[Bug fortran/45463] gfortran internal write bug

2010-08-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 02:10 --- > Update: More responses in comp.lang.fortran bring up the point that if > trim(line) > is supposed to return a temporary, the code might be conforming. Seems that > the > situation is not clear... Where in the

[Bug fortran/45463] gfortran internal write bug

2010-08-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 16:49 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Sorry. When I looked after I had posted the question there was only one > > > response and that response said it was a bug so I sub

[Bug fortran/45463] gfortran internal write bug

2010-08-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 16:40 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Sorry. When I looked after I had posted the question there was only one > > response and that response said it was a bug so I submitted this bug report. > > Now o

[Bug fortran/45463] gfortran internal write bug

2010-08-31 Thread david dot sagan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from david dot sagan at gmail dot com 2010-08-31 14:32 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Sorry. When I looked after I had posted the question there was only one > response and that response said it was a bug so I submitted this bug report. > Now other people have posted sayi

[Bug fortran/45463] gfortran internal write bug

2010-08-31 Thread david dot sagan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from david dot sagan at gmail dot com 2010-08-31 14:20 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Did you see the responses to your post in c.l.f? > It seems that your program is non-conforming. I > leave the PR open until either I or someone else > has time to verify the conformity

[Bug fortran/45463] gfortran internal write bug

2010-08-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-31 13:28 --- Did you see the responses to your post in c.l.f? It seems that your program is non-conforming. I leave the PR open until either I or someone else has time to verify the conformity of the program. -- http://gcc.gn