http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #17 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
13:30:57 UTC ---
Author: domob
Date: Tue Oct 12 13:30:53 2010
New Revision: 165378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165378
Log:
2010-10-12 Daniel Kraft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Kraft domob at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12
13:37:44 UTC ---
This commit did implement better handling for association to derived-types, but
some cases are still not handled (see the XFAIL of associate_9.f03). I wanted
--- Comment #15 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:38 ---
Subject: Bug 38936
Author: domob
Date: Thu Sep 23 08:37:54 2010
New Revision: 164550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164550
Log:
2010-09-23 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/38936
--- Comment #13 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-26 19:49 ---
Subject: Bug 38936
Author: domob
Date: Thu Aug 26 19:48:43 2010
New Revision: 163572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163572
Log:
2010-08-26 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/38936
--- Comment #14 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-26 19:54 ---
This fixed association to CLASS entities and also reworked SELECT TYPE to use
the same workings internally. Still open: Association to strings and
derived-types, and the extended checks for illegal usage of names
--- Comment #11 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:57 ---
*** Bug 45369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:58 ---
See also PR 45369 which has a rather complicated test-case for association to
derived-types (as is currently not yet working).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #9 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 08:20 ---
Subject: Bug 38936
Author: domob
Date: Tue Aug 17 08:20:03 2010
New Revision: 163295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163295
Log:
2010-08-17 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/38936
--- Comment #10 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 08:23 ---
This implements association to variables and removes the problems that were
still there with array expressions and bounds. What's still missing is:
* Association to polymorphic entities
* Association to strings
--- Comment #8 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 08:59 ---
Also one thing to note is that associate-names associated to expressions (which
must not appear in variable definition contexts) are currently accepted as
actual arguments to INTENT([IN]OUT) arguments. This should
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-15 19:46 ---
Subject: Bug 38936
Author: domob
Date: Sun Aug 15 19:46:21 2010
New Revision: 163268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163268
Log:
2010-08-15 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/38936
--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-15 20:25 ---
This extended the support to array-expressions -- the original example works
now. Next will be a rework to do the association in the trans phase, which is
probably necessary to get full array support and association
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 14:48 ---
Subject: Bug 38936
Author: domob
Date: Thu Jun 10 14:47:49 2010
New Revision: 160550
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=160550
Log:
2010-06-10 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu
PR fortran/38936
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 16:50 ---
This first commit implements association to scalar expressions as a first step.
More to follow.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-08 13:24 ---
Taking this finally.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-09 12:08 ---
SELECT TYPE (name = expr)
and
ASSOCIATE (name1 = expr1, name2 = expr2)
have similar syntax and issues. SELECT TYPE (name=expr) is already implemented
(via creating a new pointer variable), but it has some issues.
16 matches
Mail list logo
