https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Blocks|54367
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini ---
Barring further comments, I'm going to add a testcase and close this.
(Note, current clang still accepts it)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from TC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
This looks like a more fundamental name lookup problem of gcc to me. It can be
reproduced with function object types that are no lambda closures:
template class... Fs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
