https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
I will go back and re-bootstrap with a revision that failed earlier.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Are you sure you e.g. haven't svn/git updated the tree while bootstrap was
pending? Can you reproduce it again, or was it just one-off? If you still
have the tree around, what are the differences in the two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not reproduced on gcc110.fsffrance.org again with r259240:
../configure --enable-languages=all --prefix=/home/jakub/GCC
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |8.0.1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Looking backwards... r257361 fails, r254161 is OK.
Some more bisection to follow...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85280
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |bootstrap
Summary|[8 Regressi
