[Bug c++/91705] [9 Regression] operator++ broken in constexpr floating point code

2019-09-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91705 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cyp561 at gmail dot com --- Comment #13

[Bug c++/91705] [9 Regression] operator++ broken in constexpr floating point code

2019-09-10 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91705 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91705] [9 Regression] operator++ broken in constexpr floating point code

2019-09-10 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91705 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Sep 10 22:39:46 2019 New Revision: 275615 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275615=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/91705 - constexpr evaluation rejects ++/-- on floats. *

[Bug c++/91705] [9 Regression] operator++ broken in constexpr floating point code

2019-09-10 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91705 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] |[9 Regression] operator++