081

2010-12-03 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46780 Summary: -fgraphite-identity ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1081 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3