https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The testcase in comment 1 originally made three calls to _ZN4BaseC2Ev until
r238688 when it made two, and then only one call after r238689 (the fix for PR
66617).
So it looks like the reason it's still
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-06-25 00:00:00 |2018-2-19
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 18 18:33:52 2017
New Revision: 252937
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252937=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/55922 - list-value-initialization of base
PR c++/63151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #11 from DB ---
This still occurs in 6.3.0
In the duplicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
I showed that whether or not this occurs can sometimes (I say because my
results don't seem consistent with everyone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #10 from DB ---
*** Bug 80849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
DB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||db0451 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from DB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #8 from nicolas.cavallari at lri dot fr ---
While your minimal test case seems to be fixed, my test case still fails on GCC
6.2.0 (Debian):
The output is now:
Base ctor is called at 0x7fff79b27a14
A1::Base is at 0x7fff79b27a14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 6.2/7 so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jul 24 03:05:46 2016
New Revision: 238694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238694=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/55922 - list-value-initialization of base
PR c++/63151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Jul 24 02:56:22 2016
New Revision: 238688
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238688=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/55922 - list-value-initialization of base
PR c++/63151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcorbat at hsr dot ch
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
bool called = false;
struct Base {
Base() { if (called) throw 1; called = true; }
};
struct B1 : virtual Base {
B1() { }
};
struct C : B1, virtual Base {
C() :
#ifdef FIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #1 from nicolas.cavallari at lri dot fr 2013-01-09 17:42:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 29129
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29129
same source with more outputs.
Example output of what i have on my system
19 matches
Mail list logo
