https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #40 from francois.jacq at irsn dot fr ---
Happy to learn that this old bug is solved now. 9 years : just enough to get
good wine !
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #39 from Matt Thompson ---
Thanks! I'll keep an eye out for this in an upcoming release so I can test with
GEOS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #38 from Walter Spector ---
Paul,
THANK YOU!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #37 from Damian Rouson ---
Bravo!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #35 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Sep 10 17:02:53 2017
New Revision: 251949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251949=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-09-10 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/34640
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
AFAICT the patch fixes all the issues of this PR and its duplicates (I have
found two more). It also compiles the tests in pr55763, but gives a wrong
output
0. 1.1002
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Bader at lrz dot de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot
gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #31 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominique,
I had suspected that. Thanks for the confirmation!
Cheers
Paul
On 10 June 2017 at 18:46, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Le 10 juin 2017 à 19:40, pault at gcc dot gnu.org
> a écrit :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
>
> --- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 41534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41534=edit
An unpolished patch for the bug
Dear All,
Since I am not going to have any time to fix the array descriptor reform on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at sourceryinstitute
dot or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #27 from chester.gingrich at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 38089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38089=edit
workaround (of sorts)
This is how I get around this issue.
Note that I don't usually have to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nerge at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-04-06 10:57:29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #20 from Martin Otte otte.martin at epa dot gov 2011-05-31
14:05:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24403
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24403
Example program that causes an ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Martin Otte otte.martin at epa dot gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||otte.martin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Franke dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28
22:30:10 UTC ---
Other potential dupes: PR40737, PR45128.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.sagan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at
--- Comment #14 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:22
---
*** Bug 42851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:28
---
*** Bug 38471 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #16 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-18 22:30
---
The dupes PR38471 and PR42851 have more testcases, the former an equally
lengthy discussion as this PR.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-27 19:48
---
*** Bug 43091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-27 20:08 ---
As pointed out in comment #10 pr38471 is a duplicate of this one, as well as
pr42851 (see comment #1 of pr43091). They all give the same backtrace:
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-06 10:57 ---
Enfin, j'aborde le boulot
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 16:13 ---
As fj pointed out: PR 38471 might be a duplicate of this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-06 06:26 ---
It helps to mark it correctly!
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-06 06:24 ---
Wait until 4.5.0 since it needs the array descriptor reform to be fixed.
Unassigning self for present until we decide who will be responsible for the
work.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-05 20:26 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Jacques,
Now that 4.3 is out of the door, I have no excuse. It's in the queue behind
completing my move to Barcelona, memory leaks in allocatable components + some
associated bugs and
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 13:24 ---
Jacques,
Now that 4.3 is out of the door, I have no excuse. It's in the queue behind
completing my move to Barcelona, memory leaks in allocatable components + some
associated bugs and adding procedure pointers.
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 09:14 ---
Reduced test; has nothing to do with BIND(C). I am not 100% sure it is valid.
(Actually, glancing at the code, I had said it is invalid). However, it gives
no error/warning (or ICE) with other compilers such as NAG
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 15:24 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Reduced test; has nothing to do with BIND(C). I am not 100% sure it is valid.
(Actually, glancing at the code, I had said it is invalid). However, it gives
no error/warning (or ICE) with
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 17:58 ---
I'm taking a look at how it might be done.
This allows compilation to proceed:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
41 matches
Mail list logo