[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2024-07-20 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 59104, which changed state.

Bug 59104 Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2024-07-19 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 59104, which changed state.

Bug 59104 Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2022-05-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 47359, which changed state.

Bug 47359 Summary: Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates invalid 
assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2020-05-28 Thread markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 50392, which changed state.

Bug 50392 Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2020-01-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 65428, which changed state.

Bug 65428 Summary: ICE on nest array constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65428

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2018-03-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 64124, which changed state.

Bug 64124 Summary: [F95] Valid constant expr rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2018-03-06 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 64107, which changed state.

Bug 64107 Summary: [F95] Pure function as array size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2018-02-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 48890, which changed state.

Bug 48890 Summary: [F95] Wrong length of a character component of named 
constant derived-type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48890

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2017-09-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 66328, which changed state.

Bug 66328 Summary: Wrong initialization of derived-type DATA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66328

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2017-09-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.

Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2017-09-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.

Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|FIXED   |---

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2017-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 34640, which changed state.

Bug 34640 Summary: ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2016-09-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 77560, which changed state.

Bug 77560 Summary: Redefinition of lower bound in explicit-shape dummy argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77560

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2015-06-05 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 66377, which changed state.

Bug 66377 Summary: [F95] Wrong-code with equivalenced array in module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66377

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2015-06-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 58749, which changed state.

Bug 58749 Summary: PACK(ADJUSTL([" a"," b"]), [.TRUE.,.FALSE.]) causes an 
internal compiler error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58749

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2015-05-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 44735, which changed state.

Bug 44735 Summary: ICE on FORALL with character array pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2015-01-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 56867, which changed state.

Bug 56867 Summary: Missing temporary with string array assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2015-01-24 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 57023, which changed state.

Bug 57023 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Not packing arrays with changing variable 
used for size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57023

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2007-07-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 


--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2007-07-20 17:17 ---
from the 19 wrong code bugs I've only retained 8 that I judged as user visible,
F95, and triggered without additional options. 


-- 

jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  BugsThisDependsOn||30625, 31205, 31211, 31487,
   ||31608


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2007-07-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 


--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2007-07-20 17:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?

no, I overlooked that keyword, and they belong to this category (though I'll
again  ignore arch specific ones). I'll add them to the list shortly. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2007-07-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-07-20 16:42 ---
Should we open another PR for wrong-code errors?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

2007-07-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||meta-bug
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-20 12:25:13
   date||
Summary|[Meta-bugs] 'Fortran 95'-   |[Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only
   |only failures   |failures


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834