https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Roskin ---
Confirming fix on the original code. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08c8c973c082457a7d6192673e87475f1fdfdbef
commit r10-5949-g08c8c973c082457a7d6192673e87475f1fdfdbef
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
This is a consequence of the change Jonathan cites, to treat the inherited
constructor as a user-declared constructor that prevents the implicit
declaration of a default constructor in Derived.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92590
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
