[Bug c++/35101] Const object creation with mutable field

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-23 10:14 ---
The example was wrong, fixed by DR 497
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#497


-- 

redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35101

[Bug c++/35101] Const object creation with mutable field

2008-02-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-06 12:38 ---
Please quote the relevant parts of the standard.  IMHO cs needs an initializer
or an explicitly declared default constructor.  And no, examples in the std
are not always without errors.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35101

[Bug c++/35101] Const object creation with mutable field

2008-02-06 Thread tatraian at inf dot elte dot hu 


--- Comment #2 from tatraian at inf dot elte dot hu  2008-02-06 13:43 
---
The example is in the section: [expr.mptr.oper]
But, if the stadnadr code examples can contain errors maybe this is one of
them.
The whole example is the next:

struct S {
   mutable int i;
};

const S cs;
int S::* pm = S::i;  // pm refers to mutable member S::i
cs.*pm = 88;// ill-formed: cs is a const object


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35101