http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bangerth at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
12:44:23 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Nov 2 12:44:19 2010
New Revision: 166179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166179
Log:
Restore canonical type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02
13:04:30 UTC ---
This is fixed in 4.6.
For 4.5, I think committing this as is is far too risky so I'd wait to see
how solid it is for 4.6 and see if I can safely backport
--- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-19 20:33 ---
I rewrote the handling of typedef comparison to put canonical type comparison
back. I believe this approach is simpler and happens to fix this issue.
A candidate patch was sent to
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45606
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-09 18:23 ---
It is caused by revision 156316:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00784.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
