[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-04-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 89791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Mar 27 09:31:53 2019 New Revision: 269961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269961=gcc=rev Log: 2019-03-27 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/89463 *

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-25 Thread qrzhang at gatech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #9 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-03/msg01192.html > > Some of your bugs might turn out as duplicates if they are fixed by that > patch.

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-25 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, qrzhang at gatech dot edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 > > --- Comment #9 from Qirun Zhang --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-03/msg01192.html Some of your bugs might turn out as duplicates if they are fixed by that patch.

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-21 Thread qrzhang at gatech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #6 from Qirun Zhang --- As mentioned in my earlier comment, the revision should be between gcc-5 and gcc-6. Bisect points to r239357. commit ec969ce4161538b561592a032eca6dcfaf513596 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Aug 11 09:02:04

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-21 Thread qrzhang at gatech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #5 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to Qirun Zhang from comment #4) > Bisect points to r151362. > > commit ff79704e04af919c4fe501c7dceca8b21cced614 > Author: aoliva > Date: Thu Sep 3 05:24:57 2009 + > > * toplev.c

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-03-21 Thread qrzhang at gatech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #4 from Qirun Zhang --- Bisect points to r151362. commit ff79704e04af919c4fe501c7dceca8b21cced614 Author: aoliva Date: Thu Sep 3 05:24:57 2009 + * toplev.c (process_options): Enable var-tracking-assignments by

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-02-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-02-22 Thread qrzhang at gatech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 --- Comment #2 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > What is happening is the empty loop is being removed and not replaced with a > debug statement say i is 6 afterwards. I don't know if this is a good idea > to put

[Bug debug/89463] debug information for iteractor of an empty loop is gone (at -O3)

2019-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89463 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc generates wrong debug |debug information for