[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-21 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-20 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov 2010-10-20 14:06:11 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Oct 20 14:06:08 2010 New Revision: 165724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165724 Log: 2010-10-20 Vladimir Makarov PR fortr

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-20 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #24 from Vladimir Makarov 2010-10-20 14:05:25 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Oct 20 14:05:21 2010 New Revision: 165723 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165723 Log: 2010-10-20 Vladimir Makarov PR fortr

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-20 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #23 from Vladimir Makarov 2010-10-20 13:51:37 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Oct 20 13:51:31 2010 New Revision: 165722 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165722 Log: 2010-10-20 Vladimir Makarov PR fortr

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-19 Thread vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther 2010-10-19 10:55:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > Not really, there are about 300 lines of new code (mostly in a new routine). > It might be that only the change in can_reassociate_p is needed to fix th

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 17:54:42 UTC --- Not really, there are about 300 lines of new code (mostly in a new routine). It might be that only the change in can_reassociate_p is needed to fix this bug. That would be a pretty eas

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-18 17:27:04 UTC --- > It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190. > > 2010-08-12 Richard Guenther > > PR tree-optimization/45232 > * tree-ssa-reassoc.

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #18 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 16:55:32 UTC --- It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190. 2010-08-12 Richard Guenther PR tree-optimization/45232 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (can_reassociate_p): Disab

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 15:51:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > Based on my posted test results for hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11, this PR was > fixed on the trunk between r163182 and r163254. > > Need to find the change. My ni

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #16 from John David Anglin 2010-10-17 21:01:27 UTC --- Based on my posted test results for hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11, this PR was fixed on the trunk between r163182 and r163254. Need to find the change.

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.5 |4.4.6

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 09:20 --- Any idea what could be done from the gfortran side? Without being able to reproduce it, it is a bit difficult to debug :-( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-06-28 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 19:31 --- I still see it as of 161474 (both head and 4.5). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-06-11 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #13 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-06-11 20:19 --- On hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, I don't see the testsuite failure after 158397. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-06-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-11 20:07 --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Now (with r160560) appearing for cris-elf too! > > Forgot to mention that it last worked for cris-elf with r160547. Last known appearance r160602, gone again at

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-06-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 21:02 --- (In reply to comment #10) > Now (with r160560) appearing for cris-elf too! Forgot to mention that it last worked for cris-elf with r160547. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-06-10 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 21:00 --- Now (with r160560) appearing for cris-elf too! -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.4 |4.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-16 20:15 --- When compiled with -O2 -Wuninitialized, the reduced test of comment #3 gives ... pr42169.f90: In function 'moment': pr42169.f90:15:0: warning: 'lx' may be used uninitialized in this function pr42169.f90:16:0: warning

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-16 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #8 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-04-16 19:54 --- I think the problem is related to the fact that IRA is trying to figure out if the store of lx1 can be eliminated and lx1 may be uninitialized. The only place lx1 is set is in an if statement in a loop. If we don't exec

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-15 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-04-15 23:47 --- Since the failure requires -O1 as well as -fbounds-check I tried turning off various -O1 optimizations. I could turn off everything (and still get the bug) except if I use -fno-tree-dominator-opts or -fno-guess-branch-pr

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-15 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-04-15 17:10 --- I tried comparing the tree's between hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, where I get the bug and ia64-hp-hpux11.23, where I do not see the bug and I didn't see any real differences in the trees, just differences in the names of genera

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 04:13 --- (In reply to comment #4) > An ice is an ice. However, this is particularly nasty to me since it is > trying > to use reals for index variables. > > Have you tried to get this down to a single loop and get the ice? >

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-14 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-15 00:17 --- An ice is an ice. However, this is particularly nasty to me since it is trying to use reals for index variables. Have you tried to get this down to a single loop and get the ice? In -fdump-tree-original I see t

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-04-14 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
-- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|middle-end |fortran Ever Conf