https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98222
Bug ID: 98222
Summary: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: verify_cgraph_node
failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98229
Bug ID: 98229
Summary: ICE at -O1 in 32-bit mode on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu in
decompose, at rtl.h:2282
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98256
Bug ID: 98256
Summary: ICE at -Os and above: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255
Bug ID: 98255
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above with -fPIC on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821
Bug ID: 97821
Summary: wrong code with -ftree-vectorize at -O1 on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97888
Bug ID: 97888
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97901
Bug ID: 97901
Summary: ICE at -Os: verify_gimple failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97765
Bug ID: 97765
Summary: ICE at -Os: in clear_slot, at hash-table.h:891
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97764
Bug ID: 97764
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97746
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97808
Bug ID: 97808
Summary: ICE at -Os and above: in clean, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2053
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
Bug ID: 97836
Summary: wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
Another related test that triggers the miscompilation at -Os, but not -O1:
[621] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[622] %
[622] % gcctk -Os small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[623] %
[623] % cat small.c
int a;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97838
Bug ID: 97838
Summary: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695
Bug ID: 97695
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695
--- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su ---
Another repro for the same issue (as -fno-ipa-cp also avoids it):
[579] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
[580] % gcctk -O3 small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[581] % gcctk -O3 -fno-ipa-cp small.c; ./a.out
[582] %
[582] %
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97559
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97725
Bug ID: 97725
Summary: ICE at -Os and above: tree check: expected class
‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97737
Bug ID: 97737
Summary: ICE at -Os and above: tree check: expected class
‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:88
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97737
--- Comment #4 from Zhendong Su ---
I would guess that it makes more sense to mark PR 97741 as a dup of this bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101086
Bug ID: 101086
Summary: ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu with "-ftracer
-fvar-tracking-assignments -fsel-sched-pipelining
-fselective-scheduling -fschedule-insns": in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101151
Bug ID: 101151
Summary: ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_ssa
failed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101202
Bug ID: 101202
Summary: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100601
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> Please avoid creating trivial duplicates.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 100453 ***
Okay Eric; I had overlooked this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100492
Bug ID: 100492
Summary: wrong code at -O3 (generated code hangs)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
Bug ID: 100453
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100636
Bug ID: 100636
Summary: ICE at -Os and above: tree check: expected class
‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in
useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:88
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100539
Bug ID: 100539
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce
-fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-dce"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100601
Bug ID: 100601
Summary: wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
Bug ID: 100810
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100923
Bug ID: 100923
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100923
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
It seems to affect all versions since 9.*, but not 8.*.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Bug ID: 100934
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740
Bug ID: 100740
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101189
Bug ID: 101189
Summary: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
fold_cond, at vr-values.c:3471
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101223
Bug ID: 101223
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101335
Bug ID: 101335
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100359
Bug ID: 100359
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100315
Bug ID: 100315
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3,
-O2 (vs. -O1, -Os)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
Bug ID: 100314
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99751
Bug ID: 99751
Summary: wrong code at -O1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99793
Bug ID: 99793
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -Os,
-O2 and -O3 (vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99776
Bug ID: 99776
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99834
Bug ID: 99834
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99835
Bug ID: 99835
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99834
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
Hi Richard and all, thanks for analyzing these reports!
I have some more cases, and wonder whether you folks would prefer that I open a
meta issue report and append these (and others that we find) to that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99943
Bug ID: 99943
Summary: wrong code at -Os
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
--- Comment #4 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> generally meta-bugs are created to collect other issues under their "Depends
> On" field; do you have any other bug numbers to add here?
Hi Eric, no, I don't, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99788
Bug ID: 99788
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
Bug ID: 99862
Summary: [meta-issue] various missed optimizations for dead
code elimination
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
[659] % gcctk -O1 -S -o O1.s small.c
[660] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c
[661] %
[661] % wc O1.s O3.s
40 86 599 O1.s
68 138 1047 O3.s
108 224 1646 total
[662] %
[662] % grep foo O1.s
[663] % grep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
[578] % gcctk -O1 -S -o O1.s small.c
[579] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c
[580] %
[580] % wc O1.s O3.s
22 43 410 O1.s
37 77 682 O3.s
59 120 1092 total
[581] %
[581] % grep foo O1.s
[582] % grep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99776
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su ---
Awesome! Thanks for looking into this so quickly, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99373
Bug ID: 99373
Summary: [missed optimization] dead code not eliminated from
short circuiting
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99373
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
The following might be the same/related. The dead call is eliminated if b is
changed to:
static int b(int *c) {
foo();
d++;
}
[623] % gcctk -O3 -S small.c
[624] %
[624] % cat small.c
extern void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99428
Bug ID: 99428
Summary: possible missed optimization for dead code elimination
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99419
Bug ID: 99419
Summary: possible missed optimization for dead code elimination
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99862
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su ---
> For the future please open separate bugs for separate testcases.
Thanks, Richard; will do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99987
Bug ID: 99987
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99986
Bug ID: 99986
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99986
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think this is a duplicate of PR99776 since I can't reproduce with this fix
> in.
Thanks for looking into it, Richard!
Would you mind also checking the few
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100095
Bug ID: 100095
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100100
Bug ID: 100100
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100050
Bug ID: 100050
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100051
Bug ID: 100051
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -Os,
-O2 and -O3 (vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100145
Bug ID: 100145
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100082
Bug ID: 100082
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100080
Bug ID: 100080
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100162
Bug ID: 100162
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100033
Bug ID: 100033
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100034
Bug ID: 100034
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100036
Bug ID: 100036
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -Os,
-O2 and -O3 (vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100112
Bug ID: 100112
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3,
-Os (vs. -O1, -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100113
Bug ID: 100113
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100221
Bug ID: 100221
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100220
Bug ID: 100220
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1, -Os, -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100188
Bug ID: 100188
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O1)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100191
Bug ID: 100191
Summary: missed optimization for dead code elimination at -O3
(vs. -O2)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Bug ID: 102087
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
determine_exit_conditions, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1049
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102403
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102364
Bug ID: 102364
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101797
Bug ID: 101797
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: in
extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102645
Bug ID: 102645
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu:
Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102736
Bug ID: 102736
Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102830
Bug ID: 102830
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102769
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su ---
> Don't apologize, you have created very many wrong-code issues.
> We appreciate the effort of your team.
Thanks, Martin :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102769
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
Interesting --- it was missed by clang-10 sanitizers and the CompCert
interpreter (a pretty rare occurrence):
[565] % ccomp -interp -fall small.c
small.c:13: warning: implicit declaration of function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102769
--- Comment #7 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> (In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #5)
> > Yes, it's clear that the code is invalid. I should update my reduction
> > script to use more recent clang and gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102769
Bug ID: 102769
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102769
--- Comment #5 from Zhendong Su ---
Yes, it's clear that the code is invalid. I should update my reduction script
to use more recent clang and gcc for ruling out UBs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102769
--- Comment #11 from Zhendong Su ---
> s/created/reported/
> We as GCC developers have created them.
Thanks for this clarification, Jakob :)
> Anyway, thanks for all the bug reports.
Sure thing. Thanks to all you folks for the great work in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102636
Bug ID: 102636
Summary: wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Bug ID: 102446
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
Bug ID: 102131
Summary: wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102546
--- Comment #7 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> > I think it's similar to in the other PR, with old EVRP when visiting BB 8
>
> BTW, which is this other PR, so I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103873
Bug ID: 103873
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103860
Bug ID: 103860
Summary: wrong code at -O3 with -fPIC on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103376
Bug ID: 103376
Summary: wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103300
Bug ID: 103300
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103231
Bug ID: 103231
Summary: ICE (nondeterministic) on valid code at -O1 on
x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
