[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 12:52:06 2016 New Revision: 243851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243851=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77767 * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If *expr is non-NULL,

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 21 00:07:49 2016 New Revision: 243832 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243832=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77767 * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): If *expr is non-NULL,

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Unfortunately that version breaks the pr49120.c testcase, because mark_exp_read doesn't deal with STATEMENT_LISTs. I'll test the other patch.

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-20 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think the append_to_statement_list version should be preferred.

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 40378 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40378=edit gcc7-pr77767-2.patch Version with append_to_statement_list.

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-12-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-09-29 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-09-29 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/77767] [5/6/7 Regression] Side-effect from VLA array parameters lost

2016-09-27 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77767 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.5 Summary|Side-effect