[Bug c++/117472] pack of function parameters without a name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Patch for that has been already posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/thread.html#651199 and that part of the fix left out in the end.
[Bug c++/117472] pack of function parameters without a name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Makes sense. Closing.
[Bug c++/117472] pack of function parameters without a name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- MSVC also doesn't implement the stated C++23 behavior, though EDG does. Given how widely unsupported this has been, I probably wouldn't bother implementing it at this point, and just treat this as a pack expansion like Clang.
[Bug c++/117472] pack of function parameters without a name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv ||m-project/issues/115222 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Submitted to clang since they now interrupt it incorrectly for -std=c++11 (to -std=c++23) too.
[Bug c++/117472] pack of function parameters without a name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117472 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2024-11-06 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Interesting clang 19+ gives a warning: :2:8: warning: pack indexing is a C++2c extension [-Wc++26-extensions] 2 | void f(T...[1]); |^ Which is wrong in a way but that is because it is just incompatible between C++26 and C++23-.
