[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2011-05-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mark at codesourcery dot|jason at

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2011-05-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 17:32:43 UTC --- That patch looks fine to me.

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2011-05-03 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-03 18:30:41 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue May 3 18:30:37 2011 New Revision: 173337 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173337 Log: /cp 2011-05-03

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2011-05-03 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2009-11-12 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-13 02:35 --- Not seriously working on this, unassigning (for now at least) -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2009-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-08 20:53 --- Paolo -- I didn't realize that something like __real__ 3 was valid GNU C; I thought that the argument had to have complex type. But, it looks like that is not the case. Given that, yes, I think the test case

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2009-02-07 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-02-07 11:11 --- Mark, can I have your opinion about this issue? I'm still thinking we could rather easily accept the code... Thanks in advance. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2009-01-30 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-31 02:06 --- I don't think this is invalid, want to look a bit into it: I'm attaching a draft patch which makes sense to me, i.e. if a definition of the operator is provided, i is initialized to the correct value. --

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2009-01-30 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-31 02:07 --- Created an attachment (id=17219) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17219action=view) draft I'm using as a starting point -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28501

[Bug c++/28501] ICE with __real__ and implicit type conversion

2006-09-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-03 06:08 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added