[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||law at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Agreed, this is a DUP of 77563. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 77563 ***
[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- I will have a closer look but I think this is an almost exact dup of c++/77563
[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ||jason at gcc dot gnu.org, ||paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- This started to ICE with r229283, before that it has been rejected. And r236395 fixed the ICE, but accepts it.
[Bug c++/78032] [5/6/7 Regression] Incorrect code generated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78032 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2016-10-19 Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|Incorrect code generated|[5/6/7 Regression] ||Incorrect code generated Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- <>>) >; GCC 5.3 produced: t8932.cc:11:20: error: converting to ‘foo’ from initializer list would use explicit constructor ‘foo::foo(unsigned int)’ void bar(foo x = 0u) ^ t8932.cc: In function ‘int main()’: t8932.cc:18:13: error: converting to ‘foo’ from initializer list would use explicit constructor ‘foo::foo(unsigned int)’ bar(); ^ Confirmed.