[Bug ada/117328] iterated component association fails for array with large index type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |13.4 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- Fixed on mainline, 14 and 13 branches.
[Bug ada/117328] iterated component association fails for array with large index type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6214b83e10d26bf116d4fca9de07a14cf4358cd commit r13-9180-gd6214b83e10d26bf116d4fca9de07a14cf4358cd Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Wed Oct 30 11:22:12 2024 +0100 ada: Fix spurious error on iterated component association with large index type This is only for the Ada 2022 form of the iterated component association. gcc/ada/ChangeLog: PR ada/117328 * exp_aggr.adb (Two_Pass_Aggregate_Expansion): Use a type sized from the index type to compute the length. Simplify and remove useless calls to New_Copy_Tree for this computation.
[Bug ada/117328] iterated component association fails for array with large index type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4d1e1f947d5dade8474cb39516b60422bcc3c245 commit r14-10923-g4d1e1f947d5dade8474cb39516b60422bcc3c245 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Wed Oct 30 11:22:12 2024 +0100 ada: Fix spurious error on iterated component association with large index type This is only for the Ada 2022 form of the iterated component association. gcc/ada/ChangeLog: PR ada/117328 * exp_aggr.adb (Two_Pass_Aggregate_Expansion): Use a type sized from the index type to compute the length. Simplify and remove useless calls to New_Copy_Tree for this computation.
[Bug ada/117328] iterated component association fails for array with large index type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d34069c3ffaac95ba880ba12de26972bc3fb91b8 commit r15-5160-gd34069c3ffaac95ba880ba12de26972bc3fb91b8 Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Wed Oct 30 11:22:12 2024 +0100 ada: Fix spurious error on iterated component association with large index type This is only for the Ada 2022 form of the iterated component association. gcc/ada/ChangeLog: * exp_aggr.adb (Two_Pass_Aggregate_Expansion): Use a type sized from the index type to compute the length. Simplify and remove useless calls to New_Copy_Tree for this computation.
[Bug ada/117328] iterated component association fails for array with large index type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Investigating.
[Bug ada/117328] iterated component association fails for array with large index type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117328 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Iterated component |iterated component |association fails for array |association fails for array |indexed by |with large index type |Stream_Element_Offset | CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2024-10-29 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- > but if the current declaration of type Integers is replaced by the > commented-out one below it, compilation succeeds. And fails again after s/Integer/Long_Integer/ for the index type. Strange.
