https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
Michael Bruck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
to summarise.
This doesn't appear to be a bug in GCC (or clang) but something perhaps that
could benefit from a clarifying note in the std?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #5)
> > Since the coroutine traits are global, and the closure type is unique,
> > that provides a way to disambiguate instantiations of the traits for
> > lambdas with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #5 from Michael Bruck ---
> Since the coroutine traits are global, and the closure type is unique,
> that provides a way to disambiguate instantiations of the traits for
> lambdas with otherwise identical signatures.
But the closure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Michael Bruck from comment #3)
> I think you misread, I was complaining about it passing the closure to the
> traits/constructor/allocator. But if that is what was agreed upon...
>
> Can the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #3 from Michael Bruck ---
I think you misread, I was complaining about it passing the closure to the
traits/constructor/allocator. But if that is what was agreed upon...
Can the closure object that is being passed to the constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95540
--- Comment #1 from Michael Bruck ---
"impossible" is too strong here, you can add another overload:
template struct std::coroutine_traits
{ using promise_type = pt; };
